Skip to main content

Federal prosecutors are under fire after critics accuse them of smearing man killed by ICE in Houston

(CNN) — An FBI agent arrived at a crime scene and saw something suspicious: tied plastic baggies containing unknown substances resembling illegal drugs.

He would need to laboratory test the items to be sure. To do that, he would also get a warrant.

The Houston incident, following one of the latest deadly shootings by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers, mirrors countless routine police encounters that happen daily across the country as officers find suspected drug paraphernalia and seek court orders to seize and test it for illegal substances.

In this instance, however, the search warrant, shielded from public view when initially filed, was inexplicably unsealed and made public the next day. Justice Department veterans told CNN they can’t remember a time when information that could be critical to a case was made publicly available while a criminal investigation was still underway.

“This is absolutely abnormal,” said Elie Honig, CNN senior legal analyst and former federal prosecutor. “This raises all sorts of red flags and all sorts of questions about why they would unseal this now.”

The move quickly set off a firestorm, with immigration rights advocates accusing DOJ of trying to malign a dead man. And some legal experts are now questioning whether the department is playing politics in an unprecedented way with a high-profile criminal investigation.

‘It just smells of a smear campaign,’ an advocate says

The still-unidentified substances were allegedly found on the dashboard and floor of a van driven by Lorenzo Salgado Araujo, a Houston man ICE tried to pull over last week on suspicion of being in the country unlawfully. Importantly, he was not their original target. Instead, federal authorities said immigration officers were initially searching for undocumented migrants in another vehicle that resembled Salgado Araujo’s van when they initiated the traffic stop.

In a statement, which mirrors similar past statements issued by the Department of Homeland of Security during the Trump’s administration’s nationwide immigration enforcement surge, ICE said Salgado Araujo “rammed an ICE law enforcement vehicle, refused to follow multiple verbal commands, and weaponized his vehicle in an attempt to run over an ICE law enforcement officer” before an immigration officer shot and killed him in self-defense.

No video has surfaced depicting the moment of the shooting and none of the officers were wearing body cameras. Men who were riding in the van with Salgado Araujo and his brother, Victor, told attorney Hugo Balderas-Ibarra they did not attempt to ram officers, nor put the officers in danger.

Salgado Araujo also had no prior criminal record despite the Trump administration’s claims it is targeting the ‘worst of the worst.’

In an affidavit seeking to search the vehicle filed in federal court Tuesday, the FBI agent who responded to the incident wrote “the white in color crystal-like substances packaged in small clear plastic bags are consistent with how users of drugs package controlled substances for distribution, manufacturing, and possession,” adding it was “consistent with methamphetamine.”

As is normal in active, high-profile investigations, the federal court docket shows the search warrant was originally filed by DOJ under seal, shielding its contents from public view.

But, a day later, in a move many who served in law enforcement viewed as baffling, the warrant appeared to have been suddenly unsealed while the ongoing investigation into the incident was still underway. It was quickly picked up by the media, with articles and TV segments spotlighting the FBI’s suspicion that Salgado Araujo was transporting methamphetamine.

The US Attorneys Office for the Southern District of Texas did not respond to multiple requests for comment on the allegations in the warrant; why the warrant information was made public; and whether it was unsealed at the request of federal prosecutors.

Notably, attorney Ruby Powers representing Salgado Araujo’s family refuted the notion he was in possession of drugs, saying in a statement the family believed the plastic baggies actually contained “granulated salt, which is paired with lemon and water as a homemade electrolyte mix used by outdoor workers in extreme Texas heat, not methamphetamine or any other illicit substance.”

Harris County District Attorney Sean Teare, who has criticized federal authorities for not cooperating with his office’s investigation into the shooting, told CNN he also does not believe the substance the FBI found was drugs. The FBI has not commented on whether testing of the items has been completed.

In addition to criticizing the unsealing of the search warrant in the case, Teare told CNN’s Erin Burnett on Friday that he did not believe the FBI fully processed the van for evidence. That might include records from the vehicle’s computer system indicating its speed, steering, and braking, he said, as well as swabbing the exterior for DNA that may prove immigration officers were in physical contact with the van.

“All they were looking for were baggies that were in open sight, and the only thing that I can think they did it for was to smear a good man’s name,” he said.

The president of the LULAC Adelante PAC, a political group that supports Latino voter participation and candidates, accused federal investigators of trying to “change the public discourse and prejudice a jury in Harris County.”

