Skip to main content

Severely ill prisoners granted early release are left stuck behind bars

ʻAIEA, Hawai’i — Christian Alameda used a cane to push himself up out of bed in his cell at the Halawa Correctional Facility in Honolulu. He has been recovering in the prison’s medical infirmary since a January stroke left the right side of his body mostly paralyzed.

In February, Hawai’i’s parole board granted the now-52-year-old compassionate release, which allows prisoners to receive early probation to seek medical attention for severe conditions.

But without a long-term care facility willing to accept him, Alameda has not been able to leave.

As of June, at least three other prisoners granted release to tend to their medical needs were living indefinitely in the infirmary after long-term care facilities were unwilling to accept them, primarily because of their criminal backgrounds, the state parole authority said.

“This is a challenge across the country,” said Molly Crane, an attorney for FAMM, which advocates for fairness in prison policies.

Every state allows compassionate release for prisoners, though Hawaiʻi is the only one without a specific law, relying instead on an internal policy. The prisoners who typically qualify for compassionate release can’t care for themselves or have terminal illnesses and may need an assisted living center, a nursing home, or hospice.

But many long-term care facilities nationwide decline to take such prisoners, leaving them incarcerated for months — or years — after they were granted release.

In Rhode Island, a study found that rejections from nursing homes soared after they were told that a patient was coming from prison. In Colorado, prisoners with extensive medical needs on average stayed 200 days after being granted parole, because of denials from long-term care centers. And in New York, prisoners granted parole sued the state when they couldn’t get placed in nursing homes.

President Donald Trump’s signature One Big Beautiful Bill Act further strains long-term care providers’ ability to take people from incarceration. Prisoners don’t qualify for Medicaid, so parolees often need to apply after they’re granted the release. The law, enacted last summer, reduces the window in which facilities can get reimbursed retroactively for new Medicaid patients from three months to as little as 30 days before they apply. That means facilities risk not getting paid for new Medicaid patients whose applications are not submitted within the reduced timeframe.

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services “encourages providers and beneficiaries to prioritize timely application submission to maximize coverage,” CMS spokesperson Timothy Foster said.

“Risk is just too high”

Most nursing homes nationwide already have a waiting list for new residents, according to a 2024 report by the American Health Care Association and the National Center for Assisted Living. Those waitlists are another hurdle to getting prisoners placed, said Bob Merce, a former attorney who advocates for prisoners’ compassionate release.

“We tell the nursing homes that most of the people who we are talking about cannot hurt somebody,” Merce said.

Some of the prisoners staying at the Halawa infirmary in June couldn’t walk or dress themselves. One man couldn’t recall what his illness was. Another with brain cancer couldn’t coherently respond to questions.

The Halawa Correctional Facility in Honolulu
The Halawa Correctional Facility in Honolulu is Hawai’i’s only medium-security state prison. Its infirmary has six cells where prisoners granted compassionate release often remain until they are able to get placed at a long-term care facility.

Ashley Mizuo/KFF Health News

Sean Sanada, the Oʻahu Region CEO with the Hawaiʻi Health Systems Corp., oversees the region’s two state-funded long-term care facilities, Leahi Hospital and Maluhia. Sanada said that the health system has reviewed dozens of compassionate release referrals but has never accepted any of them.

Sanada said the facilities don’t discriminate based on where the resident comes from. His main concerns, he said, were his staff’s safety and the lack of resources to adequately care for the patient.

“The risk is just too high in most of those instances,” Sanada said.

Violent incidents in long-term care facilities have been well documented. A 2024 study observing 14 assisted living facilities found that in just one month, 15% of residents experienced resident-to-resident aggression.

When long-term care facilities refuse to accept prisoners who have been granted compassionate release, it leaves state taxpayers footing a larger bill. The annual cost to incarcerate an individual in Hawai’i with complex needs is up to eight times the $112,505 average of housing one person in prison, according to FAMM. In comparison, the average Medicaid reimbursement for long-term care patients at a Hawaiʻi Health Systems Corp. facility is about $135,000 a year.

Four states — Connecticut, Georgia, Massachusetts, and Vermont — contract with nursing facilities to take prisoners who are granted compassionate release, according to FAMM.

