Skip to main content

¿Quién es el Dr. Doom, el nuevo gran villano de Marvel en “Avengers: Doomsday”?

No es fácil superar a un villano como Thanos. Fue el principal antagonista del llamado Universo Cinematográfico Marvel (MCU, por sus siglas en inglés) a lo largo de 23 películas, saga que culminó con “Avengers: Endgame” y “Spider-Man: Far from Home”, ambas de 2019.

Ser mejor (o peor) que Thanos es entonces el papel que ahora corresponde al Dr. Doom, quien será el principal villano enfrentado a más de 20 superhéroes en la esperada película de Marvel “Avengers: Doomsday”, que se estrena este diciembre en cines y cuyo tráiler se divulgó el lunes.

Doom es un villano popular en las historietas de Marvel desde hace más de 60 años. Pero a diferencia de Thanos, que fue mencionado en muchas películas antes de aparecer de manera plena en “Avengers: Infinity War” (2018), Marvel Studios decidió que la mejor manera de generar interés por Doom de manera instánea era que lo interpretara una estrella de fama mundial.

Y la solución fue elegir a Robert Downey Jr., cuyo personaje de Iron Man/Tony Stark había fallecido en “Avengers: Endgame” en 2019. El anuncio fue hecho en la Comic Con de San Diego, el 27 de julio de 2024. Un grupo de personas vestidas como Dr. Doom subió al escenario del panel de Marvel y, de entre ellos, surgió uno, vestido de verde, quien se quitó la máscara, revelando el rostro de Downey Jr.

Ayudaba, además, que el Dr. Doom es conocido por ocultar su rostro tras una máscara de metal. Luce como una jugada perfecta para Marvel Studios, aunque hay fans que están algo desconcertados por la elección del actor. ¿Es acaso Doom un Tony Stark malvado de otra dimensión? Nada hay claro por ahora.

El arribo de Dr. Doom fue algo accidentado para el Universo Cinematográfico Marvel, pues el plan inicial era que, tras Thanos, el nuevo villano fuese Kang el conquistador. Este personaje fue el “malo” en las temporadas 1 y 2 de la serie “Loki” (2021-2023) y en la película “Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania”, de 2023. Ninguno de estos proyectos fue un fenómeno de audiencia ni de taquilla. Tampoco ayudó que el intérprete de Kang, el actor Jonathan Majors, se viera envuelto en un caso de violencia doméstica. Marvel desechó a Kang y buscó a otro villano famoso de las historietas. Así llegó Doom.

El personaje de Víctor von Doom, mejor conocido como Dr. Doom, fue creado por Stan Lee y Jack Kirby. Apareció por primera vez en el ejemplar #5 de “The Fantastic Four” en 1962, en el que crea una plataforma que permite viajar en el tiempo. De hecho, puede decirse que Doom es el archienemigo de los 4 Fantásticos en las historietas.

Doom es el monarca del ficticio reino de Latveria, en Europa del Este, hijo de un curandero y una hechicera gitana. Sus poderes son una mezcla entre su amplio conocimiento científico y su dominio de las artes de la hechicería. Busca dominar al mundo e imponer el orden en la humanidad.

Siente un odio profundo hacia su antiguo rival en la universidad, el Dr. Reed Richards (líder de los 4 Fantásticos), a quien considera culpable del accidente de laboratorio que desfiguró su rostro. Esa es la razón por la que oculta su cara tras una máscara de metal.

Además de la máscara, Doom viste una armadura metálica forjada con magia, lo que le otorga fuerza sobrehumana, la capacidad de volar y armamento de tecnología. Esto queda en evidencia en el primer tráiler de “Avengers: Doomsday”, en el que se ve cómo detiene el hacha Stormbreaker de Thor (Chris Hemsworth) con solo dos dedos.

Entre los poderes de Doom está su intelecto (es un genio al nivel de Tony Stark y Reed Richards), la proyección de energía y el combate cuerpo a cuerpo. Además, como jefe de Estado de Latveria, posee inmunidad diplomática, lo que lo protege de ser enjuiciado por tribunales fuera de Latveria.

Además de enfrentarse recurrentemente a los 4 Fantásticos, el Dr. Doom también ha combatido contra Spider-Man, Iron Man, Doctor Strange, Black Panther, los X-Men y los Vengadores.

En los cómics, Doom creó un ejército de robots a su imagen a los que llamó Doombots. Debido a su avanzada inteligencia artificial, con los años muchos Doombots han llegado a creer que son el Doctor Doom real. Al mismo tiempo, sus habilidades como hechicero son prodigiosas y comparables con las del mismísimo Doctor Strange.