“It just smells of a smear campaign and a cover up,” Domingo Garcia said Wednesday.

‘No reason to unseal it now,’ says DOJ veteran

“No prosecutor would ever unseal a warrant at this phase of an investigation under any ordinary circumstances,” said Honig, who served in the US Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York.

He said warrants are typically only unsealed after a case has been indicted by a federal grand jury and federal prosecutors begin sharing evidence with the defense as required.

“There is no reason to unseal it now,” Honig said. “All you do is risk revealing information about your investigation you don’t want revealed. You could compromise your investigation, compromise witnesses, and undermine your own case.”

If the unusual step to unseal the search warrant was indeed meant to sully the reputation of Salgado Araujo and his passengers, it may have worked. Social media was ablaze with demeaning comments. Some, however, directed their skepticism and hostility towards ICE and the FBI, openly questioning why they would think someone would actually drive around with methamphetamine clearly visible on their dashboard.

One notable aspect of this apparent subplot is how little the presence of drugs, if eventually verified by FBI testing, would likely factor at all into the DHS Office of Inspector General’s ongoing investigation of the ICE officer’s decision to use deadly force. To date, DHS has not indicated the ICE officers who stopped Salgado Araujo had any knowledge of drugs possibly being inside the vehicle at the time of the fatal shooting.

It does remain to be seen whether any allegations of drug possession may be used in possible deportation proceedings for the passengers who were riding with him. The DA in Houston has requested they be afforded special visas while multiple investigations remain underway, calling the men witnesses to alleged crimes.

In a statement Thursday that did not address any of the questions raised about the unsealing of the search warrant in the case, Trump-appointed US Attorney Aaron Reitz, who took office this month after previously working for Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) and in Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton’s office, insisted he is not “drawing any final conclusions while the investigation is ongoing.”

Reitz said federal authorities “are doing everything we can to seek the truth and do the right thing. In the meantime, I encourage the public to give the FBI and DHS the opportunity to investigate.”

The-CNN-Wire
™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.

Who is Elon Musk calling a ‘traitor’?

