Skip to main content

South Valley raid uncovers venomous cobras, mambas and an inland taipan

Click here for updates on this story

    ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. (KOAT) — Federal agents uncovered half a pound of cocaine, three guns, $22,000 in cash and 60 snakes during a raid at a South Valley home. The raid was part of an ongoing investigation into the alleged distribution of cocaine.

Many of the snakes found inside the home are venomous.

“There are a lot of kids here. And one of those goes out and they’re gone, I just stay away from snakes. I’m really upset,” said one resident who lived nearby.

According to the seizure inventory, the collection included cobras, mambas, pit vipers and pythons. Some of the snakes were named, including pythons “Sunset” and “William,” and cobras “Blizzard” and “Pablo Escobar.” The inventory also listed an inland taipan.

New Mexico Game and Fish says most of the snakes seized are venomous, and a bite from many of them would require immediate medical attention. Among the reptiles recovered was an inland taipan, considered one of the world’s most venomous snakes. Officials say the snakes appear to be in good condition after undergoing professional examinations. They are now being housed at a permitted facility while the agency works to find permanent placements. Because each species has unique care and safety requirements, the snakes will only be transferred to facilities with trained staff equipped to properly handle and care for venomous reptiles.

Connor Sharp, who captures and relocates snakes for a living, said the inland taipan stood out.

“Somebody having drop for drop the most venomous snake on the planet in captivity just outside of Albuquerque was pretty surprising to me, honestly,” Sharp said.

Sharp noted the danger of the inland taipan goes beyond its venom, as securing the proper treatment is difficult.

“Probably no medical facilities in the state of New Mexico are going to have antivenom that would be used to treat a bite from an inland taipan,” Sharp said.

Treatment for snake bites is also expensive.

“Even for a normal rattlesnake bite in the US, it’s going to cost you about $100,000 with insurance, depending on how severe the bite was,” Sharp said.

Despite the fear associated with snakes, Sharp said they do not want to waste their venom on humans because humans are not a food source.

“If you’re out hiking or in your yard and a snake is around and rattles and alerts you to his presence, if you stop and stay on your ground like you should do, first and foremost, 99% of the time, they are going to move the other direction and try to get away from you,” Sharp said.

The New Mexico Department of Game and Fish is working to provide photos of the seized reptiles.

Please note: This story was provided to CNN Wire by an affiliate and does not contain original CNN reporting. This content carries a strict local market embargo. If you share the same market as the contributor of this article, you may not use it on any platform.

Trump declines to rule out declaring a national security emergency to control the 2026 election

(CNN) — President Donald Trump in a new interview declined to rule out declaring a national security emergency as a means to try to assert more control over the 2026 midterm elections.It’s merely the latest warning sign that Trump could try to mess with the election not just by baselessly claiming voter fraud and challenging the results afterward — as he did in 2020, leading to a violent riot at the US Capitol — but by trying to unilaterally take control before votes are cast.In the interview, Wayne Allyn Root of Real America’s Voice pitched such a scenario to Trump. He suggested it as an alternative, given the Senate has failed to pass Trump’s coveted elections bill, known as the “SAVE America Act.”“If they never get the SAVE America Act done, you have the right to declare a national security emergency for elections,” Root said. He added that “if you declare a national security emergency as the president of the United States, they can’t challenge it. It can only be overturned by a two-thirds vote by both houses of Congress. So if you do this in the next month, we will get photo ID, proof of citizenship (for voter registration) and a limit to mail-in ballots.”It’s at this point that Trump cut Root off and coyly suggested such an option was indeed in play.“Let me just say that stranger things have happened, OK?” Trump said. “I’ll leave it at that.”Despite Root’s comments, it’s far from clear such a gambit would even work. And CNN has asked the White House for more detail on what the president meant.Trump often responds to hypotheticals by declining to rule them out — no matter how extreme the proposal might be. So it’s possible to read too much into this.But as CNN’s Jake Tapper has noted, there are plenty of signals that Trump at least aspires to try to exert more control over elections. And these methods often appear transparently geared toward helping Republicans.A major one is the administration’s threat to have the US Postal Service not deliver mail ballots for states that don’t comply with its demand that they hand over their voter lists. This is a request that even many red states have rejected, citing privacy concerns.Democrats are much more likely to use mail ballots, which Trump has baselessly connected to widespread fraud. So curtailing them could greatly help Republicans.(Federal courts have blocked this Trump executive order, and the administration recently appealed to the Supreme Court.)Trump has also gone to great lengths to try to substantiate his still-baseless claims of widespread fraud. That includes the administration seizing 2020 ballots in Fulton County, Georgia, and Trump’s recent primetime address about election security that some read as a statement of intent — a pretext for more direct federal involvement in elections, which are run by states.Ty Cobb, who served as White House counsel in Trump’s first term, said he interpreted the speech last month as a “predicate that he needs to declare an emergency.”And Trump has occasionally said things, like he did in the new interview, suggesting he would like to take control of US elections.Back in February, he urged his party to “take over the voting in at least 15 places,” adding: “The Republicans ought to nationalize the voting.”The Washington Post also reported in March that pro-Trump activists were circulating a potential executive order that claimed Chinese interference in the 2020 election gave Trump emergency authorities over the 2026 election. And Trump’s primetime address focused on China, despite the tenuous evidence.Trump’s intense focus on the “SAVE America Act,” which has never appeared to have a chance to pass but Trump has said is vital, could also be read as part of building the case for more drastic action.But whether Trump could take over elections himself, as Root posits, is far from certain.As CNN’s Marshall Cohen and Michael Williams reported in February, the Constitution makes it difficult for Trump to truly “nationalize” elections. Courts have overwhelmingly upheld the principle that states are in charge of elections.Presidents generally have more authority to act unilaterally when national security is involved — hence the significance of invoking China — but some experts are skeptical that Trump’s effort would pass legal muster.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story