Skip to main content

Ex-commander convicted over submarine implosion that killed 44

▶ Watch Video: Argentina may have received signals from missing sub

An Argentine court convicted a senior former naval officer on Wednesday over the 2017 implosion of a submarine in the South Atlantic in which all 44 crew members died.

The wreck of the ARA San Juan was the Argentine navy’s deadliest disaster in peacetime.

Claudio Villamide, commander of the submarine force at the time of the tragedy, was given a three-year suspended sentence for aggravated negligence and breach of duties.

The federal court in the southern province of Santa Cruz also barred him from holding public office for six years.

Three other former naval chiefs were acquitted.

ARGENTINA-SUBMARINE-ACCIDENT-JUSTICE-SENTENCE
Former Navy commander Claudio Javier Villamide, former chief of the Submarine Force Command, arrives alongside his lawyer Magali Crespos for the sentencing hearing in the trial over the 2017 sinking of the ARA San Juan submarine in Rio Gallegos, Santa Cruz province, Argentina, on July 8, 2026. 

Walter Diaz /AFP via Getty Images

The San Juan went missing on Nov. 15, 2017, a week after it set off from Ushuaia on Argentina’s southern tip for its home port at Mar del Plata naval base.

Before vanishing, it reported seawater had entered the ventilation system, causing a battery on the vessel to short-circuit and start a fire.

It sank and then imploded.

More than a dozen countries took part in a weekslong search for the vessel, but it was eventually located a year later by a British marine robotics firm at a depth of around 3,000 feet, its hull dented and deformed. At the time, the Argentine navy released an image of the wreckage, showing “the habitable section containing the batteries and all the submarine’s systems and equipment.”

argentina-san-juan-submarine.jpg
A tweet from the Argentine Navy shows, at right, the torpedo tubes from the front of the ARA San Juan submarine, discovered almost 3,000 feet deep on the Atlantic seafloor by Ocean Infinity, and at left a diagram showing where the tubes would have been locted on the intact sub.

Navy of Argentina

The discovery was announced just two days after families of the missing sailors held a commemoration one year after the sub disappeared.

“These were 44 preventable deaths”  

The disaster, which inspired a 2024 Netflix documentary, traumatized Argentines and led to questions about whether the navy had fulfilled its duty of care toward the 43 men and one woman aboard.

Prosecutors told the trial that the ship was in a poor state of repair before setting sail and its demise was “foreseeable.”

An attorney representing most of the victims’ families rejected the ruling as “insufficient” and announced plans to appeal.

“The families will appeal the acquittals and demand harsher sentences,” Valeria Carreras told AFP.

She nonetheless hailed the case as a “huge step” toward achieving accountability for the sailors’ deaths and expressed satisfaction the court had returned a guilty finding against Villamide.

“These were 44 preventable deaths, and it sends a message to the Armed Forces and the State to protect those who serve the nation,” she said.

Victoria Morales, whose 31-year-old son Esteban Garcia died in the implosion, said those responsible have been “left unpunished.”

“Once again they stab us, they trample on his name, they leave us in a bad way, they left us without a member of our family. … How could I be satisfied?” Morales told AFP from the northern province of Tucuman.

Prosecutors argued Villamide failed to take into account the submarine’s “deficient enlistment conditions” as well as a request for it to undergo safety inspections.

He denied any wrongdoing and insisted the vessel was seaworthy.

The wreck still lies on the seabed, 310 miles off the coast of Santa Cruz province. Hours after announcing the sub’s discovery, the Argentine government said it was unable to recover the vessel, drawing anger from missing sailors’ relatives.

‘Decades in Sports’: How the 1980s Miami Hurricanes became one of the most hated teams in sports history

