Skip to main content

Everything you need to know about England vs. Argentina

(CNN) — Note: This story first appeared in The Beautiful Game by CNN Sports, our daily newsletter on all things World Cup. To subscribe, click here.

Spain defied all pre-match predictions when it comprehensively brushed France aside to reach the World Cup final yesterday, and now it holds the enviable position of sitting back and seeing who it will play at MetLife Stadium on Sunday.

And while yesterday’s semifinal finished with a whimper, you can’t imagine that will be the case when Argentina comes face-to-face with England later today. The two nations have a long history both on and off the pitch, and all that should fuel what’s likely to be a fiery semifinal.

There is just so much to talk about with this game, so let’s dive straight in, starting with Argentina’s magic man who is stepping into new territory.

The Main Thing: Can England stop Lionel Messi in its first meeting?

In all of his 205 games for Argentina, it’s quite incredible that Lionel Messi has never faced England before. And while the superstar is slightly past his prime, he’ll be the one the Three Lions will attempt to tame later today.

Messi’s tournament has just been incredible. The fact he’s scored eight goals at the age of 39 is one thing, but his role in dragging Argentina out of trouble is arguably more impressive. Whenever the Albiceleste needs him, it appears that Messi can still deliver with a goal, an assist or a bit of magic that unlocks a defense.

He has had to adapt his game, of course. No player approaching 40 can press or attack with the same intensity throughout the whole match. Instead, the forward now picks his moments, strolling around the pitch to find space and then exploding into action.

According to Opta, Messi is the only player in this World Cup to cover 5km while walking during a match – in fact, he’s done it twice.

But if England mistakes his walking for laziness, then it’s in for a real shock in Atlanta. By constantly strolling around, Messi is not only conserving energy, but he’s also trying to find the best position in which to operate. If the English defenders switch off for just a second, they will be punished.

After all, no player has had more attempts on goal during this tournament than Messi (33) and he’s also had the most attempts from outside the penalty area (17).

Now that France and Kylian Mbappé are out of the tournament, Messi is surely favorite for the Golden Boot. He’s currently level with the French striker but has one, if not two, matches to overtake him.

But for those just getting into soccer now, I really wish you could have seen Messi at his peak (I guess you still can with the power of YouTube). Yes, he’s brilliant now, but he was a different beast 10 years ago. That World Cup win in 2022 just underlined, to me at least, that he’s the greatest to ever play the game.

He’s obviously already a national hero and the way in which his teammates look to protect and supply him with chances could well lead Argentina to back-to-back World Cup finals.

But as for Messi, he’s keeping his feet firmly on the ground and looking forward to a fresh challenge in his otherwise record-breaking career.

“It’s special because they’re a great team, a powerhouse, and it’s always nice to play a team like that, a match of this kind,” Messi told reporters about the prospect of playing England for the first time.

Inside look at the Three Lions

As for England, a nation awaits with bated breath. I can’t put into words how much soccer means to the nation. It can only really be described by the faces of anguish and pure joy on the face of English supporters who have watched every second of their team’s campaign this summer – often packing pubs in the earlier hours for the chance to celebrate together.

In truth, England is used to heartbreak. It’s lost two major finals in recent years and, despite the front of confidence, many fans find it hard to believe that this, after 60 years of pain, could be the World Cup the Three Lions eventually win again.

Watching this tournament as an England fan has been particularly hard (yet ultimately rewarding).

Despite all the world class attacking talent in the squad, the Three Lions have often relied on their defensive structure to get them through the knockout stages. The pattern seems set: Snatch the lead through a moment of brilliance from either Harry Kane or Jude Bellingham and then defend for their lives.

And while winning ugly is fine for most, England manager Thomas Tuchel is demanding better performances from his team, especially because it’s about to come up against an Argentina side which has scored the most goals in the tournament (17) and will have Messi leading the charge.

“He can explode in every minute. He’s a silent killer. He can also kill you while he’s walking. You can never fall asleep. You can never underestimate the burst of energy,” Tuchel said of Messi to ITV Sports.

“We have to find a way to stop it and to overcome it. We are not here to congratulate him. We are not here to build him a throne. We’re here to take the game away from him.”

That’s easier said than done, of course.

Inside look at the Albiceleste

As for Argentina, it’s been here and done this before. Most of the current squad was part of the title-winning team in 2022 and that experience will serve them well.

