Skip to main content

Strait of Hormuz-style crisis looms for Russia as Ukraine forces shutdown of a key waterway

(CNN) — Russia’s grip on its gateway to the Black Sea is slipping after a series of Ukrainian attacks forced Moscow to suspend traffic through the key waterway this week, limiting the Kremlin’s ability to trade with the rest of the world.

The development marks a major reversal of fortunes for Russia as the Azov Sea was for years out of Kyiv’s reach, providing Russia with a convenient staging ground for attacks against Ukraine and linking vast swaths of southern Russia with the world’s oceans.

But recent advances in Ukraine’s drone program have changed this. Robert Brovdi, the commander of Ukraine’s ‌drone forces, said on Wednesday that Kyiv had hit 116 Russian vessels in the Sea of Azov in just the past nine days – a sharp increase.

Previously, strikes against Russian ships were mostly limited to the shadow fleet and military vessels. CNN cannot independently verify Brovdi’s claim, but videos of some of the recent strikes shared by Ukrainian officials show direct hits.

The relentless attacks have forced Russia to suspend traffic through the Azov Sea by shutting down the two chokepoints in its corners: the Don-Azov Channel, which connects the sea to inland waterways, and the Kerch Strait, which links it to the Black Sea.

Satellite images and vessel-tracking services show long queues of ships waiting on both sides of the sea.

Ukraine has been increasingly successful in targeting Russia’s shadow fleet of oil tankers carrying sanctioned fuel, but blockading the Sea of Azov could have a wider impact, including on exports that have not been subject to sanctions, like wheat or sunflower oil.

The Institute for the Study of War, a US-based conflict monitor, said on Tuesday that the Ukrainian strikes in the Sea of Azov “represent a new phase in Ukraine’s efforts to isolate occupied Crimea from the Russian logistics network and to disrupt Russian seaborne shipping routes, especially for petroleum products and grain.”

Major Evhen Karas, the commander of the 413th Separate Regiment of Unmanned Systems of Ukrainian Armed Forces, a unit that is participating in the operation, said that Russia has turned Crimea into one big military base with units supplying forces that are trying to push further into Ukraine.

“We are cutting all the logistics,” Karas told CNN, saying that Ukraine’s ability to strike further at lower costs “has become a problem the Russians can’t solve.”

“We’ll increase this pressure for as deep as we can reach … this is just the beginning,” he said.

Russia is the world’s largest grain exporter, accounting for about one fifth of global wheat exports, according to the US Department of Agriculture’s Foreign Agricultural Service.

About a quarter of Russia’s wheat exports is shipped through the Sea of Azov, according to Andrey Sizov, a leading Black Sea agricultural markets analyst.

“The Black Sea for (the) wheat market is similar to what the Persian Gulf means for the crude market. (The) Black Sea is by far the biggest supplier of wheat to the global market,” he said, adding that if the situation continues, Russia’s economic losses could climb into billions of dollars.

Prices of wheat futures, a key indicator of traders’ expectations, have jumped in recent days, partly because of the Azov Sea crisis. Russia claims it can bypass the Sea of Azov and reroute all of its grain exports via other terminals in the Black Sea, but Sizov said this would not be possible during the peak season when Russia’s total grain exports far exceed the capacity of those ports.

Russia, which has regularly targeted Ukrainian civilian infrastructure, has accused Kyiv of terrorism and launched strikes against the southern Ukrainian port of Odesa and other targets in the region.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said on Wednesday that Kyiv’s campaign in the Azov Sea was “beyond even piracy.”

“Pirates at least rob and keep the loot for themselves. But here, it is a case of ‘neither for themselves nor for others’ – the goal is simply to cause damage and intimidate. It is terrorism,” he said.

Ukraine has maintained that it was intentionally striking only military targets.

The Ukrainian campaign in the Sea of Azov started as an effort to isolate Crimea, the southern Ukrainian peninsula that has been illegally annexed by Russia since 2014. Russian-installed authorities declared a state of emergency in Crimea last month after Ukrainian strikes on the peninsula lead to widespread power outages and fuel shortages.

Kyiv then stepped up strikes against bridges, highways and railroads to deprive Russia of the ability to transport goods and people through a “land bridge” that connects Crimea to Russia via occupied southern Ukraine. At the same time, it has also been targeting Russian vessels attempting to carry fuel to the peninsula.

Peter the Great’s dream

The Sea of Azov is an inland sea that sits between the southern shores of Ukraine and Russia, a kind of an appendix to the bigger Black Sea.

After Ukraine became independent from the Soviet Union, Moscow and Kyiv struck an agreement in 2003 to share the waterway. But the Kremlin repeatedly broke that deal after the war first started in eastern Ukraine in 2014, when it illegally annexed Crimea.

