Skip to main content

How Trump admin cuts have compromised food safety

▶ Watch Video: How Trump admin cuts have compromised food safety

A tiny microbe has been making a lot of Americans sick. Really sick. Just ask Jessica Mallard. “I wasn’t feeling well. The pain in my stomach was, like, unbearable,” she said.

The parasite is called cyclospora, It gives you (and I’m sorry to have to say this) debilitating, explosive diarrhea that can last for weeks. Since May, more than 11,000 cases of this miserable illness have been reported in 41 states. 

“I’m still fatigued,” said Mallard. “Like, I’m really, really weak.”

The FDA believes that the biggest outbreak this season, the one affecting nine states so far, came to us aboard contaminated iceberg lettuce from Mexico. That lettuce was shipped nationwide by Taylor Farms, a huge distributor that supplies thousands of groceries and restaurants.

“We’ve never seen anything like this,” said Susan Mayne, an adjunct professor at the Yale School of Public Health, who ran the food-safety department of the Food and Drug Administration from 2015 to 2023. “This is just an astonishingly large outbreak, record-setting outbreak.”

Cyclospora comes from human feces. How could that get on the lettuce? “It could be inadequate bathroom facilities, inadequate hand-washing facilities,” said Mayne. “Somehow that water is getting contaminated from some other source – sewage, some other source.”

Almost half of all foodborne illnesses comes from fruits and vegetables, in part because we usually don’t cook them before eating. These outbreaks are also financially devastating – to farmers, suppliers, and restaurants. 

And so, after a 2006 spinach contamination, when the FDA warned against eating spinach, nearly every grower of spinach in the country was affected. The West Coast farming industry resolved to self-regulate.

And so, the Leafy Greens Marketing Agreement (LGMA) was born – a coalition of farmers who have agreed to adopt food-safety protocols more stringent than the government’s. “They join voluntarily, but once they join, they must follow our rules,” said LGMA’s CEO Tim York.

Jack Vessey, a fourth-generation produce farmer in southern California, said, “We have to do it. Any kind of outbreak is detrimental to our industry.”

Vessey’s operation abides by the LGMA rules, which require sanitizing the irrigation water; testing it at the source and at the spraying end; hair nets and gloves; knife disinfectant; state inspections at least three times a year; and barcodes for tracing produce back to their original fields.

ca-farm-operating-under-leafy-greens-marketing-agreement.jpg
Farms participating in the Leafy Greens Marketing Agreement operate under food-safety rules that are more stringent than the government’s.

CBS News

But despite all of these precautions, outbreaks can still happen. 

“Outbreaks may occur because we are growing product outdoors,” said York. “Some bacteria just occur naturally within an environment. They just exist. And so, we control as much of the ecosystem as we can.”

Eventually, every discussion of food safety rolls around to the government. Susan Mayne acknowledged that food safety budgets have been under-resourced for decades.

But during President Trump’s second term, the FDA has lost about 20% of its staff; the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is down 25%. The CDC used to have 11 scientists tracking food parasites; now it’s three.

“We had a national advisory committee, a committee that advised FDA and USDA on how to prevent microbial contamination in food,” said Mayne. “That advisory committee was disbanded. We used to convene meetings with our Mexican counterparts on how we can work together to improve food safety. That entire team was let go.”

And then there’s FoodNet, a joint venture of the FDA, the CDC, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture that provided an early-warning surveillance program that used to track eight particularly nasty microbes. But now, it tracks only two – and cyclospora is not one of them.

foodnet-tracking.jpg
For three decades, the Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network (FoodNet), a collaboration among the CDC, FDA, USDA, and 10 state health departments, conducted surveillance for eight pathogens (including cyclospora). Since July 1, 2025, reporting on pathogens other than salmonella and e-coli has been made optional.

CBS News

In 2011, Congress passed a food-safety bill that included a Traceability Rule. It said that any food-related company must keep detailed supply-chain records for vulnerable ingredients, all the way from the fields to the store. It was supposed to take effect this year. “I can tell you, having seen lettuce tracebacks, that would’ve been incredibly helpful,” said Mayne. 

