Skip to main content

How Democrats could pick a new Maine Senate nominee to replace Graham Platner

▶ Watch Video: Graham Platner drops out of Senate race amid new sexual assault allegation

Washington — Democrats are facing a rapidly closing window to replace Maine Senate candidate Graham Platner, who dropped out of the race Wednesday following a sexual assault allegation.

At stake is one of the most closely watched and heavily contested Senate races of the year, as national Democrats seek to deny Republican Sen. Susan Collins a sixth term.

Platner’s insurgent campaign collapsed just days after a Maine woman he previously dated, Jenny Racicot, told Politico and CNN that Platner raped her in 2021 — an allegation he denied. Almost immediately, he faced calls to step aside from the Maine Democratic Party and top national Democrats, including figures who supported him through prior scandals

Even before Platner dropped out, several high-profile Maine Democrats hinted that they’re interested in replacing him on the ballot, and some former Platner allies began making the case that he should be replaced with a fellow progressive. The Maine Democratic Party accused Platner’s campaign of trying to “manipulate” the succession process.

The party will now have less than three weeks to pick a new candidate to go up against Collins. The exact process is not clear, but state Democratic officials have promised “transparency” — and say Platner himself will not be involved.

How could Platner be replaced?

Under state law, Platner had until Monday afternoon to withdraw from the race and remove his name from the general election ballot. Since he met that deadline, the Maine Democratic Party can replace him, but it must make a decision by July 27 at 5 p.m.

“If a political party makes a replacement nomination for the general election by the deadline,” the law says, “the Secretary of State shall produce new general election ballots or amend or supplement general election ballots already printed.” 

State law does not delineate how the party should choose a replacement. The Maine Democratic Party announced Wednesday it would hold a nominating convention to select a nominee, but it did not lay out a timeline or information on how the convention will work, saying it would announce more details “soon.” 

“We will keep the public informed throughout the process — transparency is of the utmost importance,” it said in a statement.

Candidates must file paperwork declaring their intent to seek the nomination by July 15, the party said late Thursday. The requirements include written statements from the candidate and at least 500 signatures from Democratic voters, with at least 50 signatures apiece from eight of Maine’s 16 counties.

In Maine politics, the sudden need to replace a nominee for statewide office appears to be unprecedented, Dan Shea, a political science professor at Colby College in Waterville, Maine, told CBS News. But national Democrats struggled with a similar dilemma two years ago, when former President Joe Biden dropped his reelection bid and was replaced by then-Vice President Kamala Harris.

“I think Maine Democrats are keeping in mind some of the controversy surrounding the … very narrow process leading to Kamala Harris’s nomination — the very quick, truncated process,” Shea said.

Who will replace Platner?

It’s unclear who the party will choose to replace Platner, who won last month’s primary with 72% of the vote. His top rival for the Democratic Senate nomination was outgoing Gov. Janet Mills, but she suspended her campaign before the primary election, and it’s not certain that the 78-year-old governor is interested in reentering the fray or would be viewed as a top contender.

The Democratic primary for governor was far more crowded, and some watchers of Maine politics told CBS News a few of the candidates who came up short in that race could be near the top of the list to replace Platner as Senate nominee. 

Three of those former gubernatorial candidates have already expressed interest: Maine Secretary of State Shenna Bellows, former state Senate President Troy Jackson and former Maine Center for Disease Control and Prevention Director Nirav Shah.

Jackson — a former Platner ally whose gubernatorial bid was backed by independent Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont — announced “I’m in” less than an hour after Platner dropped out. In a post on X, Jackson said “Maine deserves a Senator that will fight for working families.”

Bellows, who previously ran against Collins in 2014, announced her candidacy Thursday. 

“The people of Maine have been building a movement that deserves to continue all the way to November when we beat Susan Collins,” she said in a statement. 

Shah announced Thursday morning that he is throwing his hat in the ring. Shah told “CBS Mornings” on Thursday that Democrats are “feeling 1,000 emotions at once,” but “the one that is overriding is the eagerness and the commitment to defeating Susan Collins in the fall.” 

On Tuesday, Shah posted on social media that his team has “received hundreds of encouraging messages” in a statement that laid out his platform. Shah argued a new nominee should be chosen through a “transparent and open” process with at least one televised debate.

Another name that has circulated is state Rep. Valli Geiger, a former Platner supporter. Geiger told local TV station WMTW on Wednesday that Platner called her two days earlier and said he wanted to throw his support behind her. Platner has not publicly backed Geiger or any other potential replacement candidate.

Some former Senate candidates have also publicly entertained the idea of jumping in.