The iCare Health Network’s MissionCare Health, which operates nursing homes for people coming out of prison, secured contracts in three of those states. David Skoczulek, iCare’s vice president of business development and communication, estimated that its rates are $100 to $350 a day more per patient than the average nursing home rates in the states where they operate.

In Hawaiʻi, the correctional department determines recommendations to send to the parole board, which decides whether to grant the release. Prisoners who are granted the early probation can be released to family members who commit to caring for them or to a long-term care facility.

Corey Reincke, head of the Hawaiʻi Paroling Authority, said that in his 24-year career he couldn’t recall getting anyone placed into a long-term care facility without family intervening, for instance by contacting facilities themselves.

“Parole has to find a facility that can meet their medical needs and is also willing to take them,” Reincke said. “That’s where we’re hitting the roadblocks.”

For one parolee, Reincke called more than 100 care homes, he said, but they all declined to accept the patient, over safety concerns. According to a 2024 state report, while Hawaiʻi’s long-term care facilities use about 80% of their bed capacity, workforce strains make it difficult to maintain even those levels.

Hawaiʻi prisoners’ refuge: family

Last year, 69-year-old Paul Kupihea died at a hospital five days after the state granted him compassionate release to his family. He died before he could get on a flight to his home island.

In July 2025, Lahela Kruse, the mother of Kupihea’s child, received a call from a Honolulu hospital informing her that his condition had become severe. By then he had been diagnosed with an incurable form of cancer and had been in and out of the hospital while still in custody.

Kruse and their daughter flew to Oʻahu to see him and were shocked when they saw how sick he was. Their daughter agreed to take him into her home in Hilo, on Hawaiʻi Island, despite not having a relationship with him for most of her life.

“She knew he was sick,” Kruse said. “I told her that, but she didn’t know the severity of it. I didn’t truly know.”

Her daughter’s willingness to take him prompted his compassionate release. But Kruse said the notification about Kupihea’s illness came too late.

FAMM’s Crane has been working on expanding compassionate release laws in states to allow for more prisoners to qualify and strengthen transparency in the process. Hawaiʻi lawmakers have tried for years to pass bills on compassionate release, but none has succeeded.

Crane said without a law that outlines a formal process and who qualifies, even family support isn’t enough. Prisoners can still face life-threatening delays, she said.

“The absence of a compassionate release statute means that people who need compassionate release languish and even die in prison,” Crane said.

In Alameda’s cell, two beds stood about 3 feet apart, with a seatless metal toilet in the corner and a window looking out on a concrete wall. The smell of bleach permeated the room. Alameda said he hoped to see his daughter soon. She recently turned 5.

“I made some mistakes in my life,” said Alameda, who has been incarcerated since 2024 for drug possession, driving a stolen vehicle, and jumping bail. “I tried when my daughter was born, but I know I’ll change, because she needs me out of here.”

Merce, the former attorney, is still trying to find a place for Alameda, who committed no violent crimes. Merce became aware of prisoners’ struggles through his work as a trial lawyer. He said he has helped about 15 prisoners leave Hawaiʻi correctional facilities for medical treatment.

He said he’s seen cases in which people have waited years to get out.

“The ones that stick with me, though,” Merce said, “are the ones that I never found placements for.”

KFF Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF — the independent source for health policy research, polling, and journalism.

Trump se niega a descartar una declaración de emergencia de seguridad nacional para controlar las elecciones de 2026