A bit like England, though, the defending champion has not exactly clicked in North America in terms of performances. Instead, it’s relied on moments of magic and stunning comebacks to sneak into the last four.

In every knockout game this summer, it looked as though Argentina could be heading out. First, it was taken to extra-time by Cape Verde in arguably the match of the tournament. Then it was 11 minutes from elimination against Egypt before launching a miracle comeback from 2-0 down.

And finally, its quarterfinal against Switzerland turned on its head after a dubious decision left its opponent with 10-men at a time where the South Americans were struggling.

It’s true that there is an unfounded narrative that officials have been helping Argentina and Messi at this tournament, with the team landing on the right side of some controversial decisions. But against a team with as much quality as England, Argentina won’t be able to rely on any luck.

“We’re facing great players, two of the best in the world,” Argentina manager Lionel Scaloni said. “We will try our best to neutralize them. We have our weapons and we will try to prevent them from having a good game.”

Whatever happens, you can expect fireworks in Atlanta. I’ll be watching while cowered behind my sofa, I expect.

Quote of the Day

The words of France’s departing manager Didier Deschamps after that bruising defeat to Spain in yesterday’s semifinal.

Deschamps has led the national team to one of its most successful eras, winning the 2018 World Cup and then finishing runner-up in the 2022 edition.

Many had thought the 57-year-old could guide Les Bleus to the title again in what was always going to be his last summer in charge of the team.

But, in the end, they fell just short and that clearly hit Deschamps hard despite all his previous success.

Spain fans cuckoo for Cucurella after La Roja’s World Cup win over France

On the other side of the coin, CNN Sports’ Don Riddell was busy talking to ecstatic Spanish fans celebrating the win.

Some he spoke to were more memorable than others… just take a look at this video of four supporters dressed as Spain defender Marc Cucurella.

A rivalry for the ages

By CNN’s Glen Levy

Watching England vs. Argentina on a soccer field has proved to be a rare thing over the years and yet the rivalry runs deeper than many imagine.

Some of that stems from the political relations between the two nations off the pitch, but much bad blood has also been developed by a string of controversial matches on it.

In the 1960s, England got the better of its Argentine opponent in consecutive World Cup tournaments, with a 1-0 victory in 1966 helping the English to eventually lift the trophy for the only time in their history. Albiceleste captain Antonio Rattín was sent off, the team thought England’s goal was offside, and then Three Lions boss Alf Ramsey later used some strong language about the Argentines, which did not endear him to the press or public.

Fast forward 20 years to 1986, and the epic quarterfinal clash at the Estadio Azteca in Mexico was played against the backdrop of the Falklands War, which had been fought between the two countries four years previously. But the game will be remembered more for what happened during it.

An inspired Diego Maradona took matters literally into his own hands in the second half, scoring the infamous “Hand of God” goal, before a sumptuous second just minutes later, which would be known as the “Goal of the Century.”

In the late 1990s, a pulsating knockout clash in the Round of 16 saw the teams share four first half goals at France 1998, including a wondergoal from a teenage Michael Owen, before his teammate David Beckham rather naively got himself sent off and England’s 10 men eventually succumbed on penalty kicks. Beckham would get a measure of revenge at the next World Cup in 2002, by scoring a penalty in regular time for a 1-0 group stage victory.

And now to a World Cup semifinal in Atlanta.

Neither side has played to the best of their abilities thus far, but both powerhouses have been smart and savvy enough to get the job done. It’s the first matchup since a pulsating 2005 friendly ended 3-2 to England, in Geneva, Switzerland.

Expect the unexpected.

The Final Whistle: Atlanta to boost security measures around the match

Given the fierce rivalry between both teams, the Atlanta Police Department (APD) said it would be boosting its security measures around the city today.

“Additional personnel and resources are already deployed and will continue to be strategically assigned … to help ensure a safe and enjoyable experience for everyone,” APD said in a statement.

It added: “Adjustments are a routine part of managing an event of this magnitude and are intended to ensure a safe and enjoyable FIFA World Cup experience.”

There has yet to be any notable fan trouble at this World Cup – an issue that blighted several editions of the tournament in the past. But there are clearly fears that could change given the political and sporting history between Argentina and England. Although, hopefully, these concerns will prove unfounded.

England fans were once closely associated with hooliganism on the international stage, especially during the 1980s and 1990s. But the fanbase has been far better behaved in recent tournaments.

