Skip to main content

House passes bill that would ban members from buying stock

New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) in New York, US, on Tuesday, July 14, 2026. (Michael Nagle/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

(WASHINGTON) — The House on Wednesday passed a bill that would ban members of Congress from trading individual stocks as well as mandate that voters provide photo identification “as a condition of casting a ballot” by a 232-198 vote.

Thirteen Democrats voted with all Republicans in favor of the bill.

The Stop Insider Trading Act, championed by House Administration Committee Chairman Bryan Steil of Wisconsin, would prohibit members of Congress, their spouses and their dependent children from buying new stocks. The bill would, however, allow lawmakers to keep the stocks they already own.

“This is the first congressional stock trading ban to receive a vote on the floor of the House,” Steil said on the floor. “If you want to day trade, there is a place for that on Wall Street.”

Administration Committee ranking Democrat Joe Morelle of New York called the bill a “sham” because it “allows members of Congress to continue owning and trading stocks.”

Rep. Teresa Leger Fernandez of New Mexico, the chair of the Democratic Women’s Caucus, told ABC News that the bill wouldn’t prevent a member from selling stock they already hold.

“It doesn’t ban stock trading because you could still acquire stocks, sell stocks, use information that you have that you garner here in Congress to make a profit. And stock trading involves purchase and sales, and it does not prohibit sales,” she said.

Some Democrats opposed the bill in part because they contend it doesn’t go far enough to rein in stock trading for the executive branch, including the president and vice president.

“The biggest glaring absence is that the president and vice president can continue to stock trade,” Leger Fernandez said.

President Donald Trump’s recent financial disclosure report shows his investment advisers made more than 21,000 trades on his behalf last year, many involving companies with business before, or regulated by, his administration.

Republican Rep. Chip Roy of Texas also expressed regret that GOP leadership made the vote a “partisan exercise” by attaching voter ID to the ban and agreed with Democrats who argue the scope of legislation should address all three branches of government.

“It should apply to everybody. That was my preference, and always had been,” Roy said. “We stuck on focusing on Congress because you know, get your own house in order, and then you know you can kind of start pointing fingers elsewhere, but I would like it to apply to everybody in the executive branch, judiciary branch, and here.”

Other Democrats opposed the bill because it combined the stock ban bill with the voter ID provision as Trump continues to push Republicans in both chambers to pass the SAVE America Act, which Democrats oppose because they say it would disenfranchise some voters.

According to the bill text, that provision requires voters to show a valid physical photo identification when casting a ballot for federal office. Mail-in and absentee voters can attach a photocopy of their ID to their ballot. If an eligible voter forgets to bring their ID to vote, they can cast a provisional ballot.

“They’ve added provisions that have absolutely nothing to do with stock trading and everything to do with their obsession, their obsession with the 2020 election,” Morelle said of the voter ID provision.

Leger Fernandez said the bill amounted to a “Trojan Horse” for the Save America Act.

Rep. Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez of New York called it a “bait-and-switch” bill.

“They attached these voter suppression provisions specifically because they knew it would kill a stock trading ban. I proudly voted no because we are not going to sabotage mail-in voting in this country, and we’re not going to fall for, kind of, their bait-and-switch tactic here.”

Because of the voter ID language in the bill, the bill faces a rocky path in the Senate. Trump has pushed Republicans in the upper chamber to eliminate or modify the filibuster to pass his election legislation, though Majority Leader John Thune has repeatedly said Republicans don’t have the votes to do that.

Copyright © 2026, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

Darline Graham says she’s ‘not that informed on national security’ at debate

▶ Watch Video: Darline Graham and Ralph Norman head to runoff in South Carolina's Republican Senate primary Sen. Darline Graham fumbled a question on national security in the South Carolina GOP Senate debate, admitting she was "not that informed on national security" and neglecting to answer a question about Taiwan and the South China Sea.  The novice senator is beginning her sixth week on the job, having been appointed to fill her late brother Lindsey Graham's seat two days after his sudden death on July 11. Lack of experience is one of the primary criticisms facing her campaign. At Tuesday's debate, Rep. Ralph Norman, her GOP opponent who also advanced to the runoff behind Graham in the Aug. 11 primary, called her an "unknown candidate" while also representing mainstream Washington."I'm just going to be honest here," Graham answered when asked if Taiwan and the South China Sea are national security issues for the United States. "I'm not that informed on national security, so — but I do support the military."To the same question, Norman cited the importance of Taiwan's chip production and said, "what the president is doing right is he's enabling Taiwan to defend themselves against China."Graham later called China a national security threat, advocating for "any type of bans against China" from AI to farmland, and she also fielded questions on Iran and Israel. The candid revelation, however, has still drawn scrutiny. "Lindsey Graham was well informed on the United States' national security," former South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley wrote on X. "Darline Graham admits she's not. This is not something you inherit. And it's critical in the U.S. Senate."The Democratic nominee for the Senate seat also chimed in. "Darline Graham Nordone is asking for six years as South Carolina's senator — during wartime — yet has the gall to tell voters 'national security isn't my thing,'" Dr. Annie Andrews wrote. "South Carolina deserves better."Graham is backed by President Trump. While Lindsey Graham was focused on foreign policy and national security, having returned from a trip to Ukraine to visit President Volodymyr Zelenskyy a day before his death, his sister has vowed to focus on issues affecting South Carolinians. She told CBS News' Mark Strassmann last week that "affordability is a number one issue, definitely for me." Both candidates conveyed strong conservative beliefs and did not vastly differ in their policies. They pledged loyalty to Mr. Trump, agreed Iran was a threat, recognized Israel as an ally and advocated for the SAVE America Act and a ban on birthright citizenship.Graham ended the night on a fiery note, responding to Norman's criticism that she canceled a second debate. "I'd rather be out in South Carolina meeting the voters than here on this stage with you," Graham chirped back.She then touted her work in the Senate thus far, including helping pass the Russia Sanctions Bill, co-sponsoring the SAVE America Act and casting a key vote to confirm Attorney General Todd Blanche. "I've done more in 20 days than you have done in 20 years," Graham said. The runoff for the Republican nominee will be held on Aug. 25. 
Read Next Story