Skip to main content

The pitfalls of using social media and AI for health decisions, according to a doctor

(CNN) — Not sure what type of bug bit you or what caused that rash? Many Americans hashtag their questions and turn to social media for health information, whether they are looking up symptoms, researching a diagnosis or learning about a treatment.

More than 1 in 5 adults in the United States who use social media reported making health decisions based on information they encountered there, according to a study published June 30 in the journal JAMA.

How should people use social media to learn about their health? What are the biggest pitfalls? And how should people think about artificial intelligence, which is increasingly shaping the information they see online?

To help answer these questions, I spoke with CNN wellness expert Dr. Leana Wen, an emergency physician and clinical associate professor at George Washington University. She previously served as Baltimore’s health commissioner.

CNN: What did we learn about Americans using social media for health information in this new study?

Dr. Leana Wen: The study found that social media has become a major source of health information. Nearly 88% of adults reported using social media in the previous year. Among those users, almost 85% said they had shared general or personal health information, and about 70% participated in online health communities. Perhaps the most notable finding was that more than 1 in 5 social media users — about 47 million Americans —reported making health decisions based on information they saw on social media.

At the same time, nearly 78% of users said they believed health information on social media was false or misleading. The researchers also found that older adults and Hispanic users were more likely to report making health decisions based on social media.

Adults with chronic medical conditions including cancer, cardiovascular diseases and mental health conditions were just as likely as those without chronic conditions to make health decisions based on information they encountered online, which suggests that social media has become an important source of health information not only for healthy individuals but also for those managing ongoing medical conditions.

The study analyzed data from the 2024 Health Information National Trends Survey, which is a nationally representative survey funded by the US National Cancer Institute. Researchers examined responses from more than 7,270 adults, representing approximately 262 million adults in the US, to better understand how people engage with health information on social media.

CNN: Why are so many people turning to social media for health information?

Wen: There are many understandable reasons. Social media is fast, free and available at any hour. Certain platforms offer short, easy-to-understand videos or graphics that can explain complicated medical topics. People can also hear directly from others who have experienced the same diagnosis, treatment or procedure, which can be reassuring in ways that a textbook or medical website cannot.

Another reason is that healthcare has become increasingly complex.
Office visits are often extremely time-limited, and people leave with additional questions that they couldn’t get answered there. Or they have new questions but can’t reach their provider in time. Patients may prefer to turn to social media to learn more about a condition, hear how others managed side effects or find practical tips for living with a chronic illness.

CNN: What are the greatest risks of relying on social media for health advice?

Wen: One of the biggest concerns is that social media does not distinguish between expert advice and personal opinion. An experienced physician, a scientist, a patient sharing their story and an influencer with no medical training peddling their own “treatments” may all appear side by side in someone’s feed, with no way to tell which is the most reliable source of information.

Another problem is that social media platforms are designed to maximize engagement. Posts that are surprising, emotional or controversial can often spread much farther, with more “likes” and responses, than nuanced scientific explanations.

In addition, financial conflicts of interest may exist that aren’t being disclosed. Some creators, including some medical providers, are being paid to promote supplements, tests or wellness products.

Finally, the algorithms contained in social media can perpetuate misinformation. Once someone begins watching or interacting with one type of health content, the platform is likely to recommend more of the same. Over time, that can create an echo chamber in which inaccurate claims seem increasingly credible because they are encountered repeatedly. This could lead the patient to distrust genuine — and accurate — medical advice.

CNN: Social media platforms are increasingly using artificial intelligence, and many people are also asking AI chatbots health questions directly. How should people think about using AI for health information?

Wen: AI is changing the health information landscape by generating and amplifying content that people see on social media. Also, many people are now asking AI chatbots health questions directly instead of using a traditional search engine.

I think AI can be a useful educational tool. It can explain medical terminology, summarize reputable medical information, compare treatment options at a high level and help people prepare questions for their next medical visit. Used this way, AI can help patients become better informed and more engaged in their care.

At the same time, AI has important limitations. It can generate information that sounds authoritative but is inaccurate. The tool can misunderstand the details of an individual’s medical situation. At this point, AI models are not advanced enough to be relied upon for medical information and should not replace clinical judgment by a human clinician. People should be just as wary of information obtained from AI as they are of content from social media — and always verify with their clinician.

CNN: Can social media ever be a good source of health information?

Wen: Absolutely; there are many physicians, nurses, scientists, public health agencies, hospitals and patient advocacy organizations that provide accurate, evidence-based information on various social media platforms. Many experts find it to be an excellent way to communicate new research findings and public health recommendations quickly.

Social media can also be valuable for people living with chronic conditions, in particular rare diseases. Patients can learn practical tips for managing daily life, engage in support groups and online communities, and find comfort in knowing that they are not alone.

CNN: What are some best practices for evaluating health information you find on social media?

Wen: The first question is to ask is who is providing this information. Is the source a physician, scientist, academic medical center, government public health agency or established patient advocacy organization? Even if it’s a reputable individual giving health advice, it’s worth asking whether the information is supported by scientific evidence and not just someone’s personal opinion.

