Skip to main content

El Pentágono deja sin corregir el total de bajas en su sitio web tras la desaparición de cifras de muertos y heridos

El sitio web del Pentágono que registra las bajas de guerra sigue mostrando información incorrecta casi un día después de que se redujeran las cifras de muertos y heridos de militares estadounidenses en la guerra con Irán, en lo que funcionarios del Departamento de Defensa calificaron como una “interrupción de datos”.

Los senadores demócratas enviaron una carta al secretario de Defensa, Pete Hegseth, el jueves por la noche, en la que exigían explicaciones sobre los problemas del sitio web y solicitaron un recuento completo de las bajas de guerra.

Cuatro muertes y decenas de heridos desaparecieron de los totales el jueves, después de que el sitio web del Sistema de Análisis de Bajas de Defensa (DCAS, por sus siglas en inglés) hubiera publicado correctamente a principios de semana el número total de soldados de Estados Unidos muertos en la guerra en 18. Cuatro soldados murieron —tres en Jordania y uno en Iraq— como parte de operaciones durante el fin de semana.

El presidente Donald Trump asistió el miércoles al solemne traslado de los restos de esos cuatro militares en la Base Aérea de Dover, Delaware. El presidente confirmó el total de 18 fallecidos durante una comparecencia ante la prensa el jueves, pero restó importancia a su relevancia.

“Uno es demasiado, pero son 18, mientras que en Vietnam perdimos 200.000”, dijo. El recuento oficial del Pentágono de muertes totales en Vietnam es de 58.220.

Las 14 que aún figuraban en el sitio web de DCAS hasta este viernes parecían incluir a un marinero que murió a principios de julio después de que el helicóptero en el que viajaba se estrellara en el mar Arábigo.

Funcionarios del Pentágono atribuyeron la caída a problemas técnicos y negaron que hubiera un intento intencional de ocultar el número de víctimas de la guerra, luego de que los medios informaran sobre el repentino descenso.

“El Departamento de Guerra es consciente de interrupciones temporales de datos en el sitio web del Sistema de Análisis de Bajas de Defensa”, dijo el portavoz principal del Pentágono, Sean Parnell, en una publicación en X. “Estas anomalías del sitio se resuelven actualmente en coordinación con las Fuerzas Armadas”.

CNN preguntó al Pentágono este viernes por qué no se habían corregido las cifras y si el Departamento de Defensa podría arreglar el problema subyacente para que los números fueran precisos en el futuro. El Pentágono no respondió hasta el momento de la publicación.

CNN, que monitorea el sitio web del DCAS, había observado fallas repetidas esta semana, con fluctuaciones en las cifras.

El Departamento de Defensa ha tardado en revelar las bajas durante la guerra, y los funcionarios han alegado motivos de seguridad. El lunes, Parnell reconoció que “casi 100 militares” habían resultado heridos en la guerra desde el 7 de julio, en un momento en que decenas de esas heridas no aparecían en los totales de DCAS.

Los 12 senadores demócratas que integran la Comisión del Senado de Servicios Armados firmaron una carta el jueves para pedir a Hegseth respuestas sobre qué estaba causando inexactitudes en el sistema DCAS y exigir un recuento completo de las bajas.

“El pueblo estadounidense, el Congreso, los militares y sus familias tienen derecho a un recuento completo y preciso del costo humano de la guerra”, decía la carta. “La información actualmente disponible al público sugiere que el departamento no ha proporcionado de manera consistente informes públicos de bajas oportunos y completos durante todo el conflicto”.

Incluso cuando aparentemente funciona correctamente, los datos de DCAS parecen mostrar un retraso significativo en las actualizaciones. Un funcionario del Pentágono dijo anteriormente que “pueden pasar varios días o incluso semanas para que una herida quede documentada en los sistemas militares” debido a los requisitos de evaluación médica y revisión. Sin embargo, el funcionario le dijo a CNN que la base de datos de DCAS se “actualiza regularmente”.

