Skip to main content

DOJ to dismiss Reflecting Pool vandalism charges, citing ‘botched installation’

▶ Watch Video: DOJ drops case against former Olympian accused of damaging Reflecting Pool

Federal prosecutors on Friday asked a judge to dismiss an indictment charging former U.S. Olympic canoeist David Hearn with ripping up the bottom of the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool, citing new information that the damage was caused by a “botched installation” by a contractor, not vandalism. 

The U.S. Attorney’s Office in D.C. had charged Hearn with felony destruction of government property, accusing him of causing more than $1,000 in damage to the sealant that was recently installed at the bottom of the Reflecting Pool. The project to renovate the pool was championed by President Trump.

Attorneys for Hearn — who strongly denied the vandalism allegations — said in a statement the government “owes Mr. Hearn an apology.”

“The Trump administration’s case against Davey Hearn should have never been brought,” attorneys Norm Eisen, Mary Dohrmann and Steve Levin said. “Its dismissal today does not erase the abuse of government power in arresting and charging a patriotic American who did nothing wrong. The government’s approach was ready, fire, aim.”

The U.S. Attorney’s Office declined to comment. CBS News has reached out to the Justice Department, the contractor that installed the sealant and the Department of the Interior, which managed the project.

The decision to drop the case against Hearn marks a significant backtrack for federal prosecutors. Shortly after the new “American Flag Blue” sealant was installed at the bottom of the Reflecting Pool at the president’s direction, passersby began to notice chunks of the material were peeling off the bottom of the pool and an algae bloom had turned the water green. Mr. Trump frequently insisted the peeling was caused by vandals, not problems with the more than $10 million project.

“Who would do such a thing?” the president wrote in a Truth Social post on June 20 that also mentioned several arrests.

Hearn, a 67-year-old from Bethesda, Maryland, said he was arrested and held for several hours. 

U.S. Attorney for D.C. Jeanine Pirro later unveiled an indictment against Hearn, accusing him of damaging “a national treasure.” Pirro accused Hearn of “forcefully and violently pulling up and removing the bottom liner with both hands,” and was told to stop by a National Park Service employee, drawing an angry response from Hearn.

Hearn denied any wrongdoing. Shortly after his arrest, he told The Associated Press he touched a chunk of pool liner that was still attached, but let go after a worker told him to stop.

“I’m a curious citizen,” Hearn said at the time. 

In Friday’s court filing, prosecutors conceded the damage was actually “the result of flawed installation by the contractor, Atlantic Industrial Coatings (“AIC”), and the rush to complete the project prior to events associated with the America 250 celebration in the weeks surrounding Independence Day 2026.”

A person stops to look at the partially-drained Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool, Monday, July 13, 2026, in Washington.
A person stops to look at the partially-drained Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool on July 13, 2026, in Washington, D.C. 

Jose Luis Magana/AP

Prosecutors said they did not become aware of those issues until two weeks ago, when they visited the site and “immediately noted extensive damage throughout the now-drained pool,” leading them to request more information from the Department of the Interior. Before then, they said, the department hadn’t shared information indicating the damage was “caused by anything other than the actions of the defendant and other vandals who damaged the pool’s lining.”

Citing internal documents provided by the Department of the Interior, the court filing describes a frenetic process to install the sealant, with frequent setbacks due to poor weather and reports of damage that emerged while the material was still being applied. 

One particularly tricky part of the process was the installation of sealant around the “expansion joints,” or gaps in the pool’s concrete bed to allow it to shift, according to Friday’s court filing. Prosecutors said the peeling that was referenced in Hearn’s case was caused by sealant that was sprayed around those joints.

A National Park Service employee noticed the sealant was peeling and sent an email to colleagues just days after the pool was refilled, more than a week before Hearn was arrested and on the same day as fencing was removed.

The pool was drained for repairs earlier this month, which Mr. Trump said was necessary “to fix the scars and damage that was done by the Vandals.” Hearn’s lawyers argued that move effectively spoiled the evidence that is being used to prosecute Hearn, leading a judge to warn that the government was “operating at its own peril,” according to The Washington Post.

