Skip to main content

Lawyers for Kristin Ramsey file to dismiss murder case, citing inconsistencies from witness

By CNN

IA: REALTOR MURDER CASE/WOMAN SEEKS DISMISSAL

Click here for updates on this story

    DES MOINES, Iowa (KCCI) — Lawyers for a woman accused of killing an Iowa realtor in 2011 say the prosecution’s key eyewitness changed their story in the days after the killing.

Kristin Ramsey is accused of killing Ashley Okland on April 8, 2011, while Okland was holding an open house at a townhome in West Des Moines. Ramsey was arrested nearly 15 years later and charged with first-degree murder.

Now, Ramsey’s lawyers are arguing for the case to be thrown out due to inconsistencies with what it calls “the State’s only eyewitness.”

Ramsey’s lawyers argue the witness, who was not identified by name in a motion to dismiss filed Friday, told police on multiple occasions that Ramsey did not arrive to the scene until after the shooting.

“On April 9, 2011—the day after the murder—the neighbor gave a third statement,” the motion reads. “She once again told Detective [Jeff] Lyon … that about ‘3 minutes after hearing the noises she noticed a white female drive up to unit 558 in a silver 4 door car and enter the unit. [The neighbor] said seconds after the women entered the building she observed the same female run from the building and drive away in her car very quickly.’ … Again, according to the neighbor, Ms. Ramsey did not arrive to the scene until after the shots were fired.”

The motion then details how the neighbor’s story changed a few days later. According to Ramsey’s lawyers, a detective told the neighbor she was “the prime suspect” on April 14. The neighbor’s story then changed, according to the defense, and she omitted details about seeing Ramsey drive up several minutes after the shooting, instead focusing her story on seeing Ramsey outside the townhome minutes later.

The neighbor also had a traumatic brain injury that impacted her memory, according to the defense:

“During the interview, the investigators, including Detective Lyon, pushed the neighbor on the inconsistencies in her statement, such as her now inability to recall the color of the cars outside the townhome,” the motion reads. “She responded by saying that ‘I had a concussion from a fractured skull, I do have some memory problems . . . I spend a lot of time, on things, like, I see trying to remember things.'”

When interviewed again by investigators in 2025, nearly 15 years after the shooting, the neighbor, now living in Florida, told investigators she did not remember who Ramsey was, according to the defense.

Please note: This story was provided to CNN Wire by an affiliate and does not contain original CNN reporting. This content carries a strict local market embargo. If you share the same market as the contributor of this article, you may not use it on any platform.

Who is Elon Musk calling a ‘traitor’?

