Skip to main content

House and Senate take different paths to avoid shutdown before midterms

Washington — Another deadline to fund the government is looming this fall in Congress, with members fresh off a series of shutdown fights that have left them eager to avoid another costly impasse ahead of the midterm elections.

But as lawmakers warn about the coming funding cliff, they have yet to agree on a path forward. Current funding expires at the end of the fiscal year on Oct. 1.

Last week, as the House appeared poised to move on a stopgap measure to keep the government funded, across the Capitol in the Senate, Majority Leader John Thune told CBS News that “we are in discussions on that,” noting that “we’re working on solutions to fund the government.” This week, the two chambers appeared to be on different pages. 

As the House prepared to vote on Tuesday on a measure to keep the government funded through the midterms, Thune announced that he intends to bring a separate continuing resolution to the floor before the August recess, citing “productive conversation on both sides of the aisle” on a funding measure.

Meanwhile, House Speaker Mike Johnson had been touting the lower chamber’s GOP-led plan. House Democratic leaders have pushed back against what they said was a premature effort that comes with time to negotiate a bipartisan agreement. 

The divergent strategies illustrated a key divide between the two chambers that has colored recent legislative fights. Both chambers have narrow Republican majorities. But the Senate must contend with a 60-vote threshold to advance most legislation, which requires support from Democrats, whereas the House can maneuver measures on a partisan basis. 

Thune outlined Wednesday that he’s asked Sen. Susan Collins of Maine, the chair of the Appropriations Committee, to draft a “bipartisan and clean continuing resolution” to fund the government until after the midterms, adding that he intends to bring up the measure for a vote before the chamber breaks for the August recess. The majority leader said the Appropriations Committee is “hard at work” reviewing proposed funding adjustments from the Trump administration to “ensure we have a bipartisan product ready to move quickly.”

Thune, a South Dakota Republican, has repeatedly spoken about the different dynamic in the Senate, and downplayed the two chambers’ differing approaches on Wednesday. 

“Everybody’s going the same direction,” Thune told CBS News. “It’s just, we have a slightly … different process. We need Democrats over here.”

The Senate was at the center of the 43-day shutdown last fall, when Democrats used funding the government as leverage to address expiring healthcare tax credits. Then, early this year, a partial government shutdown lasted more than 70 days when Democrats sought reforms to the administration’s immigration enforcement agencies. 

The funding fights have bled into this year’s appropriations process, which has been largely stalled in the Senate. Republicans have been predicting for months that Democrats will shut down the government this fall ahead of the midterm elections. 

“It was not a good year on the government funding front, with two record-breaking government shutdowns,” Thune said on the Senate floor Wednesday. “But we have an opportunity now to chart a new path.”

The majority leader said he’s “encouraged that so far my Democrat colleagues have signaled that they do not want to force another government shutdown.” He noted that he looks forward to bringing up a bipartisan continuing resolution in the coming days, while urging senators to support the legislation to “give the American people the certainty that they deserve.”

Collins said she’s “hopeful that we will be able to draft a bipartisan CR,” telling CBS News that Democrats have been amenable “so far.”

With the House set to leave Washington for its five-week August recess later this week, and the Senate intent on its own approach, the funding issue will all but certainly remain unresolved until lawmakers return in September. And adding to the process’ complications, its fate has become intertwined with another funding fight in recent days. 

The House has been pushing to approve additional funding for the Pentagon, along with a handful of other priorities, through the budget reconciliation process. That allows the party in power to approve measures with direct budgetary consequences without help from across the aisle. But Thune has been noncommittal about what would be a third reconciliation bill, and warned Tuesday that the Senate will “hold that” until they’re able to pass a continuing resolution to fund the government. 

If the bipartisan path forward fails, Thune indicated that the Senate could use that budget resolution as a vehicle to fund the government without the help of Democrats.

“I hope that’s not necessary,” Thune said. 

Trump declines to rule out declaring a national security emergency to control the 2026 election

(CNN) — President Donald Trump in a new interview declined to rule out declaring a national security emergency as a means to try to assert more control over the 2026 midterm elections.It’s merely the latest warning sign that Trump could try to mess with the election not just by baselessly claiming voter fraud and challenging the results afterward — as he did in 2020, leading to a violent riot at the US Capitol — but by trying to unilaterally take control before votes are cast.In the interview, Wayne Allyn Root of Real America’s Voice pitched such a scenario to Trump. He suggested it as an alternative, given the Senate has failed to pass Trump’s coveted elections bill, known as the “SAVE America Act.”“If they never get the SAVE America Act done, you have the right to declare a national security emergency for elections,” Root said. He added that “if you declare a national security emergency as the president of the United States, they can’t challenge it. It can only be overturned by a two-thirds vote by both houses of Congress. So if you do this in the next month, we will get photo ID, proof of citizenship (for voter registration) and a limit to mail-in ballots.”It’s at this point that Trump cut Root off and coyly suggested such an option was indeed in play.“Let me just say that stranger things have happened, OK?” Trump said. “I’ll leave it at that.”Despite Root’s comments, it’s far from clear such a gambit would even work. And CNN has asked the White House for more detail on what the president meant.Trump often responds to hypotheticals by declining to rule them out — no matter how extreme the proposal might be. So it’s possible to read too much into this.But as CNN’s Jake Tapper has noted, there are plenty of signals that Trump at least aspires to try to exert more control over elections. And these methods often appear transparently geared toward helping Republicans.A major one is the administration’s threat to have the US Postal Service not deliver mail ballots for states that don’t comply with its demand that they hand over their voter lists. This is a request that even many red states have rejected, citing privacy concerns.Democrats are much more likely to use mail ballots, which Trump has baselessly connected to widespread fraud. So curtailing them could greatly help Republicans.(Federal courts have blocked this Trump executive order, and the administration recently appealed to the Supreme Court.)Trump has also gone to great lengths to try to substantiate his still-baseless claims of widespread fraud. That includes the administration seizing 2020 ballots in Fulton County, Georgia, and Trump’s recent primetime address about election security that some read as a statement of intent — a pretext for more direct federal involvement in elections, which are run by states.Ty Cobb, who served as White House counsel in Trump’s first term, said he interpreted the speech last month as a “predicate that he needs to declare an emergency.”And Trump has occasionally said things, like he did in the new interview, suggesting he would like to take control of US elections.Back in February, he urged his party to “take over the voting in at least 15 places,” adding: “The Republicans ought to nationalize the voting.”The Washington Post also reported in March that pro-Trump activists were circulating a potential executive order that claimed Chinese interference in the 2020 election gave Trump emergency authorities over the 2026 election. And Trump’s primetime address focused on China, despite the tenuous evidence.Trump’s intense focus on the “SAVE America Act,” which has never appeared to have a chance to pass but Trump has said is vital, could also be read as part of building the case for more drastic action.But whether Trump could take over elections himself, as Root posits, is far from certain.As CNN’s Marshall Cohen and Michael Williams reported in February, the Constitution makes it difficult for Trump to truly “nationalize” elections. Courts have overwhelmingly upheld the principle that states are in charge of elections.Presidents generally have more authority to act unilaterally when national security is involved — hence the significance of invoking China — but some experts are skeptical that Trump’s effort would pass legal muster.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story