Skip to main content

Clayton faces questions about election integrity, vows to enhance trust in DNI

▶ Watch Video: Why didn’t Clayton, Trump’s pick for director of national intelligence, testify?

Washington — Jay Clayton assured senators Wednesday that if he’s confirmed as director of national intelligence, he’ll be “mission-focused and team-oriented” in his approach and will work to strengthen coordination between the intelligence community and the American public. 

Clayton said in his opening statement for his Senate confirmation hearing that as DNI, he would focus on “enhancing the trust of the American people in the ODNI.” Citing his tenure as the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, Clayton said that the job has given him “significant national security experience,” including on matters involving foreign terrorist organizations, counter-espionage, money laundering and bribery and the abuse of communications platforms “to create and sow distrust.” 

He told senators he’s acted as the principal liaison with senior officials at the Treasury, State and Defense departments and advised officials on various matters in his former capacity as head of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Clayton’s testimony came after President Trump abruptly canceled plans to move forward with his nomination to the post last month. In June, Mr. Trump pushed Senate Republicans to cancel his own nominee’s hearing, saying Clayton’s nomination should not move forward until the Senate approved a replacement for him in his current role as U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York. Mr. Trump also suggested that the nomination process was moving too quickly and would prevent his controversial pick for acting intelligence chief, Bill Pulte, from temporarily taking the helm. 

Mr. Trump’s selection of Pulte, a housing official, as acting director roiled the Senate last month, and led Democrats to refuse to agree to an extension of a warrantless surveillance program under Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. Senate Republicans had been moving quickly to confirm Clayton with the hope of breaking a logjam on the surveillance program a few days after it expired. But the president dashed those plans when he pushed for the mid-June hearing to be canceled. 

Soon afterward, Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Tom Cotton announced that the hearing had been postponed. The Arkansas Republican called it “regrettable that the president has directed Jay Clayton not to appear at his confirmation hearing.”

As Clayton appeared Wednesday for his belated confirmation hearing, Section 702 remained lapsed, and Pulte has been the acting DNI since June 19. 

In his opening statement, Cotton praised Clayton, calling him a “seasoned professional in both government and private practice” and someone who’s “operated with morality, decency and integrity.” The Arkansas Republican also expressed his view that the Office of the Director of National Intelligence should be pared down, saying, “the right number of staff at the ODNI would number in the dozens, maybe a couple hundreds at the maximum, but certainly not the thousands of recent years.” 

Cotton said, that “Congress intended the ODNI to be a lean and efficient organization to keep bureaucratic intelligence agencies at bay,” and now, 20 years later, “the ODNI has unfortunately become yet another bloated agency that incentivizes bureaucratic make-work as opposed to genuine intelligence work.”

The chairman also asked Clayton whether he had been involved in anything pertaining to an address the president plans to deliver Thursday night, which could relate to intelligence concerning allegations of election fraud. Clayton replied that he was “not involved.” When asked by Democratic Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia, the vice chairman, about the outcome of the 2020 election, Clayton said “I’m not an election denier.”

“Joe Biden was certified as the president of the United States,” he added.

But Democrats continued to press Clayton on election integrity and his view of the outcome of the 2020 election during the hearing. In a notable exchange with independent Sen. Angus King of Maine, who caucuses with Democrats, Clayton said, “The government processes for gathering, aggregating and providing data need to be improved greatly.” He added that “the audit trail that we have available for our elections in a number of places is not the kind of audit trail that you would expect in something that is this important.”

Pressed by King on whether he thinks the U.S. has a problem with voter fraud, Clayton said, “I don’t think we can say definitively whether there is or is not until we have better processes.”

“I would love for the American people to have incredible confidence in the integrity of our elections,” Clayton said.

The top intelligence post became open after former Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard said in May that she would resign due to her husband’s cancer diagnosis. The next week, Mr. Trump announced Pulte as acting director. And after intense pushback over the pick, and pressure from Senate Republicans to select a long-term director, Mr. Trump announced Clayton would be his permanent pick for the role on June 11 — hours before the warrantless surveillance authority was set to expire. 

