Skip to main content

Sons say they learned father was killed by ICE through video, news reports

▶ Watch Video: “My dad had been taken away from me”: Sons of man killed by ICE speak out

Houston – Ronaldo Salgado said he learned his father, 52-year-old Mexican immigrant Lorenzo Salgado Araujo, had been shot by an Immigration and Customs Enforcement officer last week through a video posted online that depicted him “screaming” for help.

“He was actively bleeding. He was screaming for someone to help him,” Ronaldo Salgado told CBS News during an interview in Houston this week. “I just felt a lot of fear at that point. And I was running around the site trying to look for answers but those answers never came.”

His younger brother, Lorenzo Salgado Jr., said he found out his father had died while on an airplane on the way to Houston to try to see him.

“Maybe an hour into the flight, I opened the same article that reported that the person had been shot,” Lorenzo Jr. recounted. Then, he added, “the article updated to read, ‘shot, killed.'” 

“I was going back and forth between the bathroom to like clear my nose,” Lorenzo Salgado Jr. said. “And I really tried to stop the tears from falling because I didn’t want anyone’s attention. I really just wanted to get home and be with my family.”

Lorenzo Salgado Jr. noted he was not able to say goodbye to his father, who had lived in the U.S. for over three decades.

Ronaldo Salgado, meanwhile, said he feels deeply guilty about what unfolded last week.

“I’m always going to feel some sort of guilt that I could have been there sooner, that I could have done something,” he said, breaking down in tears. “I fear that I will always live with that guilt, because who knows what would’ve happened if I had been there or if I had arrived at the scene much sooner.”

Conflicting accounts 

The Department of Homeland Security said Salgado Araujo weaponized his work van during a traffic stop on July 7 in Houston, prompting an ICE agent to shoot and kill him. That allegation has been disputed by Salgado Araujo’s family and the three men who were in the van, including his brother. They remain detained by ICE in Texas, facing deportation.

While DHS has said Salgado Araujo was in the U.S. illegally, it has also admitted he was not the target of the ICE operation that preceded his killing. Salgado Araujo’s relatives and friends have also said he lacked a criminal record, which has not been disputed by DHS.

Federal officials at DHS and the Justice Department are investigating the fatal shooting, though an FBI probe is reviewing a potential assault on a federal agent. The Harris County District Attorney and the Texas Rangers have also announced separate investigations into the killing. 

Harris County District Attorney Sean Teare told CBS News he’s “more than prepared” to file charges against ICE agents if he finds criminal wrongdoing on their part. He has sharply criticized ICE’s tactics, arguing that “either these agents are completely untrained, or [they are] intentionally putting themselves in situations where they can justify firing into cars.”

On Tuesday, the FBI revealed in court papers that it is investigating whether drugs were in the van. In an application for a search warrant granted by a judge, an FBI agent said he spotted several bags inside the van that contained a “white crystal-like substance” he believes is consistent with methamphetamine. At the time, the agent said that law enforcement had not yet entered the van, but had taken photos of the bags from outside the vehicle.

There is no indication that ICE’s decision to pursue the Ford Transit van ahead of the fatal shooting was related to concerns about drugs. The FBI agent wrote: “The United States is currently gathering all facts related to this incident, including what may have caused the occupants of the vehicle to flee.”

Less than a week after Salgado Araujo was killed, an ICE officer fatally shot another immigrant in Maine, also during a traffic stop. The killing of 25-year-old Colombian immigrant Johan Sebastián Durán Guerrero escalated concerns over ICE’s tactics, prompting the agency on Tuesday to pause most vehicle stops, pending a review.

But that pause was short-lived. On Wednesday, after President Trump publicly criticized the moratorium, ICE agents were told they could continue to make vehicle stops and arrests.

salgado-family-photo.jpg
Lorenzo Salgado Araujo, on the far left, is pictured with members of his family.

Ronaldo Salgado

“Drawn by the promise” of America

Ronaldo Salgado said his father came from “humble beginnings” in Mexico and immigrated to the U.S. to ensure his family, including his children, did not have to deal with the same challenges and backbreaking work he faced.

“He wanted people to achieve the American dream, just like he gave us the opportunity to achieve the American dream, to become college educated, to become family men, men of good character,” Ronaldo Salgado said.