Hegseth ya había criticado la cobertura mediática sobre las muertes de militares y afirmó en una conferencia de prensa en marzo: “Cuando unos pocos drones logran pasar o suceden tragedias, es noticia de primera plana”.

“Lo entiendo”, añadió. “La prensa solo quiere hacer que el presidente se vea mal”.

Hegseth no mencionó las muertes de miembros del servicio para abrir su testimonio el martes, mientras que el presidente del Estado Mayor Conjunto, Dan Caine, mencionó a los cuatro que habían muerto durante el fin de semana mientras se sentaba junto a Hegseth, un patrón coherente con sus periódicas conferencias de prensa conjuntas durante los primeros días de la guerra.

The-CNN-Wire
™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.

The US Navy’s plan for almost 20 guided-missile subs and why that will matter around China

(CNN) — The US Navy this week announced a “pivotal shift” in its future submarine force, and it’s a move analysts say provides important insights into how Washington would fight any possible conflict in the Pacific, where China is rapidly building up its forces.The Pentagon announced that 19 planned nuclear-powered Virginia-class attack submarines (SSNs) would now be classified as guided-missile submarines (SSGNs) and fitted with the Virginia Payload Module (VPM), an 84-foot-long section which adds 28 missile-launch cells to the 12 on current versions of these subs.Those cells can be loaded with Tomahawk land-attack missiles as well as hypersonic vehicles. Combined with the stealthy abilities of submarines, this will provide the new boats with a crucial ability to get inside China’s missile defenses, analysts say.“Submarines are one of the few capabilities which can loiter forward, near or within the first island chain in relative safety,” said Sidharth Kaushal, senior fellow at the Royal United Services Institute (RUSI) in London, referring to the string of islands from Japan southward through Taiwan and the Philippines, inside of which Beijing can bring the most firepower to bear.“Second, hypersonic missiles represent a capability against which US adversaries – which otherwise enjoy robust air defenses – have more limited defenses,” Kaushal said. And getting the high-speed, maneuverable missiles closer to their targets strains adversary reaction time.Key strike platforms being retiredThe details of the new sub plan come at a critical time for the Navy.This year it is beginning to retire its four Ohio-class guided-missile subs. Those boats were converted to SSGNs 20 years ago from their nuclear deterrent role as ballistic-missile subs, or boomers, after the US and Russia reduced their nuclear forces with the 1993 START II treaty.Once armed with nuclear-tipped Trident ballistic missiles, the four reconfigured Ohio-class subs can carry up to 154 Tomahawks each, and have been prized assets for deterrence and combat missions around the globe.Speaking to CNN in 2021, Bradley Martin, a former Navy captain turned naval researcher at the RAND Corp think tank, called the Ohio-class SSGNs “the platform with the single largest ability to deliver conventional missile payloads.”During the 2025 Operation Midnight Hammer strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, an Ohio-class boat was called upon to augment B-2 bomber strikes.But one of the four Ohio-class SSGNs, the USS Georgia, began its deactivation process last month and the other three are scheduled to do the same over the next several years.Retirement of those boats will reduce the Navy’s undersea strike capability by up to 60%, according to the Washington, DC-based Submarine Industrial Base Council.The first of the Virginia-class SSGNs are not scheduled to join the fleet until 2029, so the Navy is likely to see a shrinkage in its missile strike capabilities in the meantime. The last of the new subs isn’t due to join the fleet until 2038.Current inventory includes at least 24 smaller versions of the Virginia class as well as around 20 older Los Angeles-class subs and three specialized Seawolf-class boats, so the Navy is not without conventional sub-launched missile capability.In the long run, leaders are confident the 19 new boats will prove suitable replacements for the Ohios.“These VPM-equipped SSGNs will ensure the Navy continues to dominate the undersea domain for decades to come. By integrating this additional payload capacity, we will have the ability to surge strike power to assure our allies, deter aggression, outmatch any adversary,” Vice Adm. Rob Gaucher, director of submarine programs, said in a statement.“Georgia and her sister ships proved the enduring value of combining undersea stealth with unmatched clandestine strike capability,” the chief of naval operations, Adm. Daryl Caudle, said.