But the rule has been delayed until 2028.

So, if there is a cyclospora outbreak next year, we still won’t be able to trace it? “That’s correct,” replied Mayne. “Unless Congress or somebody else intervenes in the interim.”

This past week, Health and Human Services director Robert F. Kennedy Jr. told reporters that criticisms of the administration’s food safety programs were “invalid.”

“We’ve had no cuts in our surveillance program,” Kennedy said. “We did cuts in the FoodNet program, but they were for redundant surveillance.”

But Mayne says, “No, it’s not accurate. I mean, clearly there have been cuts.”

So, for now, what would be her advice for consumers? “I would avoid the bagged salads,” Mayne said. “And the reason is that a little bit of contamination can be spread more broadly through bagged salads.”

The former head of food safety says that this summer’s outbreaks are more than just another headline. “This is a national wake-up call,” Mayne said. “We want our dollars to be spent protecting public health, and protecting health. And so, I hope people will make that message clear, ’cause I haven’t talked to a single person from either party that wants to see unsafe food on our tables.”

      
For more info:

      
Story produced by Wonbo Woo. Editor: Jennifer Falk.

Juez ordena suspender el impuesto a las segundas residencias de Mamdani tras la demanda de los propietarios

Un juez de Staten Island bloqueó temporalmente el lunes la controvertida implementación del impuesto a las segundas residencias del alcalde de Nueva York, Zohran Mamdani, suspendiendo así la aplicación de una de sus principales promesas de campaña: gravar a los ricos.La orden del juez suspende la aplicación del recargo a las segundas residencias de alto valor en la ciudad mientras avanza una demanda presentada por un grupo de propietarios. El grupo alega que la ciudad incluyó erróneamente sus residencias principales en la lista de contribuyentes sujetos al impuesto.Bajo la orden de restricción temporal, la ciudad debe eliminar el registro público de contribuyentes y tiene prohibido emitir notificaciones adicionales mientras la orden esté vigente. La próxima audiencia está programada para el 31 de agosto.El juez declaró que las notificaciones de impuestos enviadas a los propietarios causaron un daño irreparable, ya que no explicaban por qué se les había incluido en la lista de contribuyentes sujetos al recargo ni advertían que quienes no solicitaran una exención estarían sujetos al impuesto.El fallo se produjo horas después de que Mamdani, en una conferencia de prensa el lunes por la mañana, prometiera defender enérgicamente la postura de la ciudad ante los tribunales.El impuesto sobre segundas residencias aplica un recargo a las viviendas no principales en la ciudad de Nueva York valoradas en al menos 5 millones de dólares, así como a los condominios y cooperativas valorados en un millón de dólares o más. Este impuesto se promulgó como parte del presupuesto estatal y se convirtió en ley en mayo, con el objetivo de reducir el déficit presupuestario de la ciudad. La gobernadora Kathy Hochul anunció la propuesta junto con Mamdani en abril y la promulgó.La demanda, presentada el viernes ante el Tribunal Supremo del estado en el condado Richmond, fue interpuesta por tres propietarios —Simon Hedley, Rachel O’Brien y Carmine Morano— quienes alegan que la ciudad identificó erróneamente sus viviendas como potencialmente sujetas al recargo, a pesar de que son sus residencias principales, según un comunicado de prensa.La demanda no cuestiona la legalidad del impuesto en sí, sino que impugna la publicación por parte de la ciudad de un registro fiscal que incluía los nombres, direcciones y valores de más de 900.000 propiedades residenciales de la ciudad de Nueva York —incluidas aquellas no sujetas al impuesto—, así como las notificaciones enviadas a algunos residentes. Aproximadamente 17.000 propietarios recibieron cartas alertándoles de que podrían estar sujetos al recargo.“Estamos muy satisfechos con la decisión del juez, que ha reivindicado los derechos de millones de propietarios de viviendas en la ciudad de Nueva York que fueron sometidos a un proceso del que nunca debieron haber formado parte”, declaró Randy Mastro, abogado de los demandantes.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story