Clayton is well regarded by Republicans and Democrats and leads the U.S. Attorney’s Office in one of the highest-profile and most prestigious jurisdictions in the country. He had a lengthy career at the law firm Sullivan & Cromwell, which is representing the president in his appeal of his criminal conviction for hiding a $130,000 payment to adult film star Stormy Daniels, as well as his appeal in a civil fraud lawsuit brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James.

Democratic Sen. Ron Wyden of Oregon pressed Clayton on about subpoenas he issued to three New York Times journalists last week after they reported that the new Air Force One, which was donated by Qatar, does not have all of the advanced security features possessed by the older planes. The Times said that the journalists were ordered to testify before a Manhattan federal grand jury on Wednesday, the same day as Clayton’s confirmation hearing.  

Clayton said the subpoenas were “in connection with an ongoing national security investigation,” but he offered to speak more to the committee about the approach to limiting “to the greatest extent possible, any intrusion into the operation of the free press.”

“I am absolutely committed to and respect our First Amendment and the role of the press,” Clayton said. 

El Departamento de Justicia intenta desvincular a Todd Blanche de la acusación contra Comey por la supuesta amenaza “8647”

El Departamento de Justicia declaró en un documento judicial que sus altos mandos no participaron en la decisión de imputar penalmente al exdirector del FBI, James Comey, por publicar en redes sociales en 2025 una fotografía de conchas marinas dispuestas formando el número “8647”.La fotografía generó controversia, ya que el número 86 suele referirse a desechar o deshacerse de algo, y Donald Trump es el presidente número 47. Los fiscales afirman que la publicación constituye una amenaza contra la vida de Trump, algo que Comey ha negado.Para desvincular al secretario de Justicia, Todd Blanche, de la toma de decisiones, el documento presentado el martes por la noche indica que fue Ellis Boyle, fiscal federal del distrito este de Carolina del Norte, quien impulsó la acusación contra uno de los principales opositores de Trump. Al revelar el enfoque de Boyle, el Departamento de Justicia espera convencer a un juez de que Comey no fue blanco de una venganza por parte de los fiscales debido a la animosidad del presidente hacia él.“Comey intenta presentar la decisión de acusarlo como resultado de una directiva del Presidente o del secretario de Justicia. Eso es simplemente falso”, escribieron los fiscales en la presentación judicial ante el tribunal federal del este de Carolina del Norte el martes. “El Fiscal Federal Boyle investigó el asunto al asumir su cargo y tomó la decisión sin ninguna influencia del secretario de Justicia, y mucho menos del Presidente”.Sin embargo, el Departamento de Justicia afirma en la presentación que Boyle le comunicó al secretario de Justicia que los fiscales solicitarían la acusación contra Comey por la publicación de la concha marina el día antes de que un jurado investigador la aprobara esta primavera.“De hecho, Boyle ni siquiera discutió la decisión de presentar cargos con el secretario de Justicia hasta el día anterior a presentar el caso ante el jurado investigadir, y lo hizo entonces para que el secretario de Justicia estuviera al tanto de la posible publicidad relacionada con la acusación, tal como lo estipula el Manual de Justicia”, escribieron los fiscales.Blanche —quien en ese momento era la número dos del Departamento de Justicia, como secretario de Justicia adjunto— y el Director del FBI, Kash Patel, apoyaron públicamente la acusación de Boyle contra Comey en Carolina del Norte, y ambos ofrecieron declaraciones a la prensa el día de la acusación en Washington junto a Boyle.La acusación por el caso de las conchas marinas en abril representó la segunda vez que Comey fue acusado por este Departamento de Justicia. Un caso anterior, en el que se le acusaba de mentir al Congreso, fue desestimado por un juez el año pasado después de que los procedimientos judiciales revelaran irregularidades en el enfoque del fiscal federal con sede en Virginia.Comey ha argumentado que ambos casos fueron el resultado de una actuación injusta del Departamento de Justicia para complacer los deseos políticos del presidente.Esta noticia está en desarrollo y será actualizada.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story