By CNN
(CNN) — Elon Musk recently sat for a wide-ranging interview with The Economist editor-in-chief Zanny Minton Beddoes, who challenged him over his support for Europe’s far right, his anti-Muslim rhetoric and his cuts to humanitarian aid during his stint in the Trump administration.Afterwards, on his own social media network that he routinely uses to amplify his personal views, Musk lashed out against his interviewer. “She is a traitor to the West, plain and simple,” he wrote.By Musk’s assessment, society is full of “traitors.” As he declared over the weekend, “anyone who opposes remigration is a traitor.” So is “anyone who doesn’t love America.” He has also leveled the charge at Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, Arizona Sen. Mark Kelly, Minnesota Rep. Ilhan Omar and Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, to name a few. CNN has reached out to Musk for comment.“Traitor” — which derives via Old French from the Latin “trādēre,” meaning to hand over — was first recorded in English in the early 13th century to describe a person who violated another’s trust or a duty entrusted to them. By the end of the century, it also encompassed betrayals of one’s sovereign or government. Being a traitor is a mark of infamy that carries down through history, attached to the likes of Marcus Junius Brutus, who conspired to assassinate Julius Caesar; Judas Iscariot, who betrayed Jesus for 30 pieces of silver; Benedict Arnold, who deceived George Washington and the Continental Army; and Vidkun Quisling, a Norwegian military officer who collaborated with Nazi Germany during World War II.In the legal sense, a “traitor” is someone found guilty of the crime of treason, which also derives from the Latin “trādēre” and seems to have entered English around the same time as “traitor.”Article III of the US Constitution stipulates that “Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.” This narrow definition was a deliberate attempt by the Founding Fathers to shape political culture, said Thomas Main, author of “The Rise of Illiberalism” and a professor at Baruch College.In “Federalist No. 43,” James Madison warned against “new-fangled and artificial treasons” invented by political factions to use against one another whenever power changes hands. “[T]he convention have, with great judgment, opposed a barrier to this peculiar danger, by inserting a constitutional definition of the crime,” he wrote.“It’s because he doesn’t want newfangled definitions of treason to be used as weapons in everyday debate between political factions,” Main said. “The result of that is a political culture that is intolerant, which is not consistent with liberal democracy.”Despite the founders’ efforts, the words “traitor,” and its relative “treason,” have been invoked throughout US history in more expansive ways. What sort of betrayals might spark such accusations? Often, the allegiances in question seemed to be drawn along lines of race.The mid-20th century saw the rise of the phrase “race traitor,” applied by segregationists and the Ku Klux Klan to white people who aligned themselves with the Civil Rights Movement. Catherine Fosl, a historian and author of the biography “Subversive Southerner” of white civil rights activist Anne Braden, said that when Braden and her husband bought a house on behalf of a Black family in 1954, the phrase appeared frequently in the hate mail they received.“It’s often paired with charges of socialism, communism, outsider,” she said in an interview. “It connotes ‘They’re not like us. They’re not part of us, and they want to undermine our way of life.’”Fosl, who has also taught South African history, said the word “traitor” was similarly applied to dissenters against apartheid in Musk’s native country, South Africa. The government there charged Nelson Mandela and more than 150 other anti-apartheid activists with treason in a multi-year mass trial that ended in acquittal in 1961.By the ’90s, the idea of the “race traitor” was so ingrained in US political discourse that it was reclaimed by some activists on the left. In 1993, the steelworker-turned-scholar Noel Ignatiev and the cab driver-turned-educator John Garvey began publishing the journal “Race Traitor” — eagerly embracing the once-derogatory label. “It wasn’t exactly an everyday phrase,” Garvey said, “But it was just below the surface of what people thought when so-called whites made common cause with especially Black folks.”Garvey said the journal, which published quarterly from 1993 to 2005, was premised on the idea of abolishing whiteness as a social category that situates white people above other racial groups. Under the motto “treason to whiteness is loyalty to humanity,” he said that he and his co-editor Ignatiev hoped to inspire a mass movement of “race traitors” that would eventually transform the country.Garvey and Ignatiev’s vision didn’t exactly come to pass. And political shifts that were set in motion decades earlier would eventually lay the foundation for the right’s use of “traitor” today. With the rise of modern conservatism in the ’70s and ’80s, Main said influential figures on the right began to approach politics as war. The right-wing FrontPage magazine, edited by former leftist-turned-conservative activist David Horowitz, frequently referred to everyday Democrats and liberals as “traitors,” as Main noted in a 2020 analysis. Ann Coulter’s 2003 book “Treason: Liberal Treachery from the Cold War to the War on Terrorism” similarly promoted the idea that liberal political views amounted to crimes against the US.“If you then say, ‘Well, all politics is war,’ that means everybody who doesn’t agree with me politically is a traitor,” Main said.This is the framing that Musk — and much of the US political right — seems to have adopted today. President Donald Trump deploys the epithet “traitor” at anyone he perceives to be as disloyal, as he did with former GOP Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene when she broke with him over the release of the Jeffrey Epstein files. MAGA influencers, including New Jersey political strategist Mike Crispi, accused Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett of betraying Republicans for voting to uphold states’ post-election grace periods for mail-in ballots. “Amy Coney Barrett is quite literally a traitor to our country,” he wrote on X. “Up until a few years ago, elections were ALWAYS finalized on Election NIGHT. We all know why the Democrats changed this process. So why did Barrett just vote to uphold it?”The decades-old “race traitor” has seen a resurgence, too. After Renee Good and Alex Pretti were killed by federal agents while demonstrating against the Trump administration’s deportation campaign, the white supremacist influencer Nick Fuentes called them “race traitors.” Fuentes has also referred to Vice President JD Vance as a “race traitor” for marrying a woman of Indian heritage.When Musk calls someone a “traitor,” he seems to regard the word as the utmost insult. His contempt for so-called “traitors” is so great that in recent weeks, he’s repeatedly posted or reposted versions of the far-right meme “first the traitors, then the invaders.” The slogan refers to the idea among anti-immigrant extremists that before targeting immigrants themselves, they need to attack people who support immigration; Musk reposted a user who applied the message to the new Uwe Boll movie, “Citizen Vigilante,” to explain why the protagonist, played by Armie Hammer, “spends the first half of the movie murdering white people not migrants.”In white supremacist circles, the idea goes back to a key plot point in the 1978 racist novel “The Turner Diaries,” which depicts a group of white people who hunt down and execute “race traitors,” before going on to wipe all non-white people from the face of the earth. The book — with its treatment of racial integration as equivalent to the death-penalty federal crime of treason — has inspired numerous acts of racist violence through the years since its publication.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story

Related Stories

Latest News
CNN Poll: A third of Democrats now identify as democratic socialists
19 minutes ago

CNN Poll: A third of Democrats now identify as democratic socialists

CNN Poll: Voters favor Democrats by an 8-point margin heading into the midterms

His son was just sentenced to life without parole for a school shooting. Today, Colin Gray learns his own fate

White House levels new allegation that China swept up voter data

Las 5 cosas que debes saber este 30 de julio