(CNN) — Elon Musk recently sat for a wide-ranging interview with The Economist editor-in-chief Zanny Minton Beddoes, who challenged him over his support for Europe’s far right, his anti-Muslim rhetoric and his cuts to humanitarian aid during his stint in the Trump administration.Afterwards, on his own social media network that he routinely uses to amplify his personal views, Musk lashed out against his interviewer. “She is a traitor to the West, plain and simple,” he wrote.By Musk’s assessment, society is full of “traitors.” As he declared over the weekend, “anyone who opposes remigration is a traitor.” So is “anyone who doesn’t love America.” He has also leveled the charge at Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, Arizona Sen. Mark Kelly, Minnesota Rep. Ilhan Omar and Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, to name a few. CNN has reached out to Musk for comment.“Traitor” — which derives via Old French from the Latin “trādēre,” meaning to hand over — was first recorded in English in the early 13th century to describe a person who violated another’s trust or a duty entrusted to them. By the end of the century, it also encompassed betrayals of one’s sovereign or government. Being a traitor is a mark of infamy that carries down through history, attached to the likes of Marcus Junius Brutus, who conspired to assassinate Julius Caesar; Judas Iscariot, who betrayed Jesus for 30 pieces of silver; Benedict Arnold, who deceived George Washington and the Continental Army; and Vidkun Quisling, a Norwegian military officer who collaborated with Nazi Germany during World War II.In the legal sense, a “traitor” is someone found guilty of the crime of treason, which also derives from the Latin “trādēre” and seems to have entered English around the same time as “traitor.”Article III of the US Constitution stipulates that “Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.” This narrow definition was a deliberate attempt by the Founding Fathers to shape political culture, said Thomas Main, author of “The Rise of Illiberalism” and a professor at Baruch College.In “Federalist No. 43,” James Madison warned against “new-fangled and artificial treasons” invented by political factions to use against one another whenever power changes hands. “[T]he convention have, with great judgment, opposed a barrier to this peculiar danger, by inserting a constitutional definition of the crime,” he wrote.“It’s because he doesn’t want newfangled definitions of treason to be used as weapons in everyday debate between political factions,” Main said. “The result of that is a political culture that is intolerant, which is not consistent with liberal democracy.”Despite the founders’ efforts, the words “traitor,” and its relative “treason,” have been invoked throughout US history in more expansive ways. What sort of betrayals might spark such accusations? Often, the allegiances in question seemed to be drawn along lines of race.The mid-20th century saw the rise of the phrase “race traitor,” applied by segregationists and the Ku Klux Klan to white people who aligned themselves with the Civil Rights Movement. Catherine Fosl, a historian and author of the biography “Subversive Southerner” of white civil rights activist Anne Braden, said that when Braden and her husband bought a house on behalf of a Black family in 1954, the phrase appeared frequently in the hate mail they received.“It’s often paired with charges of socialism, communism, outsider,” she said in an interview. “It connotes ‘They’re not like us. They’re not part of us, and they want to undermine our way of life.’”Fosl, who has also taught South African history, said the word “traitor” was similarly applied to dissenters against apartheid in Musk’s native country, South Africa. The government there charged Nelson Mandela and more than 150 other anti-apartheid activists with treason in a multi-year mass trial that ended in acquittal in 1961.By the ’90s, the idea of the “race traitor” was so ingrained in US political discourse that it was reclaimed by some activists on the left. In 1993, the steelworker-turned-scholar Noel Ignatiev and the cab driver-turned-educator John Garvey began publishing the journal “Race Traitor” — eagerly embracing the once-derogatory label. “It wasn’t exactly an everyday phrase,” Garvey said, “But it was just below the surface of what people thought when so-called whites made common cause with especially Black folks.”Garvey said the journal, which published quarterly from 1993 to 2005, was premised on the idea of abolishing whiteness as a social category that situates white people above other racial groups. Under the motto “treason to whiteness is loyalty to humanity,” he said that he and his co-editor Ignatiev hoped to inspire a mass movement of “race traitors” that would eventually transform the country.Garvey and Ignatiev’s vision didn’t exactly come to pass. And political shifts that were set in motion decades earlier would eventually lay the foundation for the right’s use of “traitor” today. With the rise of modern conservatism in the ’70s and ’80s, Main said influential figures on the right began to approach politics as war. The right-wing FrontPage magazine, edited by former leftist-turned-conservative activist David Horowitz, frequently referred to everyday Democrats and liberals as “traitors,” as Main noted in a 2020 analysis. Ann Coulter’s 2003 book “Treason: Liberal Treachery from the Cold War to the War on Terrorism” similarly promoted the idea that liberal political views amounted to crimes against the US.“If you then say, ‘Well, all politics is war,’ that means everybody who doesn’t agree with me politically is a traitor,” Main said.This is the framing that Musk — and much of the US political right — seems to have adopted today. President Donald Trump deploys the epithet “traitor” at anyone he perceives to be as disloyal, as he did with former GOP Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene when she broke with him over the release of the Jeffrey Epstein files. MAGA influencers, including New Jersey political strategist Mike Crispi, accused Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett of betraying Republicans for voting to uphold states’ post-election grace periods for mail-in ballots. “Amy Coney Barrett is quite literally a traitor to our country,” he wrote on X. “Up until a few years ago, elections were ALWAYS finalized on Election NIGHT. We all know why the Democrats changed this process. So why did Barrett just vote to uphold it?”The decades-old “race traitor” has seen a resurgence, too. After Renee Good and Alex Pretti were killed by federal agents while demonstrating against the Trump administration’s deportation campaign, the white supremacist influencer Nick Fuentes called them “race traitors.” Fuentes has also referred to Vice President JD Vance as a “race traitor” for marrying a woman of Indian heritage.When Musk calls someone a “traitor,” he seems to regard the word as the utmost insult. His contempt for so-called “traitors” is so great that in recent weeks, he’s repeatedly posted or reposted versions of the far-right meme “first the traitors, then the invaders.” The slogan refers to the idea among anti-immigrant extremists that before targeting immigrants themselves, they need to attack people who support immigration; Musk reposted a user who applied the message to the new Uwe Boll movie, “Citizen Vigilante,” to explain why the protagonist, played by Armie Hammer, “spends the first half of the movie murdering white people not migrants.”In white supremacist circles, the idea goes back to a key plot point in the 1978 racist novel “The Turner Diaries,” which depicts a group of white people who hunt down and execute “race traitors,” before going on to wipe all non-white people from the face of the earth. The book — with its treatment of racial integration as equivalent to the death-penalty federal crime of treason — has inspired numerous acts of racist violence through the years since its publication.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story