Skip to main content

Maine Democrats’ first debate laid bare their difficulty in replacing Graham Platner

(CNN) — As Maine Democrats prepare to replace Graham Platner as their Senate nominee, eight candidates pitched themselves as best prepared to take on Republican Sen. Susan Collins over two hours of debates Thursday night.

The first hour featured four candidates who were on the primary ballot in different races this year. All lost — but all earned at least 20% of the vote in their contests.

Former public health official Nirav Shah pointed to his performance in the gubernatorial primary (he earned the most first-place votes, but finished second once ranked-choice votes were tabulated). Former Maine Senate President Troy Jackson touted his state-level accomplishments. Maine Secretary of State Shenna Bellows highlighted her attempt to disqualify President Donald Trump from the 2024 ballot. Former Capitol Hill staffer Jordan Wood said he’d be best able to separate himself politically from Platner.

The second hour was an undercard of sorts, with four lesser-known candidates looking to break through in the abbreviated race. Among them was Dan Kleban, the Maine Beer Company founder who last year entered the Senate race, but ended his campaign after Democratic Gov. Janet Mills jumped in with the party establishment’s support. Mills would ultimately suspend her campaign in April as she trailed Platner in the polls.

“I think people are sick and tired of career politicians,” Kleban said as he sought to vault into the top tier of Democrats in the race.

The debate laid bare the reality of how difficult replacing Platner and mounting a serious challenge against Collins will be. None of the candidates in Thursday night’s debate could replicate the political skills that allowed Platner to emerge as a viral sensation, elbow a two-term governor out of the race and poll neck-and-neck with Collins before he ended his campaign after a woman accused him of rape – allegations he has denied. Shah’s delivery was one-note and Bellows’ was halting. Wood often turned to his notes. Jackson frequently cleared his throat and changed directions mid-sentence.

It all comes ahead of a July 25 convention at which Maine Democrats will select Platner’s replacement on the ballot. The candidates are making their cases to an extremely small audience: The nominee will be chosen at a convention of 601 delegates, including 101 members of the Democratic State Committee and 500 chosen from the state’s 16 counties in local meetings this weekend.

Here are takeaways from the Maine Senate debate night:

Platner’s shadow

A political certainty in the lead-up to November is that Republicans will seek to tie the Democratic Senate nominee to Platner. Those vying for the nomination Thursday night did little to discourage that comparison as they touted their progressive bona fides.

Wood noted that, as he campaigned for the Senate nomination last fall before switching to a House bid, he’d been quick to call for Platner to drop out of the race amid earlier controversies. But none of the major candidates recounted the details of the allegations he faced, and all eagerly embraced some of Platner’s political positions when asked by the moderators what they would take forward from his campaign.

Jackson said that like Platner, he supports Medicare for All. Shah said that he also supports abolishing US Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

Wood said Platner was right to call Israel’s actions in Gaza a genocide, and said that “it is so important in these moments to draw those moral lines.” And Bellows said Platner was right to say that “‘the democracy we thought we had has been deeply corrupted.”

Furor over ICE shooting

Also looming over Thursday night’s debate: the fatal shooting of Joan Sebastián Durán Guerrero by an ICE officer in Biddeford on Monday.

Shah raised it in his opening statement, lambasting the Trump administration: “I’m angry that there’s a 3-year-old girl that’s never going to see her father again,” he said.

But all four took shots at the agency, saying it should be abolished or – in Bellows’ case – that she wanted ICE out of Maine and remembered the United States before the agency’s 2003 creation.

“I remember a day when the thugs weren’t in the government, and they didn’t have arms,” Bellows said.

Jackson said he supports law enforcement but that ICE “is not law enforcement.”

“It’s a rogue agency that goes around doing things that they’re being told to on high,” he argued. “They give us nothing in this country but heartache and racism.”

Wood said ICE agents should be banned from wearing masks, and should be required to display identification and wear body cameras.

Shah said he thinks about his immigrant mother, who didn’t speak English when she first came to the country, and “how terrified she would have been had she known the president’s goons were patrolling the streets and might snatch her up.”

“The rot has gone to the core, and that’s why we must abolish it,” Shah said.

Debating Collins, not each other

Thursday night’s debate did very little to draw out differences among the candidates — all of whom trained their criticism toward Collins, the five-term Republican incumbent, and Trump, rather than other candidates in the Democratic race.