Maine Beer Company cofounder Dan Kleban, who launched a Senate campaign last year before abandoning it, announced Wednesday that he’s “in to replace Platner.” He wrote in a statement before Platner dropped out: “I’ve been overwhelmed by the countless calls from Mainers encouraging me to consider this race.”

Former U.S. House staffer Jordan Wood, a Lewiston native, announced on Thursday that he is seeking the nomination. Wood briefly ran for Senate last year before dropping out to run to replace Democratic Rep. Jared Golden in the House, a race he lost to State Auditor Matt Dunlap. (Golden’s team has told several news outlets he’s not interested in replacing Platner.)

Former House candidate Paige Loud and former Senate candidate David Costello have also signaled they plan to run.

Actor Patrick Dempsey, another Lewiston native who founded the Dempsey Center for cancer care, said Wednesday that he will not be seeking the nomination. In an op-ed in the Portland Press Herald, he called the speculation “flattering” but wrote that ultimately he is opting not to run. 

“Not because public service isn’t honorable — it absolutely is,” Dempsey wrote. “But because I believe I can contribute more effectively through the life I’ve already built.”

Will Platner have a say in his successor?

The Maine Democratic Party says no.

Shortly after the party called for Platner to drop out of the race, Executive Director Devon Murphy-Anderson wrote in a statement: “In no scenario is there a legal possibility for a nominee to be selected by an individual campaign.”

Murphy-Anderson was more forceful late Tuesday, saying in a video that Platner’s team “has repeatedly reached out to us in an attempt to put their thumb on the scale of what this process looks like.”

“We have repeatedly reiterated to Graham Platner’s team that they have no role in determining our next Democratic nominee for the U.S. Senate, nor in determining what this process looks like,” she said.

A Platner campaign spokesperson quickly fired back, denying that the campaign had tried to put its “finger on the scale” but arguing that Platner “would want to make sure the voters and volunteers make this decision — not the political establishment.”

In a mass text to supporters Wednesday, the campaign accused the party of trying to prevent their “movement” from having any say in who the candidate will be.

In a video Wednesday announcing the end of his campaign, Platner called for an “open, transparent and democratic” process that isn’t controlled by “party apparatchiks.”

Some of the national progressive groups that supported Platner before the sexual assault accusation came to light have argued the next nominee should broadly share Platner’s politics and outsider image.

“To the Democratic establishment: this is not your opening,” Our Revolution Executive Director Joseph Geevarghese wrote Monday evening. The group, which has its roots in Sanders’ 2016 presidential campaign, specifically warned against picking a “status-quo candidate” like Mills.

The Progressive Change Campaign Committee said in a statement shortly after Platner dropped out that the party “should immediately make clear that they will honor the record turnout in June’s primary — and the appetite for a candidate with a bold economic vision for working Americans — by running an open process that all Maine Democrats can participate in.”

One high-profile former Platner supporter — Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna of California — was more explicit, arguing Jackson should get the nomination because he “has spent his life standing up for … progressive values.”

But state Sen. Joe Baldacci argued on social media the new Democratic candidate “has to be someone who is independent minded from Platner, otherwise they will be viewed by voters as a protege.” Baldacci, who previously ran for the Democratic nomination to replace Golden, has said he isn’t personally interested in replacing Platner.

Do Democrats still have a chance of beating Susan Collins?

The Democratic nominee will face Collins, a moderate Republican who has long vexed her opponents in the blue-leaning state. 

In 2020, Collins defeated Democratic nominee Sara Gideon by an 8.6-point margin even as Biden won statewide in Maine by nine points, and six years earlier, Collins defeated Bellows by more than 30 points. Collins sits on the powerful Senate Appropriations Committee, and her campaigns usually zero in on the federal funding that she has secured for Maine.

Ronald Schmidt, a political science professor at the University of Southern Maine, said he thinks Collins will be “very difficult to beat” regardless of the eventual Democratic nominee.

“Sen. Collins is very, very good at running for reelection,” said Schmidt. “She’s got a group of people who, although they aren’t necessarily in her party or … aren’t necessarily huge fans of hers, think she can do the job, and so they vote for her again and again and again.”

Schmidt believes Democrats could still mount a competitive challenge to Collins even after swapping out Platner at the last minute, though he said it’s still an open question whether the party can “summon up the energy they need to get the big turnout that it would take to dislodge Susan Collins.”

Shea said he thinks an exit by Platner could make defeating Collins more likely. He argued that many Maine voters were “interested in making a change” from Collins and agreed with Platner’s political views, but “worried a lot about Graham Platner’s character.”

