Skip to main content

Suspect among 3 killed in Seattle shooting; teen arrested, 3rd suspect sought

▶ Watch Video: Manhunt underway for suspect in Seattle food festival shooting as new details about incident emerge

Police believe three suspects were involved in a shooting at a food festival near Seattle’s Space Needle on Sunday evening that killed two others and wounded four, according to court documents.

One suspect was killed during the incident, and a 15-year-old was arrested in connection with the shooting, police said in a document filed in juvenile court in Seattle. A third suspect is still on the loose and has not been identified, police said.

“Based on the evidence at the scene, investigators believe” the 15-year-old “and one of the deceased engaged in a gunfight with at least one other unknown suspect,” the document obtained by The Associated Press said.

Earlier, officials clarified that no one had been detained on homicide charges. The teen in custody was booked as part of a firearm and assault investigation, Seattle Mayor Katie Wilson said at a news conference on Monday. The teen waived his initial court appearance Monday, his lawyer told CBS News.

Seattle Assistant Police Chief Tyrone Davis earlier Monday said officers working in the area rushed in and confronted one shooter, which kept more people from being wounded. Two guns were recovered, he added.

Seattle Police Department Assistant Chief of Investigations Nicole Powell said the shooting “could be gang related.”

Seven people were shot in all, officials said. CPR on two wasn’t successful and they were pronounced dead at the scene. They were identified Monday by the King County medical examiner as Junior Cee Niko Semo, 19, and Carlos Israel Sanchez Villalba, 44. A third victim, 56-year-old Ashley Whitehead, later died at Harborview Medical Center. 

Semo’s cause of death was listed as multiple gunshot wounds. Villalba died of a gunshot wound to the torso and Whitehead suffered a gunshot wound to the pelvis, the medical examiner said.

A 2-year-old boy, 39-year-old woman and 23-year-old man were also taken to Harborview and were in stable condition, Davis said, adding that a 40-year-old woman with minor injuries didn’t want to go to the hospital but showed up later at the University of Washington Medical Center.

The shooting occurred around 6 p.m. local time.

Seattle Shooting
Police cover a person after a shooting at Seattle Center during the Bite of Seattle food festival on Sunday, July 26, 2026, in Seattle, Washington.

Estan Wakonabo

The federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives said Sunday night that several of its agents were at the scene and that Seattle police would lead the investigation. Washington Gov. Bob Ferguson said the state SWAT team also responded at the request of Seattle police.

The Seattle Center is a popular tourist location that includes the iconic Space Needle and Climate Pledge Arena, home of the Seattle Kraken and Seattle Storm. The area was filled with people attending the annual Bite of Seattle food festival when the gunfire rang out.

Several witnesses told CBS Seattle affiliate KIRO-TV they heard multiple shots before running away. 

“At first, thought there were fireworks, and then everybody flooded and ran past us,” Nick Bate told the station.

Leanne Coles told KIRO, “Everybody started running, and so we just ran too, and we ran through the garden and we ducked and we decided to keep running with the crowd until we got — I looked up for the Space Needle to try to keep track of where we were. It was really scary.”

The shooting in Seattle brought the total number of mass shootings in the U.S. this year to 271, according to the Gun Violence Archive which tracks gun violence in all 50 states. The tally includes incidents where four or more people were shot, not including the gunman. 

The numbers so far put 2026 on track to exceed the total of 407 mass shootings nationwide in 2025. That’s down from a peak of 611 mass shootings across the U.S. in 2021.

Supreme Court backs Trump’s order to curb mail ballots

(CNN) — The Supreme Court on Monday said that President Donald Trump could begin carrying out parts of an executive order intended to restrict mail voting, but additional legal challenges could hinder implementation of his plan before the November midterm election.The ruling injects new uncertainty about the voting rules for the midterms by keeping alive the possibility that Trump will impose policies outlined in the March order that gave the US Postal Service and the Department of Homeland Security unprecedented roles in the running of elections.The high court’s ruling, handed down in an unsigned order over the dissent of the court’s three liberals, means that the Trump administration may move forward with a proposal for DHS to compile state-specific lists of people it believes are eligible to vote in the Democratic-led states that had challenged the plan in court.Another part of Trump’s executive order instructs the Postal Service to impose new mandates on states that want to send ballots through the mail, requiring that they submit their own lists of eligible voters to the agency and include information on ballot envelopes to allow those ballots to be tracked. The justices gave USPS the green light to implement that aspect of Trump’s plan, but a lower court blocked that effort nationwide in a separate case. That means more court action will likely be needed before the USPS can move forward.The Supreme Court’s decision did not address the legality of Trump’s order, only the timing of the challenge to it. Trump for years has made baseless claims about widespread voter fraud while specifically attempting to undermine confidence in mail voting.“The court’s disposition of this application does not mean that any measure taken by the government to implement the order will necessarily be lawful,” the court wrote. “On that score, time will tell. But the order itself does not harm the states, so the District Court lacked jurisdiction to bar the govern­ment from trying to implement it. And for the reasons dis­cussed, that injunction is likely to irreparably harm the government if it remains in place while the appellate pro­cess runs its course.”And it represents a loss for the Democratic states, who warned they will need to immediately begin diverting time and resources away from preparing for this year’s elections, which are fewer than three months away.Election cases have become particularly contentious this year at the Supreme Court, drawing sharp writing from members of both the conservative and liberal wings. In the highest profile case, the court’s 6-3 conservative majority gutted the Voting Rights Act in a significant ruling in late April dealing with Louisiana’s congressional districts.“The ruling is a win for Trump for the moment, but it doesn’t fully clear the way for his effort to limit mail-in ballots to go into effect. There’s already a separate injunction against the executive order that’s not directly affected by today’s ruling, and as soon as tomorrow, a Massachusetts district court may block the underlying USPS rule at issue—which is the real thing to watch heading into November.”This story is breaking and will be updated.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story