That could be in part because the party’s July 25 convention could require several rounds of voting — with candidates’ cross-endorsements and alliances playing a pivotal role in the ultimate outcome.

Shah had the most polished delivery, and the most unique material. He chided Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth as “obsessed with testosterone levels of troops,” rather than focused on the challenges of drones and artificial intelligence, and said he should be booted from Trump’s Cabinet.

Jackson sought to frame his campaign in working-class terms, saying he was running “so that everyday people get a government that they deserve.”

But at no point did the top candidates clash over policy differences or challenge each other’s claims of electability or preparedness for what’s likely be one of the nation’s hardest-fought Senate races this fall.

Candidates will have another chance to make their cases on July 23, when CNN will host a debate in partnership with the Bangor Daily News.

The-CNN-Wire
™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.

JD Vance and the Trump team keep moving the goalposts on Iran

(CNN) — One of the Trump administration’s biggest problems in extracting itself from the Iran war is the list of very absolutist goals that President Donald Trump and his team laid out.The goals have included complete Iranian surrender, regime change, Iran never getting a nuclear weapon and ending Tehran’s support for its Middle East proxy groups like Hezbollah.As the war — now in its sixth month — has dragged on, this list of goals has conspicuously shifted and been pared back. And Vice President JD Vance appears to have pared it back recently in a remarkable way, offering the latest indication that the administration might be preparing to settle for less — maybe even a lot less.Appearing on Fox News on Thursday, Vance was asked how the war might end. And he laid out two goals.“It’s ensuring that the Gulf countries continue to send oil and gas to the world economy so that we have energy price stability,” he said, adding: “That’s goal number one: Keep oil and gas cheap for Americans all over our country.“And then, obviously, goal number two is ensure that Iran never gets a nuclear weapon.”This is not the administration’s old list of goals — and the order Vance placed them in is striking.When asked about Vance’s comments on Friday, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt maintained that “both goals are equally as important to the president.”The administration has almost always characterized Iran never getting a nuclear weapon as the overriding concern.And even if the goals are truly equal in the administration’s mind, including oil and gas prices at all — and not other items — is a notable shift.In fact, Trump explicitly rejected this as a goal back in May. When asked if he considered Americans’ financial situation when trying to resolve the war, Trump responded, “Not even a little bit.” He signaled that denuclearization was so important that he didn’t factor in anything else.(Trump echoed that line on Friday, saying he would “never apologize” for Americans paying a little more for gas, given the stakes in Iran.)I wrote in March about how the administration frequently listed four goals for the war — but how the four goals frequently differed depending upon who was speaking.Some lists included ending funding for proxy groups, for example, while others did not. Some mentioned destroying Iran’s missile infrastructure, while others omitted that. Some mentioned getting rid of Iran’s air force and navy, but others only mentioned the navy.It was like the administration was workshopping the list in real time.But the key point here is that none of those lists included keeping oil and gas prices low in the United States.And given the Strait of Hormuz was open before the war started, that particular goal could just be read as a return to the pre-war status quo — with denuclearization being the only goal that would represent a new achievement.Indeed, the new emphasis on low gas prices from some in the administration seems like the latest sign of relaxing the goals to prepare for a conclusion to the war that comes up well shy of Trump’s initial aims.By May, it became clear the administration was no longer going to emphasize certain goals.By June, the Trump administration entered into a memorandum of understanding with Iran that barely mentioned previously central US goals.And for the last two-plus months, Trump has been saying things that sounded a lot like he might scale back his nuclear demands.While the administration previously emphasized Iran turning over its enriched uranium, Trump’s spoken about how perhaps enough damage was done to its nuclear program and its nuclear materials are buried too far underground to be accessed. The president has also talked about how the US government could simply monitor from space to make sure Iran didn’t try to retrieve them.He’s even claimed that Iran was already denuclearized.In other words, Trump sounded a lot like a guy who knew he might not be able to cow Iran into accepting a really restrictive nuclear deal.His administration talking about energy prices as “goal number one” — even if Trump isn’t — would fit neatly with this progression away from the hard-and-fast goals that the administration set out to achieve.If a return to the pre-war status quo really is “goal number one” right now, that says a lot about how little this war has accomplished.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story