Second, be cautious of content that promises quick fixes. If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is. Be especially skeptical if someone is trying to sell a supplement, device or treatment. Medicine is rarely absolute, so I would also be cautious of people who speak in certainties or claim that everyone else is wrong.

Third, verify important information before acting on it. Do your own research and find out whether multiple trusted organizations, such as the World Health Organization, American Medical Association, American College of Physicians, American Academy of Pediatrics and the Cleveland Clinic, are making similar recommendations. If the information would lead you to start a new medication, stop a prescribed treatment or spend money on a product the source is selling, make sure to discuss it with your healthcare provider first.

CNN: What is your bottom-line advice for people who use social media to learn about their health?

Wen: Social media and AI have become permanent parts of how people obtain health information, and there could be real value in making medical knowledge more accessible than ever before.

Like any tool, though, people should understand the best uses and limitations, and to use them wisely. Use the tools to help you understand medical concepts and learn from the experiences of others. But when it comes to decisions about diagnosis or treatment, rely on evidence-based recommendations and discussions with qualified healthcare professionals who can tailor the treatment to your individual medical circumstances.

The-CNN-Wire
™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.

South Carolina to hold first 2028 Democratic presidential primary

▶ Watch Video: Democrats expected to approve South Carolina as first primary in 2028, but other states pushing back Democrats on Saturday approved a new presidential nominating calendar for 2028, cementing South Carolina's place as the first official Democratic primary state, as the party looks to elevate states that better reflect its diverse coalition of voters.The vote came during the Democratic National Committee's summer meeting in Austin, where members signed off on a schedule that begins with South Carolina on Jan. 22, followed by Nevada on Feb. 1. New Hampshire, New Mexico, Michigan and Virginia round out the early-state lineup throughout February, all voting before Super Tuesday.The new calendar goes into effect amid a tug-of-war within the progressive and establishment wings of the party. It also continues a shift away from a tradition that for half a century gave states that are predominantly composed of White voters — Iowa and New Hampshire — outsized influence at the start of the nominating process. Strategists say the new calendar gives greater influence to Black and Latino voters, who make up key parts of the Democratic coalition. "If you're not strong with Latino voters or if you're not strong with Black voters, you know you can only get so far in this calendar," CBS News contributor and Democratic strategist Chuck Rocha said, adding that the schedule shows Black voters "the respect that they're due."Not everyone in the party is on board. Democratic leaders in Iowa and New Hampshire — previously the first and second states to hold primary contests, respectively — excoriated the new map as soon as the DNC's Rules and Bylaws Committee recommended it, arguing that it diminishes the role of states that have long taken on the responsibility of shaping the presidential nomination battlefield. "New Hampshire's First in the Nation primary is a tested proving ground in a closely contested swing state that forges better candidates and better presidents — and despite what DNC insiders say, that hasn't changed," New Hampshire's U.S. congressional delegation said in a statement. "As a state with highly engaged voters, we put candidates through their paces and thoroughly vet them. And our small size means that actually meeting and talking to voters takes precedence over super PACs or mega-donor-fueled campaigns."Momentum for South Carolina's ascension in the calendar traces back to 2020, when a victory there shifted momentum in the presidential primary that year to Joe Biden after he performed poorly in Iowa, New Hampshire and, to a lesser extent, Nevada. Under pressure from Biden and his allies, the DNC moved South Carolina's primary to first for the 2024 calendar. That cycle, New Hampshire defied the DNC's revised schedule and held its primary before South Carolina, citing a state law that mandates it hold the first primary. In response, the party stripped the contest of its sanctioned status. DNC Chair Ken Martin has signaled that if New Hampshire jumps ahead again in 2028, punishment will be more severe. "This is a calendar this party is actually going to protect," Martin told reporters after the DNC's Rules and Bylaws Committee met last month to propose a new schedule. The new calendar could impact the ideological battle within the Democratic Party between establishment moderates and more progressive candidates, including far-left democratic socialists. With no obvious 2028 front-runner, the newly approved schedule gives South Carolina, Nevada and the other four early states disproportionate influence over which faction can build early momentum in the 2028 presidential primaries. Among the states granted early slots, only Nevada and New Mexico offer clear advantages to progressives. Michigan has shown openness this cycle to progressives, with the primary victory of Abdul El-Sayed in the Senate race, but historically has elected more moderate candidates. New Hampshire voters have over time shown an openness to outsiders, but they typically have a more independent streak rather than a steep ideological lean. Progressives face an uphill battle in South Carolina, which has fewer of the White voters with college degrees who tend to support further-left candidates, and Virginia, which has long favored more moderate candidates. The decision to elevate states with large Black and Hispanic populations also comes as Democrats fight to stop the GOP from gaining ground with those two groups in general elections. President Trump won 48% of the Hispanic vote in 2024, up 12 points from four years earlier, and he won 15% of Black voters, almost double his share in 2020, according to the Pew Research Center. His share of non-Hispanic White voters remained stable, at 55%.
Read Next Story