Mr. Trump took a personal interest in overhauling the Reflecting Pool, which was first built in the 1920s and has long struggled with leaks, faulty filtration systems and perennial algae blooms that prior renovation projects failed to fix. The president told reporters in April he was disturbed by the pool’s “terrible” condition.

The government awarded no-bid contracts to a pair of companies: Atlantic Industrial Coatings, which was responsible for applying a sealant in the “American Flag Blue” color selected by Mr. Trump, and Green Water Solutions, a company owned by a Trump donor that makes water filtration systems.

It’s one of several renovation projects in and around Washington, D.C., that have drawn Mr. Trump’s interest. The president has also sought to replace the East Wing of the White House with a ballroom, build a gigantic triumphal arch across the Potomac River from the Lincoln Memorial, overhaul the Kennedy Center and renovate Dulles International Airport.

FIFA scraps its World Cup investment plan after backlash

▶ Watch Video: Global concern over FIFA's World Cup investment plan FIFA, world soccer's governing body, is shelving a controversial plan that would have allowed for billions of dollars in private commercial investment in the World Cup after the proposal was met with fierce opposition from its member nations.  "Having listened carefully to all the views, it has become clear that the project has created divisions of a nature that, regardless of the level of support, are no longer in the interest of the objective set out in the first place," FIFA President Gianni Infantino said in a statement Friday evening.Earlier this week, the British newspaper The Times first revealed Infantino's secret plan, called FIFA Forward Enterprise, or FFE, under which FIFA would have created a commercial rights and event operations company, 20% of which would be sold to private investors with FIFA retaining ownership of 80%. FIFA had said that FFE would be given an initial evaluation of $20 billion, with $4.2 billion going to "carefully selecting long-term investors."FIFA confirmed in an earlier statement that Thrive Eternal, a venture spearheaded by Joshua Kushner, the brother of President Trump's son-in-law Jared Kushner, was "expected to lead the proposed investor group." Thrive Eternal is a subsidiary of Thrive Capital, an investment firm owned by Joshua Kushner.  FIFA had estimated that under the deal, the 211 member associations of FIFA would see their so-called FIFA Forward Funding rise from $8 million per four-year cycle to approximately $20 million.On Tuesday, a source close to Thrive Capital told CBS News that criticism of the firm's involvement was unjustified. "I think the first assumption is that Trump was involved in FFE in any capacity, which is just not accurate," the source told CBS News. "Josh himself does not have any links with the administration, he does not have any political roles, he has not donated to them, he is not involved in any capacity. If you look at his donation record, all of the causes he has donated to are Democrat … it's kind of unfair to assume a lot about somebody just because of what their brother does."The blowback from Infantino's proposal was swift. UEFA, Europe's powerful soccer federation, announced Thursday that its 55 members had agreed to boycott the World Cup if Infantino pushed forward with his project, calling it "irresponsible and indefensible." "The World Cup cannot be treated as an investment product," UEFA said. "It is one of football's greatest sporting legacies," adding that "the World Cup is not for sale."North America's soccer governing body, the 41-member Confederation of North, Central American and Caribbean Association Football, followed suit, rejecting the plan and questioning "the need for private equity investment to fund new and existing FIFA Forward programs following the most profitable FIFA World Cup in history." CONCACAF, however, stopped short of making a boycott threat.On Friday, the Asian Football Confederation released a statement in which it didn't outright reject the plan, but said that it stood "in solidarity with UEFA and CONCACAF in expressing serious concerns over FIFA's proposal to introduce private investment into FIFA's flagship competitions and the decision-making process around FFE."  Also Friday, Carlos Cordeiro, one of Infantino's senior advisers, resigned from his post, saying in a statement that he could not "stand by while FIFA considers selling a stake in the World Cup." "The FIFA Forward Enterprise project was intended to provide a basis for further strengthening our FIFA Member Associations and our sport worldwide, especially in those countries where support is most needed," Infantino said Friday. "And more so, as we said from the outset, to do this only if a majority of the FIFA Member Associations were in support and always subject to a consultation process with them, the FIFA Council, the Confederations and wider stakeholders."
Read Next Story