“We’ve continued to show that the outdated stereotypes don’t define us, and everywhere we’ve gone, the focus has been on the passion, humor and backing you’ve given the team,” the Football Supporters’ Association said in a statement.

“Let’s make sure we continue to look after one another, represent England with pride, and give everyone another reminder of why we have the best fans in the world.”

According to Reuters, Argentina’s security minister Alejandra Monteoliva said today’s match would be the first time at this World Cup where both sets of fans will be channeled through separate entrances into the stadium.

Fingers crossed the drama remains on the pitch.

The-CNN-Wire
™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.

Por qué el cambiazo secreto de Air Force One de Trump es problemático

A primera vista, la noticia de que el presidente Donald Trump cambió de avión en secreto antes de salir de Turquía el mes pasado debido a una amenaza de seguridad proveniente de Irán podría parecer no controvertida, e incluso algo genial, en un sentido de capa y espada.Pero la historia — que fue revelada por The Washington Post a última hora del lunes y más tarde confirmada por CNN y otros — sí plantea algunos problemas y preguntas muy reales.Primero, repasemos lo básico de lo informado.Ya se había informado el mes pasado que, debido a preocupaciones de seguridad, la Casa Blanca había descartado un vuelo de regreso en el nuevo avión regalado por Catar que Trump usa como Air Force One, en favor del avión más antiguo. (Trump había afirmado inicialmente que era para que miembros del servicio estadounidense pudieran recorrer el nuevo avión). El avión antiguo tiene mejores características de seguridad que el avión nuevo reacondicionado. Y dado que Turquía limita con Irán, esa precaución tendría sentido.Ahora está claro que Trump abordó el avión antiguo y luego fue trasladado en secreto, mediante un camión de catering, a un Air Force C-32A más pequeño. Voló en ese al Reino Unido, donde mantuvo la farsa al volver a abordar de forma encubierta el viejo Air Force One, desembarcar para las cámaras y luego subirse al avión regalado por Catar para el vuelo de regreso a casa.Eso plantea el primer problema.Es legítimo — y no es algo inaudito — que se tomen este tipo de medidas para proteger a un presidente. Pero es notable que Trump y la Casa Blanca siguieran mintiendo al respecto incluso después de que el aparente peligro hubiera pasado.El entonces presidente Bill Clinton usó un avión señuelo para un viaje a Pakistán en 2000, llegando en un C-20 sin marcas después de que un C-20 con una imagen estadounidense más conspicua hubiera aterrizado. (Funcionarios estadounidenses temían que el avión de Clinton pudiera ser derribado por terroristas como Osama bin Laden).Pero Clinton pronto se bajó del avión sin marcas, revelando efectivamente la artimaña al público. Y The Washington Post informó el martes que la Casa Blanca de Clinton informó al jefe de la Asociación de Corresponsales de la Casa Blanca, extraoficialmente, con antelación.En contraste, Trump y la Casa Blanca siguieron fingiendo que en realidad había volado en el Air Force One antiguo.Durante un encuentro informal con la prensa en el tramo posterior desde el Reino Unido de regreso a Estados Unidos (cuando Trump estaba en el avión nuevo), el presidente habló en términos generales sobre la posibilidad de que el avión pudiera haber enfrentado preocupaciones de seguridad. Pero negó rotundamente que hubiera una específica.“¿Está diciendo que no había una preocupación de seguridad?”, preguntó un reportero.“No. No. ¿Por qué la habría?”, respondió Trump.Preguntado si había “algún otro problema”, dijo: “No”.Cuando los reporteros siguieron insistiendo sobre si había una amenaza específica, Trump desvió repetidamente.