After launching the full-scale invasion in February 2022, Russia managed to occupy all of the Ukrainian land that surrounds the Sea of Azov, preventing Kyiv from accessing it. Russian President Vladimir Putin even claimed the sea was an internal Russian waterway.

While relatively small and shallow, the Sea of Azov plays a vital role in the Russian economy. It is a key link in a broad system of inland rivers and canals that transport oil, grain, vegetable products, steel and other commodities from large swaths of southern Russia into the Black Sea and then further into the world.

The network was built during Soviet times, but the first attempts to connect the key waterway date back to the reign of Peter the Great, at the end of the 17th century.

Russia seized control of the Sea of Azov after launching its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, using the waterway as the staging ground for attacks against key Ukrainian ports of Mariupol, Melitopol and Berdyansk.

The-CNN-Wire
™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.

La IA crea 16 virus desde cero, lo que combatiría la resistencia a antibióticos, pero alerta sobre su posible uso indebido

Científicos utilizaron un programa de inteligencia artificial para crear genomas virales diferentes de los de cualquier virus conocido en la naturaleza y capaces de atacar huéspedes específicos, según un nuevo estudio. El avance resulta prometedor para la medicina, pero también suscita preocupación por su posible uso indebido.El estudio, publicado el jueves en la revista Science, señala que las secuencias genéticas procedentes de millones de fuentes “de todos los dominios de la vida” sirvieron como corpus de entrenamiento para Evo, una herramienta de IA. El proceso es similar al entrenamiento de ChatGPT y otros modelos de lenguaje con grandes cantidades de textos existentes.Los científicos de Stanford University y el Arc Institute utilizaron después la IA para generar miles de combinaciones genómicas dentro de un marco específico: debían ser compatibles con células de la bacteria E. coli. De los miles de genomas generados por la IA, los investigadores sintetizaron y probaron unos 300 en el laboratorio y determinaron que 16 correspondían a virus viables.Los nuevos virus son bacteriófagos, es decir, virus que infectan bacterias, pero no a los seres humanos.De acuerdo con la investigación, el corpus genético ayudó a la IA a “aprender las restricciones evolutivas” de los genomas naturales. Sin embargo, los científicos descubrieron que uno de los nuevos virus contenía un elemento “evolutivamente distante”. Esto indica que la IA produjo cambios cuya viabilidad podría haber tardado millones de años en manifestarse mediante la evolución natural.Las pruebas mostraron que una combinación de los nuevos virus podía vencer la resistencia a los antibióticos en algunas cepas de E. coli, algo que no consiguió una “combinación comparable de fagos obtenidos de fuentes naturales”.Esto “abre una vía para generar terapias adaptables y robustas con fagos contra patógenos que evolucionan rápidamente”, escribieron los autores.Se trata de un hito científico importante, en momentos en que los investigadores buscan combatir la creciente resistencia a los medicamentos en microorganismos como E. coli.“El avance logrado es significativo”, dijo Jordi García Ojalvo, profesor de biología de sistemas de la Universidad Pompeu Fabra de Barcelona, en declaraciones al Science Media Centre.No obstante, el avance también suscita reservas.“Aunque esto resulta prometedor para las aplicaciones en las ciencias de la vida, también plantea interrogantes urgentes sobre seguridad y protección biológicas”, escribieron especialistas del Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security en un artículo complementario publicado en Science.“Ya existe la capacidad de crear genomas virales mediante IA generativa; lo que no existe es la gobernanza necesaria para utilizarla de manera segura”, escribieron.Los investigadores abordaron directamente las consideraciones de seguridad y protección biológicas en su trabajo. Los especialistas de Johns Hopkins señalaron que lo hicieron “de manera más deliberada que la mayoría de los desarrolladores de potentes modelos biológicos de IA”.La nueva investigación se centró en la bacteria E. coli y en un tipo de virus que no puede infectar a los seres humanos. No está claro hasta qué punto el método podría aplicarse a otros virus.Los autores del artículo complementario señalaron un campo particularmente peligroso que, a su juicio, no debe explorarse: los patógenos capaces de infectar células u organismos eucariotas. Estos pueden causar diversas enfermedades en los seres humanos, entre ellas la malaria y ciertas infecciones por levaduras.“Esos genomas podrían codificar nuevos patógenos capaces de infectar a seres humanos, animales o plantas de formas que las medidas existentes quizá no puedan contener”, escribieron.García Ojalvo dijo que el riesgo de bioseguridad que plantea la nueva investigación es menor que el de otras herramientas de IA. Esto se debe principalmente a que cada genoma debe probarse por separado después de su diseño y a que la tasa de éxito es baja: solo 16 virus resultaron viables entre los cientos de miles generados.“Es difícil imaginar que estos modelos generen automáticamente genomas viables de manera inmediata”, dijo.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story