“The next generation of Virginia-class SSGNs builds on that legacy with greater survivability, adaptability, and sustained combat power,” Caudle added.Not a one-for-one swapAnalysts caution that the move from the Ohio class to the Virginia class is not a one-for-one trade, as a single Virginia-class sub will carry only about 26% of the missiles of an Ohio-class one. That means it will take four future boats to equal the firepower of one currently.Analyst Bryan Clark, a Hudson Institute senior fellow and former Navy officer, notes another key difference between the two – the Ohio class has two rotating crews while the Virgina class has only one, meaning the former could spend twice as long actually on patrol.But being able to disperse missiles over a greater number of platforms has its advantages, says Alessio Patalano, professor of war and strategy at King’s College, London.“They expand the number of platforms that can bring the fight deep into an enemy’s territory, and as such opponents will have to contend with more assets they have to track, or at least try to,” Patalano said.It’s a key point in any possible conflict over Taiwan, the democratically governed island that the Chinese Communist Party claims as sovereign territory despite never having controlled it.China has been in the midst of an aggressive submarine-building program in recent years.According to a February report from the International Institute for Strategic Studies, the PLA Navy ramped up its production of nuclear-powered submarines over the past five years to the point where it is launching subs faster than the US, threatening to negate a sea-power advantage that has long belonged to Washington.From 2021 to 2025, China’s submarine building surpassed that of the US in both numbers of subs launched – 10 to 7 – and tonnage – 79,000 to 55,500, says the report.In an attack sub configuration, that’s more hunters of US subs in regional waters.Beijing has been rapidly building its missile forces, too.In December 2024, the Pentagon estimated that China’s rocket force had boosted its missile supply by 50% in the preceding four years.The People’s Liberation Army wants “to set the conditions for the invasion of Taiwan,” Decker Eveleth, an associate research analyst at the non-profit national security group CNA and an expert on China’s missile forces, told CNN last year. “So that’s shooting at ports, shooting at helicopter bases, shooting at supply bases … shooting at anything that can theoretically let you bring support to Taiwan.”“They want to destroy things in theater and keep everything else out,” Eveleth said.This buildup comes at a time when the US military’s own munitions stockpiles have seen significant depletion since President Donald Trump’s decision to join Israel and bomb Iran.Close-in operationsAnalysts said the new Virginia-class subs help negate China’s missile advantage, especially in the early days of any conflict.US subs that can get inside that first island chain would be in prime position to take out radars and command posts that would be coordinating defenses and helping Chinese missile targeting, analysts said.That could “degrade an adversary’s anti-surface capabilities to a level sufficient to enable other platforms such as surface ships to be moved forward at less risk, thus setting the conditions for aircraft carriers to provide follow-on strikes,” RUSI’s Kaushal said.Hypersonic launch capabilities enhance the new Virginia class further, analysts said, noting that testing of a hypersonic glide vehicle is well underway.They help give the newest Virginia class “a genuine uplift in the strike function,” said Patalano at King’s College.“That’s what gives an adversary an extra moment of pause,” he said.What can’t be forgotten, however, is that China won’t be standing still.At a military parade in Beijing last fall, China showed off a dizzying amount of new missiles, including a range of hypersonic vehicles, that many analysts say put the PLA at the forefront of that technology.Also in the parade ranks were new uncrewed submersible vehicles – underwater drones, stealthy in their own right, that could pose a threat to any of Beijing’s adversaries.The realities of that are surely obvious to the US Navy. But its leadership retains confidence in an area where it has been unmatched since World War II.“Armed with state-of-the-art sensors, unmatched stealth, and advanced automation, these reclassified SSGNs will operate with impunity in contested waters, ensuring the United States Navy maintains absolute undersea supremacy,” a Navy statement said.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story