Skip to main content

One Utah community will keep its fireworks ban even if the rest of the state doesn’t

Click here for updates on this story

    MOAB, Utah (KSTU) — With Utah’s emergency order banning fireworks set to expire next week, at least one city has decided it will continue a fireworks ban.

Moab’s City Council voted to declare a state of emergency and ban fireworks before Governor Spencer Cox decided to issue his own emergency order that led to a statewide ban. It was for the entire month of July.

“You could see the smoke coming in from the Babylon Fire,” Moab Fire Chief TJ Brewer told FOX 13 News. “We were getting concern from the community.”

The Babylon Fire, burning about an hour south of Moab, is the nation’s largest wildfire, having torched more than 106,000 acres. As of Wednesday, it is only 54% contained. It is one of many wildfires still burning across the state that has destroyed property and forced entire communities to evacuate.

Utah is in drought and wildfire conditions are extreme. Grasses and trees are dry, allowing fires to spread. So far, more than 382,000 acres have burned and the majority of fires are human-caused. Firefighters have pleaded with Utahns to do what they can to avoid sparking more wildfires.

When Moab declared a state of emergency and enacted a ban, it was testing state laws that blocked cities and towns from enacting all-out fireworks bans except in limited circumstances (such as when a community is entirely in a wildland area).

“It’s a little creative, I think. It was a way for us to really come up with some legislative backing to allow us to do that and we just really believe that fire is a huge issue,” Moab Mayor Joette Langianese said in an interview with FOX 13 News last month.

Then, Gov. Cox declared a state of emergency because of extreme wildfire risk and suspended the laws. It allowed the Utah State Forester to issue an order declaring a statewide fireworks ban — but giving cities the power to allow fireworks with restrictions. It also gave communities like Moab some political backing for enacting fireworks bans.

Utah State Forester Jamie Barnes told FOX 13 News last week that she is still evaluating whether to seek a new emergency order for the upcoming Pioneer Day holiday, but wildfire conditions had not improved. Gov. Cox’s office said Wednesday he was still reviewing things and no decision has been made.

Under laws passed by the Utah State Legislature during the COVID pandemic, a governor’s emergency order is only good for 30 days. Then the legislature has to meet in special session to vote on extending the ban. Gov. Cox could issue a brand new emergency order.

But if Gov. Cox opts not to issue a new order to cover the Pioneer Day holiday, Moab’s ban would remain in effect. Brewer said residents were supportive of the ban over the Fourth of July.

“The community has stood behind it. We thought we might have some complaints. We’ve had zero complaints that I’ve heard of,” he said. “We had zero firework incidents on the Fourth of July, which is outstanding. We usually have at least a dozen or so, but there was zero. We ended up having a structure fire that day but it had nothing to do with fireworks.”

Please note: This story was provided to CNN Wire by an affiliate and does not contain original CNN reporting. This content carries a strict local market embargo. If you share the same market as the contributor of this article, you may not use it on any platform.

Fact check: Every single part of this Trump story about South Korea is wrong

(CNN) — President Donald Trump told a story about South Korea on Monday. Every single part of it is false.Trump has delivered versions of his fictional story before; CNN debunked one telling last year. The president delivered Monday’s version the day after he announced the US would reduce military exercises with South Korea – citing his “very good relationship” with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un and also mentioning that South Korea declined to participate in the US war with Iran.The latest version of Trump’s tale, which you can watch in full here, went like this:South Korea “essentially” didn’t pay for the cost of the US military presence in the country before Trump first became president. Trump then got South Korea to unhappily agree to pay “$3 billion” in a year, with further increases the following year and the year after that. But then the 2020 election was “rigged” against him. When Joe Biden became president, South Korea convinced Biden that Trump was “probably a bad person” and they shouldn’t have to pay the money, so Biden “immediately rescinded” Trump’s “order.”Let’s walk through why all of this is wrong. The facts show that Trump’s comments include at least five separate inaccurate claims – in addition to his usual exaggeration of the size of the US military presence in South Korea, which he put at “39,000” but the Pentagon said was actually 26,589 as of the end of March.South Korea was paying for the US military presence before Trump’s first presidency.Here’s what Trump claimed Monday: “Just so you understand with South Korea, look: South Korea has been protected by us for many, many years, and during my first term, they agreed to pay close to $3 billion a year for protection, because we don’t – you know, they essentially weren’t paying.” Last year, he explicitly said South Korea’s cost-sharing payments didn’t exist before he became president.The reality: For decades before Trump took office, South Korea spent substantial sums to share the cost of the US military presence in the country; its cost-sharing “Special Measures Agreements” with the US began in 1991. Under the final five-year agreement signed before Trump became president in 2017, negotiated by the Obama administration, South Korea agreed to spend more than $800 million per year from 2014 through 2018. Trump is entitled to argue that this was insufficient, but it was far from not paying at all.It’s not true that Trump got South Korea to pay “$3 billion” in any year.Here’s what Trump claimed Monday: “But we agreed for a short term that it would be $3 billion…” Later in his remarks, he referred to the supposed arrangement as “$3 billion a year” from South Korea.The reality: Under a one-year Special Measures Agreement negotiated by the Trump administration in 2019, South Korea agreed to an 8.2% increase in its spending – but the new total was still less than $1 billion, not $3 billion.It’s not true that Trump got South Korea to agree to two subsequent increases.Here’s what Trump claimed Monday: “But we agreed for a short term that it would be $3 billion, and next year it would go up and the next year it would go up, so that they start paying for their protection.”The reality: Trump did not secure three years of spending increases. He did achieve the one-year increase for 2019, but negotiations on a post-2019 deal stalled amid Trump’s demands for a massive increase in South Korea’s contribution, and the talks were still unresolved when Biden took office in January 2021.South Korea did come to a narrower deal with the Trump administration in mid-2020 to spend $200 million that year to pay South Korean employees of US forces, who had been put on leave because Trump’s one-year deal expired at the end of 2019. Clearly, though, that wasn’t two years of spending hikes over the supposed “$3 billion.”It’s not true that the 2020 election was rigged.Here’s what Trump claimed Monday: “When the election was rigged and I ended up watching for four years and then coming back…”The reality: Trump was lying. He lost the 2020 election fair and square to Biden.It’s not true that Biden agreed to a South Korean demand to rescind Trump’s cost-sharing deal.Here’s what Trump claimed Monday: “And South Korea, I get along with them very well. But they were paying $3 billion a year and then they convinced Biden that I was probably a bad person and they shouldn’t. And he immediately rescinded that order.”The reality: Biden did not rescind any Trump cost-sharing agreement with South Korea. The only Special Measures Agreement signed by the Trump administration, the one-year 2019 deal, was dead by the time Biden took office in 2021 – and Biden’s administration proceeded to sign two new agreements, one in 2021 and one in 2024, that both included South Korean spending increases.The 2021 agreement – which retroactively covered Trump-era 2020 – included a South Korean spending increase of 13.9% in 2021, bringing the level to around $1 billion, then additional increases in 2022 through 2025 tied to increases in South Korea’s defense budget. The 2024 agreement included an 8.3% increase in 2026 and then additional increases from 2027 to 2030 tied to South Korean inflation.These were smaller hikes than Trump was demanding when he left office in early 2021. But, again, South Korea had not actually agreed to those Trump demands.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story