“Bueno, tengo una amenaza todo el tiempo”, dijo Trump. “Soy el número uno en su lista antes que ustedes. Pero si yo me voy, ustedes se van”.Un asesor demócrata de seguridad nacional dijo el martes que el Gang of Eight, un grupo de líderes del Congreso, no fue informado sobre el episodio, pero señaló que los movimientos presidenciales no son algo en cuya gestión el Congreso se involucre profundamente. Pero, añadió el asesor, “el Congreso debería haber sido informado sobre la amenaza, si no sobre el episodio”.Un asesor republicano de un miembro del Gang of Eight dijo que no podía comentar sobre las acciones del grupo.Y eso nos lleva a otra parte delicada de esto. Si bien es comprensible tomar medidas extensas para proteger al presidente, este plan dejó a muchas personas — incluidos reporteros y miembros del personal de la administración — en el Air Force One antiguo como señuelos involuntarios y sin saberlo, muy en la línea de fuego.Las preguntas a partir de ahí son: ¿Había alguna alternativa a eso, como permitir que todos los demás salieran en otros aviones? ¿Por qué no se informó a los reporteros? (A veces esa información puede compartirse bajo embargo, en cuyo caso los reporteros tienen la información pero no pueden publicarla. Por supuesto, la administración Trump no confía en la prensa). Y, por último, ¿qué precauciones se tomaron para proteger el avión legado?“Ahora va a haber preguntas con respecto a qué seguridad se proporcionó para cada uno de los otros dos 747, donde la gente seguía volando en ese avión representando a la prensa de Estados Unidos, al personal de la Casa Blanca”, dijo en CNN el exagente del Servicio Secreto Robert McDonald en “The Story Is with Elex Michaelson”.El secretario de Estado Marco Rubio el martes ignoró una pregunta de CNN sobre si la administración puso en riesgo a los reporteros y al personal.Aunque todavía hay mucho que no se conoce públicamente sobre la amenaza específica de Irán, el hecho de que al parecer fuera lo bastante creíble como para este cambiazo socava de forma contundente las afirmaciones de Trump de que las capacidades militares de Irán han sido diezmadas.Trump no solo ha afirmado esto, sino que él y el secretario de Defensa Pete Hegseth han citado específicamente la supuesta incapacidad de Irán para derribar aeronaves.Hegseth dijo en marzo que Estados Unidos e Israel pronto tendrían “control completo de los cielos iraníes” y un “espacio aéreo incontestado”.“Literalmente tenemos aviones volando sobre Teherán y otras partes de su país; no pueden hacer nada al respecto”, añadió Trump el 24 de marzo.Trump también dijo que Irán no tenía “marina”, “ejército”, “fuerza aérea” ni “sistemas antiaéreos”.Por supuesto, poco después de todos estos comentarios, Irán a principios de abril logró derribar dos aviones estadounidenses. Pero la idea de que pudiera plausiblemente derribar al Air Force One socava aún más las afirmaciones de Trump.“Si necesitaban tomar medidas tan extraordinarias para proteger al presidente porque el nivel de amenaza era tan alto, el pueblo estadounidense merecía saber que el nivel de amenaza era tan alto en este caso en particular”, dijo el lunes en CNN el exasesor de la Casa Blanca de Obama David Axelrod en “The Source with Kaitlan Collins”.En un plano más amplio, este desarrollo complica la trama de una saga ya confusa que involucra al Air Force One, preocupaciones de seguridad y los esfuerzos de la Casa Blanca por contener esa historia —incluyendo la emisión de controvertidas citaciones a reporteros de The New York Times—.Ya había preguntas válidas sobre la decisión inicial de no dejar que Trump volara su avión regalado por Catar de regreso desde Turquía. Si el avión no era tan seguro como el avión legado, ¿por qué Trump lo estaba volando en absoluto, particularmente en espacio aéreo extranjero? Sugería que el deseo de Trump de poner en el aire el codiciado avión nuevo podría haber llevado a recortar medidas (lo cual es un tema recurrente con él).Luego la administración dio el paso extraordinario de citar a los periodistas del Times que habían informado que ese jet regalado por Catar fue sustituido por preocupaciones de seguridad. Afirmó que la situación involucraba a alguien “amenazando la seguridad nacional al filtrar información clasificada”. Pero la administración retiró las citaciones dos semanas después, después de que un juez dejara claro que era escéptico sobre su argumento.CNN también ha informado que ha habido una amplia investigación interna dentro de la administración, y que a algunos funcionarios se les ha pedido entregar sus teléfonos.La historia sin duda involucra cuestiones de seguridad nacional. Pero, ¿cuánto de este esfuerzo por identificar a los filtradores también tiene que ver con evitar la vergüenza asociada con la decisión apresurada y potencialmente peligrosa de Trump de insistir en volar su avión regalado por Catar? ¿O, potencialmente, con evitar revelar que se usó a personal y reporteros como señuelos?O quizá Trump simplemente no quería admitir que Irán tenía esas capacidades.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story