Esa es la pregunta del millón de dólares. En principio, Tony Stark murió en “Avengers: Endgame”, así que nada impide que Downey Jr. interprete a otro personaje… y más si oculta su rostro tras una máscara.

Pero hay algunos indicios que hacen sospechar que el actor pudiera estar interpretando en “Avengers: Doomsday” una versión de Tony Stark de una realidad alternativa. La primera sospecha es que en el primer tráiler aparece Loki (Tom Hiddleston) y muestra su carnet de identificación como trabajador de la Time Variance Authority (TVA), organismo de Marvel que controla los multiversos.

Y, además, está el precedente de las historietas: Doom es una figura central en una de las sagas más importantes de Marvel, “Secret Wars” (2015), en la que asume los poderes de Beyonder, comparables a los de una divinidad —pinta su armadura de blanco y se hace llamar Dios Emperador Doom— y forma su propio multiverso con elementos de distintas realidades. Pero Reed Richards lo derrota y redime, tiempo en el que Doom adopta brevemente la personalidad de Iron Man. Pero esta identidad no dura mucho, pues Doom vuelve a su rol de villano.

Estas referencias ofrecen indicios de que en la nueva fase de Marvel que se inicia con “Avengers: Doomsday” —y en la que se adaptará la saga “Secret Wars”— el Doctor Doom pueda ser una variante de Tony Stark de otro multiverso. Pero, hasta ahora, Marvel Studios insiste en que Downey Jr. interpreta a Víctor von Doom. La respuesta yace en la pantalla.

“Avengers: Doomsday” se estrena en cines este 18 de diciembre.

The-CNN-Wire
™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.

Another Democratic nail-biter in Wisconsin and other takeaways from Tuesday’s primaries