El presidente Donald Trump se negó en una nueva entrevista a descartar la posibilidad de declarar una emergencia de seguridad nacional para tratar de ejercer un mayor control sobre las elecciones intermedias de 2026.Es la advertencia más reciente de que Trump podría intentar interferir en las elecciones no solo al afirmar, sin fundamento, que hubo fraude electoral y cuestionar los resultados después de la votación, como hizo en 2020, lo que provocó un violento disturbio en el Capitolio de Estados Unidos, sino también al tratar de asumir unilateralmente el control antes de que se emitan los votos.En la entrevista, Wayne Allyn Root, de Real America’s Voice, planteó a Trump un escenario de ese tipo. Lo propuso como alternativa, dado que el Senado no ha logrado aprobar el proyecto de ley electoral que Trump considera prioritario, conocido como la “Ley SAVE America”.“Si nunca logran aprobar la ‘Ley SAVE America’, tienes derecho a declarar una emergencia de seguridad nacional para las elecciones”, dijo Root. Añadió que “si declaras una emergencia de seguridad nacional como presidente de Estados Unidos, no pueden impugnarla. Solo puede ser revocada mediante una votación de dos tercios de ambas cámaras del Congreso. Así que, si lo haces el próximo mes, tendremos identificación con foto, prueba de ciudadanía (para el registro electoral) y un límite al voto por correo”.Fue en ese momento cuando Trump interrumpió a Root y sugirió, de manera ambigua, que esa opción efectivamente estaba sobre la mesa.“Permítanme decir simplemente que han sucedido cosas más extrañas, ¿de acuerdo?”, dijo Trump. “Lo dejaré así”.A pesar de los comentarios de Root, no está claro en absoluto que una maniobra de ese tipo pudiera funcionar. Y CNN pidió a la Casa Blanca más detalles sobre lo que quiso decir el presidente.Trump suele responder a situaciones hipotéticas negándose a descartarlas, sin importar cuán extrema pueda ser la propuesta. Por lo tanto, es posible interpretar demasiado sus palabras.Pero, como ha señalado Jake Tapper, de CNN, hay numerosas señales de que Trump al menos aspira a intentar ejercer un mayor control sobre las elecciones. Y estos métodos suelen estar claramente orientados a ayudar a los republicanos.Una de las principales señales es la amenaza del Gobierno de lograr que el Servicio Postal de Estados Unidos no entregue las papeletas de voto por correo de los estados que no cumplan con su exigencia de entregar sus listas de votantes. Incluso muchos estados republicanos han rechazado esta solicitud, alegando preocupaciones por la privacidad.Los demócratas tienen muchas más probabilidades de utilizar el voto por correo, una modalidad que Trump ha vinculado, sin fundamento, con un fraude generalizado. Por lo tanto, limitarlo podría beneficiar considerablemente a los republicanos.(Los tribunales federales han bloqueado este decreto de Trump, y el Gobierno apeló recientemente ante la Corte Suprema).Trump también se ha esforzado mucho para intentar sustentar sus afirmaciones, todavía sin fundamento, sobre un fraude generalizado. Eso incluye que el Gobierno incautara las papeletas de 2020 en el distrito de Fulton, Georgia, y el reciente discurso de Trump en horario estelar sobre la seguridad electoral, que algunos interpretaron como una declaración de intenciones, un pretexto para una participación federal más directa en las elecciones, que son administradas por los estados.Ty Cobb, quien se desempeñó como abogado de la Casa Blanca durante el primer mandato de Trump, dijo que interpretó el discurso del mes pasado como una “base para que declare una emergencia”.Y Trump ha dicho ocasionalmente cosas, como lo hizo en la nueva entrevista, que sugieren que le gustaría asumir el control de las elecciones en Estados Unidos.En febrero, instó a su partido a “tomar el control de la votación en al menos 15 lugares” y añadió: “Los republicanos deberían nacionalizar la votación”.The Washington Post también informó en marzo que activistas pro-Trump estaban haciendo circular un posible decreto que afirmaba que la interferencia china en las elecciones de 2020 le otorgaba a Trump facultades de emergencia sobre las elecciones de 2026. Y el discurso de Trump en horario estelar se centró en China, pese a las pruebas poco sólidas.El intenso interés de Trump en la “Ley SAVE America”, que nunca pareció tener posibilidades de ser aprobada, pero que Trump ha dicho que es fundamental, también podría interpretarse como parte de un intento por construir los argumentos para una medida más drástica.Sin embargo, no está claro en absoluto que Trump pudiera asumir por sí mismo el control de las elecciones, como plantea Root.Como informaron Marshall Cohen y Michael Williams, de CNN, en febrero, la Constitución dificulta que Trump pueda realmente “nacionalizar” las elecciones. Los tribunales han respaldado abrumadoramente el principio de que los estados están a cargo de las elecciones.Por lo general, los presidentes tienen mayor autoridad para actuar unilateralmente cuando está involucrada la seguridad nacional, de ahí la importancia de invocar a China, pero algunos expertos dudan de que el intento de Trump pueda superar el escrutinio legal.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story