Skip to main content

In scathing report, White House accuses Smithsonian of presenting ‘a radical view of American history’

A Smithsonian Institution sign is seen on the National Air and Space Museum on the National Mall on March 28, 2025 in Washington, DC. (Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)

(WASHINGTON) — The White House released a scathing 162-page report accusing the Smithsonian Institution of engaging in “extreme political activism” and presenting “a radical view of American history.”

The report, which was published on Saturday, July 4, particularly took aim at the Smithsonian’s National Museum of American History (NMAH), accusing its leadership of adopting “an ideological framework that no longer treats the American story as a shared national inheritance to be taught or celebrated, but as a political instrument to divide, dispirit, and discourage our citizens.”

The report accuses the museum of “anti-White activism,” “illegal alien activism,” and “transgender activism.” It also includes many photos of materials the White House has identified as problematic.

Asked about the report, a spokesperson for the Smithsonian, which oversees 21 museums, galleries and the national zoo, told ABC News that the institution remains committed to impartial learning.

“For more than 180 years, the Smithsonian has served the American public with nonpartisan and independent scholarship, and we remain committed to doing so,” the spokesperson said on Sunday.

In his most recent public comments, Smithsonian Secretary Lonnie Bunch told NBC’s “Meet the Press” in an interview that aired Sunday morning that the institution is “in pursuit of the promise of America.”

The report, which was published by the White House’s Domestic Policy Council, comes amid an ongoing White House review of the Smithsonian as well as a separate internal review launched by the Smithsonian into its own exhibits and processes. Asked about the status of the internal review, a spokesperson for the Smithsonian did not comment.

The White House review was launched in response to President Donald Trump’s March 27, 2025 executive order, “Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History.”

The executive order directed Vice President J.D. Vance, in consultation with the president’s advisers on domestic policy, “to remove improper ideology” from Smithsonian institutions, arguing that materials that cast America in a “negative light” have no place in federal cultural institutions.

“The serious concerns raised in this report are not about a few exhibits or a few controversial labels,” the report says. “As it stands today, it would benefit most Americans, especially parents bringing their children for a tour, if the Smithsonian’s flagship history museum had a label at every entrance that reads: ‘Warning: the exhibits in this museum were prepared by people who don’t want you to love your country.'”

What’s in the report?

The report includes dozens of examples of exhibits and materials in exhibits that the White House has determined to be examples of “radical activism.”

For instance, the report highlights an exhibit titled “Many Voices, One Nation,” and claims that its contents attempt “to instill within visitors its belief that migration and immigration, including the granting of citizenship to illegal aliens, is a defining modern-day civil rights and human liberty issue.”

The report also takes issue with displays about transgender people, including an exhibit titled “Girlhood” that profiled transgender media personality and LGBTQ+ rights advocate Jazz Jennings.

“One of the clearest examples of NMAH’s radical ideology is its refusal to correctly identify or define what a woman is,” the report states — reinforcing language from Trump’s January 2025 executive order, which outlined that this administration’s policy would be to “recognize two sexes, male and female” based on biology.

Overall, the report takes issue with materials addressing “white supremacy,” “racism” and the country’s history of “slavery,” “conquest” and “exclusion.”

The report claims that the museum fails to substantially represent the founders of the United States and that the exhibits cast America as “a problematic country irredeemably conceived, founded by deeply flawed men, and still operating today as an instrument of systemic racism and oppression.”

Sarah Weicksel, executive director of the American Historical Association, previously told ABC News that the White House is seeking to create “a narrowly sanitized version of the American past” at federal cultural institutions “that fits comfortably” into Trump’s executive order.

The American Historical Association (AHC), which represents 10,000 historians across various educational and cultural institutions in the U.S., has publicly defended the Smithsonian and urged the White House to “respect and value the expertise of the historians, curators, and other museum professionals who conduct the review and revision of historical content according to the professional standards of our discipline.”

ABC News reached out to AHA for further comment.

What comes next?

The report does not specify action points related to correcting the so-called “activism,” but does reference the fact that the Smithsonian Institution is largely funded by the federal government and U.S. taxpayers.