Lorenzo Salgado Jr. said his father was a man who was proud of his family, loved music and valued “honest work.”

“He was drawn by the promise that in America you can, if you put in the work, you’ll get paid what you deserve, and the idea that in America, you can build yourself up from nothing to become someone, and to give your family a better future,” he added.

Both brothers are American citizens. Since their father was killed, they have been helped and represented by the American Civil Liberties Union of Texas and the League of United Latin American Citizens.

Asked what justice would look like for them as it relates to their father’s killing, Lorenzo Salgado Jr. called it a “difficult question.”

“I think we’ll have justice when my mom feels ready to go outside, without fear,” he said. “When people don’t have to live in shadows, and of course, the first step there, like my brother said, is completing an investigation completely transparent and in full.”

Trump’s address is likely to cast new cloud over midterm elections

(CNN) — President Donald Trump has passed up multiple chances to explain to Americans how his latest escalation will win the war in Iran or how he’ll alleviate their perpetually high costs for groceries, housing and fuel.Now he’s planning to anchor a national address Thursday evening on a personal fixation about the past — his false claim that he won the 2020 election.Critics fear this is all part of a quickening effort to buckle trust in voting systems and to create a pretext to use federal powers to sway November’s midterm elections. It would not be the first time that this president — who convention states should seek to bolster American democracy — has instead undermined it.“It doesn’t get bigger, because without free and fair elections, you don’t have a country,” the president said Wednesday as he previewed his speech. “We’ll be discussing other things too, but it’s going to be a very big announcement.”Trump’s rising drumbeat of warnings is broadening unease that he’s not just recycling claims about the 2020 election that were debunked by multiple courts, state Republicans and even his first-term administration. Trump, as he has in the past, seems to be building a fallback narrative if the Republican Party fares poorly in November and to portray any election that he doesn’t win, as, by definition, unfair.No one outside the White House knows what the president will say on Thursday. But there’s no credible sign yet that he has compelling new evidence of voter fraud that would contradict an overwhelming body of evidence that the 2020 election was fair or countless academic studies finding that major irregularities are very rare in US elections.But Trump’s speech may confirm a familiar pattern. In 2016, 2020, and 2024, as voting neared, he stepped up efforts to cast doubt on the fairness of elections. In 2020, this morphed into active election interference after he refused to concede to Joe Biden and sought to overturn the result without evidence. His campaign culminated in a riot by his supporters intended to thwart the certification of the president-elect’s win, during which police officers were beaten and the US Capitol was desecrated.In one of the first acts of his second term, Trump pardoned or commuted sentences for hundreds convicted in connection with January 6, 2021, sending a message that election violence or attempts to subvert democracy on his behalf were acceptable and above the law.Alarm bells are ringing again, partly because of the role of Trump’s interim director of national intelligence, Bill Pulte, whom the president implied was sent to the top spy agency to find evidence about “rigged elections.” The FBI has meanwhile been investigating 2020 elections in Georgia, a state Trump lost, after seizing boxes of election materials. That election was deemed free and fair multiple times by GOP state officials following forensic audits.Nationwide, the administration has been demanding voter rolls, raising fears it intends to infringe the constitutional mandate that states, not the federal government, oversee elections. Trump is also making every domestic priority subordinate to his pressure on Republicans to pass the “SAVE America Act,” which, while containing reforms on requiring voter ID — which many citizens support — also threatens to make voting harder, curtail registration and narrow the franchise for minority voters. It could also give Trump more power to interfere in national elections.In the past, US intelligence agencies have concluded that foreign states and actors have tried to influence US elections. But pro-democracy groups fear that Trump’s team will use such evidence out of context to suggest there was active and successful interference to hurt Trump.Ben Berwick, who leads the Election Law and Litigation Team for Protect Democracy, a nonpartisan group, expects the president to recycle his repeatedly debunked claims about the 2020 election on Wednesday evening. “I think there’s no doubt that a major piece of what is happening is really an intent to sow doubt about the 2026 election,” he said.Administration officials insist their only goal is to secure elections. “The work that we’re doing is to make sure that we have fair and honest elections,” Trump’s nominee for attorney general, Todd Blanche, said in his confirmation hearing Wednesday. Blanche said the goal is to ensure “that the only