(CNN) — Editor’s note: Watch CNN Original Series “Decades in Sports” on the CNN app. Across six episodes, the series explores the defining moments, athletes and cultural shifts that shaped sports over the past six decades, from the television revolution and Civil Rights Movement of the 1960s, right up to the impact of social media on today’s biggest stars.There have been plenty of dominant teams in the 150-plus-year history of college football, but few have left a bigger mark on the sport than the Miami Hurricanes did during the 1980s.The Canes were a team that went against the grain, trash-talking in a way that constantly got under their opponents’ skin, celebrating wildly after big plays and dancing in the end zone after touchdowns with a swagger that stood out as much as their bright orange jerseys.“That made them such a phenomenon,” says John U. Bacon, author of Fourth and Long: The Fight for the Soul of College Football, as the Hurricanes’ bold, brash and arrogant style transformed college football into something closer to theater.As Bacon also highlights in the series, “The Hurricanes were the bad boys of college football.” However, their impact was felt far beyond the gridiron, as the 1986 squad was even labeled the most hated team of all time by Sports Illustrated.For context, the 25-team list devised by Sports Illustrated featured some of the most polarizing teams in US sports history, such as the 1988-89 Detroit Pistons (widely known as the “Bad Boys”), the 2010-11 Miami Heat (universally recognized as the team that kickstarted the “superteam” era in the NBA) and the 2007 New England Patriots (who became the ultimate villains of the NFL after the infamous “Spygate” scandal.But it was this college football program which topped them all. As Bacon says, “They were more popular in Miami than the Dolphins, and the Dolphins had (1984 NFL MVP) Dan Marino.”Why Miami was so hatedThe Canes’ boisterous antics were not just empty calories – they backed it up when they stepped onto the field.Like many polarizing sports teams throughout history, Miami garnered attention because it won. Winning made the Hurricanes easy to root against, but also impossible to ignore.However, what truly set them apart is how they embraced the role of the villain.Before facing defending national champion and top-ranked Oklahoma in September 1986 in front of over 70,000 fans at the Orange Bowl, the Hurricanes famously defied protocol and refused to shake hands with the Sooners, sparking a heated exchange between the top two teams right in front of the TV cameras.Game officials intervened and even threatened to throw a penalty flag if Miami snubbed the pre-game handshake. But the Hurricanes didn’t budge and backed up their pre-game antics by beating the Sooners 28-16.Their “style ruffled a lot of feathers,” says Dr. Todd Boyd, Professor of Cinema and Music Studies at USC. But the more people disliked Miami, the more the team seemed to embrace it.Later that same season, they took it a step further.When landing in Tempe, Arizona, for the 1987 Fiesta Bowl against Penn State, which served as the national championship game, the Hurricanes famously stepped off their plane wearing full camouflage military fatigues in an attempt to intimidate the Nittany Lions.It didn’t work on that occasion, as Miami fell 14-10 in the title game. But the following year, the “Bad Boy” Hurricanes came out on top, going unbeaten and taking down the Oklahoma Sooners – again – 20-14 to win the national championship.As Van Lathan – journalist and podcaster at The Ringer – says in the series, “The 80s were an anti-hero decade.”Lathan went on to highlight that, during that time, “We are re-examining what is OK in the name of coming out on top. This is a post-Watergate America … and whatever it takes, we are going to win.”No one embodied that shift more than this group from South Florida: It was win by any means necessary.As sports journalist and podcaster Bomani Jones highlights: “It became the dominant culture of the sport.”However, none of this would have been possible without a coach who not only allowed his players the space to go about their business in such a controversial manner, but one who encouraged the brash and boisterous behavior they took to stadiums across the country: Jimmy Johnson.The Jimmy Johnson effectWhen Johnson arrived in South Florida in 1984, he had pretty big shoes to fill.Howard Schnellenberger – who helped build Miami’s college football program into one of the elite programs over five seasons – had just departed after leading the Hurricanes to their first national championship, upsetting the unbeaten, top-ranked Nebraska Cornhuskers 31-30 at the Orange Bowl.However, despite Schnellenberger being the original architect of Miami’s success, it was under Johnson that the Hurricanes truly peaked.After going 18-7 in his first two seasons, Miami went 34-2 in his final three, winning the national championship in 1987 and narrowly losing one 14-10 to Penn State in 1986 after Johnson led the Hurricanes to the first undefeated regular season in program history.But it was the culture Johnson cultivated in South Florida that made his tenure so memorable.There was a shift happening in sports in the 1980s, with players becoming more brash and expressive. It is something that is celebrated today but was highly frowned upon at the time.Johnson’s genius was not only in recognizing that shift, but also in allowing his players to be their authentic selves out on the field, because as Jones highlights in the series: “The Florida boys are different, (and) they have a really good time when they play their football.“Normally, when you get a lot of players who like to dance when they score a touchdown and like to talk a bunch of sh*t when they play, you have a coach who is trying to tamp that down and get them to behave a little bit more respectably…“Jimmy Johnson loved it! He loved it as much as they did. He’s like, ‘As long as we win, you can do whatever you want.’”On its face, it sounds simple, but it was highly effective and it was an era that redefined what a college football powerhouse could look like. They were rough around the edges, bold, brash and arrogant – but that’s what made them who they were.Better to be remembered for something than not remembered at all. And no one will forget the 1980s Miami Hurricanes, the “Bad Boys of college football.”The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story