“My sense is that it may be a blessing in disguise,” he said.

Young Americans have higher credit scores today than before Covid

New York (CNN) — Kelly Klein graduated from college with $100,000 in student loans that she feared would haunt her forever.“I expected I’d never pay off my student debt,” said Klein, who is 31 years old.But flash forward 10 years and Klein is now debt-free, her retirement account is flush and her credit score is pristine.“Every commission check I earned for the first six years went to paying off my debt. Every single penny,” said Klein, who is based in Nashville, Tennessee, and works as a loan officer at a community development financial institution.While millions of Americans are hurting from high prices and low hiring, new research suggests the finances of younger generations are displaying surprising resilience.Americans between the ages of 18 and 29 have higher credit scores today than they did just before Covid-19, according to FICO research shared first with CNN.Not only that, but that youngest generation’s 17-point increase in average credit scores since 2019 is the biggest among any age group FICO measured. The second biggest increase in credit scores over that timeframe was for the 30-to-44 cohort, otherwise known as Millennials.Most of the gains occurred during the initial stages of the health emergency when student loan payments were paused.Experts say younger Americans have benefited from access to better education about the importance of protecting credit scores to hold down payments later in life.“Gen Z is pretty savvy about credit. And they are more aware of credit scores, in part because there have been so many economic headwinds during their lives,” said Matt Schulz, chief credit analyst at LendingTree.‘A lot more knowledge’Overall FICO scores fell slightly between April 2025 and April 2026. However, credit scores for Gen Z are up by one point over that timeframe and roughly half have a very strong FICO score of 700 or above.Klein, who is a Millennial, said she learned valuable lessons about finance and investing from experts on social media. Klein also said she joined a free webinar on opening a brokerage account and familiarized herself with tax strategies and how to maximize credit card rewards.“We have a lot more knowledge than previous generations did. A lot of it was gate-kept, especially from women, and tailored toward men. Luckily, I feel like financial education is more available,” she said.Another factor: Younger borrowers are at or near the beginning of their credit journeys, giving them the most room to grow their credit scores. FICO said it doesn’t take into consideration age when scoring borrowers, but it does evaluate how long someone has been able to successfully make payments on time.As consumers take on different kinds of debt — moving from just credit cards and student debt to car loans and mortgages — they open themselves up to being better borrowers. That’s a key factor in determining credit scores.Schulz compared younger Americans increasing their credit scores with a new driver borrowing Mom or Dad’s car.“The first few times they might put some real restrictions on you. But if you show you can handle it over time, they might not think at all about letting you borrow the car. Credit is very similar,” Schulz said. “Having time and experience handling credit responsibly leads to credit scores being higher.”K-shaped economy is evidentMore emphasis on being responsible borrowers may help explain why, at a high level, average credit scores for younger Americans have held up better than might be expected in today’s economic environment, where high-income earners have seen their wealth grow faster than low-income earners.As of April, nearly half (49.6%) of borrowers aged 18-29 had a strong credit score of 700 or above, according to FICO. That’s up from 41.4% in April 2020.However, there are disparities beneath the surface that underscore the K-shaped economy.For instance, FICO said the score distribution for 18-29 year olds has shifted toward both higher and lower scores “rather than clustering in the middle.”In other words, high credit scores today for young people are higher than in 2019 — but so are low ones.“There’s a lot of fragmentation among Gen Z. Many of them are thriving. Some are struggling and relying on support from parents. We’re definitely seeing a K-shaped economy,” said Tommy Lee, senior director at FICO.3.2 million borrowers are behind on student debtOne pressure facing younger Americans is the spike in housing costs driven by elevated mortgage rates and record-high home prices.The average monthly mortgage payment for a first-time homebuyer is 57% higher than in 2019, according to FICO.Another arguably bigger factor is the return of student debt payments and credit bureau reporting after a Covid-era pause.As of April, about 3.2 million Americans of all ages with a student loan payment due (or 14%) had a recent delinquency (30 days or more past due) reported in the prior six months, according to FICO.Those borrowers who fell behind on their student loans and were deemed delinquent saw their FICO score decline by an average of 38 points.By contrast, another 4.9 million borrowers either resolved a delinquency or moved into another repayment status, such as starting a repayment plan. Those consumers experienced an average credit score increase of 16 points, according to FICO.Schulz, the LendingTree expert, stressed that missed payments carry severe consequences that can haunt borrowers for many years — especially when they need to get a mortgage.“It really only takes one payment 30 days or more late to really do damage to your credit score,” he said.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story