“That means the public has a right to expect that it will operate as a faithful steward of the Nation’s historic and cultural heritage, not as a vehicle for ideological campaigns,” the report says.

According to the Smithsonian Institution, which oversees 21 museums and galleries and the national zoo, it currently receives more than $1 billion in federal funding — about 62% of its funding — and the remainder of the funds come from “trust funds or non-federal funds, including contributions from private sources” and revenues from Smithsonian enterprises.

Bunch has been leading the Smithsonian since 2019 but the institution is overseen by a 17-member governing body, known as the Board of Regents. Bunch, who met with Trump at the White House on Aug. 28, 2025, repeatedly affirmed the Smithsonian’s “independence” from political influence.

Referencing his conversations with Trump in a Sept. 3, 2025 letter to the institution’s employees, Bunch underscored the independence of the Smithsonian, saying it was “paramount.” He also told employees that the institution remains committed to telling the “American story” and “will always be, a place that welcomes all Americans and the world.”

Copyright © 2026, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

Target se disculpa por disfraz de payaso para niños de Halloween tras la polémica

Target se disculpó el lunes y anunció que había retirado de la venta un disfraz de Halloween que representaba a un payaso de circo que, según los críticos, evocaba la práctica de pintarse la cara de negro y los espectáculos de juglares.El producto, vendido como el “Disfraz de payaso de circo para niños que brilla bajo luz negra” para Halloween, provocó una fuerte reacción en las redes sociales, y algunos consumidores afirmaron que se parecía a una caricatura racista.“Como empresa, sabemos que nos equivocamos y lo lamentamos profundamente”, declaró Target en un comunicado. “El disfraz es ofensivo y nunca debió haber formado parte de nuestro catálogo. Ya no está a la venta”.Este es el último quebradero de cabeza para la imagen pública de la cadena minorista estadounidense, que intenta enderezar el rumbo tras un periodo de bajas ventas.La compañía también ha recibido críticas por la gestión de los productos de su Colección Orgullo 2023 y por los cambios en sus iniciativas de diversidad, equidad e inclusión tras el regreso del presidente Donald Trump a la Casa Blanca.Target declinó hacer comentarios sobre quién diseñó el producto —que se vendió bajo las marcas de temporada Hyde y EEK Boutique— o sobre el proceso por el cual se aprobó su venta.En su comunicado, Target afirmó que estaba “analizando detenidamente cómo ocurrió esto y qué cambios son necesarios”.Algunos compradores afroamericanos, que se sintieron marginados tras los retrocesos en materia de diversidad, equidad e inclusión (DEI) de Target en 2025, expresaron su decepción el lunes.Sheletta Brundidge, empresaria del área de Minneapolis, considera que el disfraz es una consecuencia indirecta de la decisión sobre DEI. “Redujeron la diversidad”, indicó, “así que, ¿quién está ahora para decir: “Esto está mal”?”.En su comunicado, Target reconoció que el disfraz era “especialmente hiriente para nuestros clientes, miembros del equipo y socios negros”.Aunque Hyde y EEK son marcas propiedad de Target, sus productos se han revendido en sitios web de minoristas como Walmart y Amazon, así como en la plataforma Etsy. Reuters no encontró el artículo en cuestión en dichos sitios.Una portavoz de Walmart declaró desconocer que se estuviera vendiendo. Amazon y Etsy no respondieron de inmediato a las solicitudes de comentarios.Target, que ha encadenado dos trimestres consecutivos con excelentes resultados, está empezando a ver los frutos de sus esfuerzos por bajar los precios y renovar su mercancía, y su nuevo director ejecutivo, Michael Fiddelke, ya ha recibido elogios de Wall Street.Pero la compañía, que no puede competir con Walmart y Costco en precio, tiene poco margen de error en lo que respecta a fallos de gestión o de imagen, declaró Brett Husslein, analista de Morningstar.“Ahora que Target empieza a recuperar terreno en la recuperación de su reputación de marca, este es precisamente el tipo de cosas que quieren evitar”, comentó, y añadió que cualquier obstáculo, ya sea de índole visual, administrativa o macroeconómica, “podría provocar mayores pérdidas de cuota de mercado”.Las acciones de Target subieron un 2,7 % en la sesión de la tarde.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story