(CNN) — The Democratic primary for governor in Wisconsin was neck-and-neck early Wednesday morning, with democratic socialist state lawmaker Francesca Hong and moderate Milwaukee County Executive David Crowley separated by less than a percentage point.The race was seen as a gauge of the party’s ideological direction — testing whether the progressive insurgency that has played out in deep-blue districts this spring and summer would extend into another presidential battleground.Hong, though, faced deep concerns about her electability, and outgoing Gov. Tony Evers sought to rally Democrats behind Crowley in the race’s final days.It was the most closely watched race on a primary day that included a Democratic Senate battle in Minnesota, a Republican Senate contest in South Carolina and a long-time incumbent being ousted in Connecticut. Here are takeaways from Tuesday’s primaries:Another underperformance for the leftAugust has been a big test for the left-wing of the Democratic Party – a rare chance for it to demonstrate its ability to win not just in deep-blue urban areas but also swing states.But for the second straight week, its candidate had a dogfight on their hands. Last week, it was Abdul El-Sayed winning the Michigan Democratic Senate primary by a very narrow margin; this week, it’s Hong facing a race that is closer than many expected.So, what might explain this?One possibility is that some voters might be gun-shy about following through and voting for candidates who might struggle to win in the general election. Democratic leaders have worried greatly about nominating both El-Sayed and Hong, and perhaps some voters were convinced those votes would be too risky.Polling primary elections is also more difficult than general elections, because the universe of voters isn’t as predictable. And there is some thought that these surveys might be over-sampling more-educated, urban voters (who favor more left-wing candidates) and under-sampling more rural, blue-collar ones.Plus, there just wasn’t much quality polling in either race.But in the case of the Hong-Crowley race, there could be another explanation: that the opposition to Hong simply consolidated late.A late July poll from Marquette Law School showed Hong at 46%, former Lt. Gov. Mandela Barnes at 21%, and Crowley at 11%.Sometimes when it’s clear a race is coming down to two candidates, voters see that and decide to choose between them. Crowley became the alternative when Barnes dropped out the day after that poll was released.Progressive wins Minnesota Senate primaryNext door in Minnesota, progressives won yet another race that served as a proxy battle between the party’s left and center flanks.Lt. Gov. Peggy Flanagan defeated moderate Rep. Angie Craig in the Democratic Senate primary. The two were competing for the party’s nomination to replace retiring Sen. Tina Smith.Flanagan criticized Craig’s history of financial support from the American Israel Public Affairs Committee. She also lambasted Craig’s vote for the Laken Riley Act, which mandates the detention of undocumented immigrants charged with certain crimes and which the congresswoman now says she regrets supporting. The issue of immigration enforcement became a flashpoint in Minnesota after federal agents shot and killed two US citizens who were protesting mass deportation efforts there in January.Flanagan, however, never ignited the sorts of deep worries about electability that Hong faced in Wisconsin. She was also endorsed by Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders and Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren, both of whom sat out the Wisconsin governor’s race.The lieutenant governor will be the heavy favorite in November, when she’ll take on former NFL broadcaster Michele Tafoya, a first-time candidate.Progressives notched another victory in Minnesota in the primary for the 2nd District House seat that Craig is vacating. Matt Little, a former state senator, emerged as the winner in a crowded field in the Twin Cities’ southern suburbs.Darline Graham makes runoff, but has her work cut out for herDarline Graham rode President Donald Trump’s support to a Senate appointment and, now, to first place in South Carolina’s Republican special primary for a full term. But whether it will take her any further in the August 25 runoff is a big open question.Graham took about one-third of the vote on Tuesday, running well ahead of her new runoff opponent, Rep. Ralph Norman. But that’s no guarantee that she’ll be the favorite in the runoff, where the winner needs to get a majority of the vote.In fact, Graham is pretty far from 50%-plus-one, relative to other Trump-endorsed candidates. Before Tuesday, only one Trump-backed statewide candidate took less of the primary vote than she did.That was South Carolina Lt. Gov. Pam Evette in the June gubernatorial primary; she went on to lose by 37 points in the runoff, when her opponents’ supporters coalesced.One of the other candidates in that gubernatorial primary was Norman, who finished in third place with 17% in the initial contest. That wasn’t a great showing, but it meant he had a statewide campaign infrastructure to tap into in the wake of Sen. Lindsey Graham’s death last month.Norman has strong conservative bona fides as a leader of the House Freedom Caucus, which could be especially valuable in a one-on-one matchup with Darline Graham. And he served notice Tuesday that he’ll contrast his proven conservative record with her lack of a political track record.“My record is an open book,” he said.If Norman has one problem, it might be his decision in 2024 to back former South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley over Trump. Norman has explained it was because of personal ties, but Trump often holds grudges over such things.It’s been a bad week for Trump’s endorseesNot only does Graham have plenty of work to do, but MyPillow founder Mike Lindell’s loss in the Minnesota GOP gubernatorial primary means three Trump-backed candidates have lost since last Tuesday.The first was Michigan congressional candidate Amir Hassan on August 4. He lost to a candidate who had dropped out of the race, Tom Smith, by double-digits.Then it was incumbent Rep. Andy Ogles falling to former Tennessee Agriculture Commissioner Charlie Hatcher on Thursday.And now it’s Graham going to a runoff and Lindell losing to Minnesota state House Speaker Lisa Demuth.Lindell’s loss means seven Trump-backed candidates for Congress or statewide office have lost this primary season, including five who ran for statewide office.The seven losses are more than Trump-backed candidates had in 2018, 2020 and 2024, according to a CNN review of data from Ballotpedia. And the four gubernatorial candidates who have now lost this year is more than in 2022, as well.Democratic upheaval in ConnecticutIn central Connecticut, the Democratic divide was less about ideology than generational change as voters in the 1st District ousted 78-year-old incumbent Rep. John Larson in favor of 47-year-old former Hartford Mayor Luke Bronin.Bronin’s win is a reminder of just how restive Democratic voters are. The party’s youth movement is being accelerated in the aftermath of former President Joe Biden’s ill-fated decision to seek reelection, only to drop out of the race as concerns about the then 81-year-old president’s age and mental acuity mounted.Larson, a 14-term incumbent, faced health concerns after abruptly freezing on the House floor during a February 2025 speech. He later said he suffered a complex partial seizure and had been prescribed medication that would “greatly reduce” the chances of another such episode.The longtime congressman made the case that his seniority best positioned him to deliver on the district’s priorities. But Bronin said Democrats need a new direction and a greater sense of urgency in taking on the Trump administration. He won the Connecticut Democratic Party’s endorsement, and was also backed by former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg, a likely 2028 presidential contender.Dems stick with establishment’s pick in key Wisconsin districtRebecca Cooke will get the rematch she sought with Republican Rep. Derrick Van Orden in southwestern Wisconsin after she fended off progressive rival Emily Berge, the former Eau Claire city council president, in the 3rd District Democratic primary.It was a key race, with the Driftless Area congressional district looking like one of Democrats’ prime pick-up opportunities after Cooke, a small business owner and waitress who highlights her background as the daughter of dairy farmers, came within 3 percentage points of ousting Van Orden in a political environment more favorable to the GOP in 2024.Establishment Democrats are backing Cooke, who has proven to be a strong fundraiser. But the race wasn’t a traditional progressive-versus-moderate showdown. Cooke has distanced herself from left-leaning policies like defunding the police and abolishing Immigration and Customs Enforcement. But she was also endorsed by Sanders, and aired a television advertisement focused solely on highlighting the Vermont senator’s support.The biggest question entering Election Day was whether a progressive wave led by Hong would also sweep Berge to a surprise victory. But that surge did not materialize on Tuesday.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story