people voting are the people who are eligible to vote and that they’re only voting once.” Still, one reason some voters may be having doubts about the integrity of US democracy is that Trump and his supporters have spent so much time trashing it.Trump officials know the price for entry to his inner circle — accepting the false orthodoxy that he won in 2020. The latest official to dodge an unequivocal statement that Biden was rightfully elected was Jay Clayton, during his confirmation hearing Wednesday to be director of national intelligence. “I believe he had the most electoral votes,” Clayton said of Biden.When officials adopt such formulations they are ignoring facts and evidence, which raises questions about how they’d act if the president seeks again to overturn the result of a democratic election.The US government’s own election security agencies under the Election Infrastructure Government Coordinating Council concluded during Trump’s first administration that the 2020 election was “the most secure in American history” and that “there is no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised.”Republicans are frustrated Trump won’t speak about what matters to voters Trump’s refusal to move on infuriates many Republicans, even if most are loath to speak out publicly against a president who still commands the grassroots MAGA base. Republican Sen. John Cornyn, however, has a measure of freedom after losing his primary in Texas to a Trump-endorsed rival. “I, frankly, am more concerned about the upcoming midterm elections than I am … what happened in 2020, and obviously election integrity is very important. But I personally don’t see any point in relitigating an election that occurred six years ago,” Cornyn said.But Trump finds it impossible to drive a consistent electoral message. He rarely mounts an effective campaign around a domestic policy bill that handed many Americans higher tax refunds and temporarily reduced taxes on tips and overtime. Nor does he spend much time touting efforts to make prescription drugs more affordable through his TrumpRX website. When the White House schedules a trip to discuss affordability — the key 2026 election issue — Trump often deliberately ditches the script. He’d rather talk about his construction of an architectural legacy in the White House complex and around DC.Concern that he may seek an illegitimate way to boost Republicans in the midterms is also rising because a clutch of gathering political crises threaten to dampen Republicans’ prospects. The stakes are huge: If Democrats win back one chamber of Congress, they will have the power to subject the president’s second term and personal financial arrangements to unprecedented oversight.The unpopular Iran war is raging again, confounding Trump’s claims that he won it within days of its February launch and renewing the risk of soaring gasoline prices that anger voters. Several recent deaths linked to immigration raids by federal agents are reminding the country how much it dislikes one of Trump’s cornerstone policies. And while he mocks the idea that millions of Americans are struggling to afford the basics of daily life, he’s added $2 billion in personal wealth since returning to office.The latest polling reflects Trump’s worsening political position. A Reuters/Ipsos poll completed Sunday found 79% of respondents think US military involvement in the war will “go on for an extended period of time,” up from 65% in late March. A PBS/NPR/Marist poll in June found only 33% of Americans approve of Trump’s handling of the economy. If immigration recaptures the headlines, that might also be bad news for Trump. A Marquette Law School poll in May showed voters had an unfavorable view of the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency by 61%-36%.Why the 2020 election fixation may alienate voters Trump has made no secret of his admiration for strongman leaders. His opponents fear he may take a page from the playbook of authoritarians who erode democratic societies when their popularity wanes.Sen. Jon Ossoff, a Georgia Democrat whose 2020 election has been the source of rumors on conservative media sites in relation to Trump’s speech, hit on this potential political motivation for Trump’s speech this week. “Privately, most elected Republicans in this building think the president has lost it and is dooming them to dismal losses this fall,” Ossoff told reporters Tuesday.Ossoff also had a heated exchange with Clayton over the administration’s new election probe in the hearing on Wednesday. His keenness to engage on this issue implies that he sees it as a losing one for his Trump-backed opponent. “Mike Collins launched his general election campaign doubling down on his 2020 election denials. Now he not only has to defend doubling health insurance premiums for more than a million Georgians, he has to defend these conspiracy theories about the 2020 election that Georgia voters have rejected time and time again,” Ossoff said.On one level, Trump’s address may come to be seen as symptomatic of his tendency to pursue his own narrow interests in a second term that appears rather remote from the concerns of millions of voters.On another, it is likely to fuel fresh questions about how Trump would respond to another GOP electoral loss after spending years arguing his last defeat was illegitimate.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story