Skip to main content

Carly Simon reveals Parkinson’s diagnosis: ‘Learning how to live with it’

▶ Watch Video: Singer Carly Simon announces Parkinson’s diagnosis

Carly Simon announced Monday that she has Parkinson’s disease and also revealed she was treated for basal cell carcinoma, a type of skin cancer.

The “You’re So Vain” singer said she received the Parkinson’s diagnosis after experiencing a decline in mobility.

“Eventually, there were periods when I could not walk without considerable help,” she said in the statement obtained by CBS News. “My family and I knew something more was going on.”

Simon, 83, said she has started treatment for the disease, which can cause stiffness, slowed movement, impaired balance, speech changes and tremors. There isn’t a known cure for Parkinson’s, but medications can ease some of the symptoms, according to the Mayo Clinic.

Simon said her medication helps with stiffness and other symptoms, but the severity of the neurodegenerative disorder still ebbs and flows.

“There is no tidy or predictable schedule to the illness. It does not consult my calendar before deciding what kind of day I am going to have,” she said. The singer also noted how Parkinson’s “can affect much more than the body,” sometimes causing “anxiety, depression, exhaustion, and apathy” as well.

She said experiencing the apathy that can accompany her disease has been “particularly strange.”

“You can find yourself lying there like a starfish drying in the sun, arms pointing in all directions, while nothing inside is telling you to get up, read, watch, write, sing, call someone, or do much of anything at all,” she said. “That has been one of the hardest things to explain. It is not simply sadness or laziness. It is as though the part of the brain that sends out invitations to participate in life has temporarily misplaced the guest list.”

Amid her Parkinson’s diagnosis and treatment, Simon was also treated for basal cell carcinoma on her face. She said the surgery to remove the cancer further isolated her, as it affected her appearance and made her self-conscious. 

“I have always been more critical of my appearance than anyone else could possibly imagine (check out the irony of having written “You’re So Vain.”), and this gave my inner critic quite a lot of new material,” she said.

But, at the same time, Simon was recording a new record — her first in 18 years — called “Comes in Waves.” It’s due for release next month. 

“Working on the music gave shape to days that did not always have much shape,” said Simon. “It gave me somewhere to go without having to leave the room. It reminded me that illness can change your life without becoming the whole of your life.”

Simon called Parkinson’s “difficult, frustrating, and sometimes frightening.”

“I am still learning how to live with it and how to accept it without feeling that I have surrendered something essential,” she said. “I am still writing, singing, imagining, laughing, worrying, remembering, and occasionally getting trapped in an overstuffed chair.”

Simon rose to prominence in the 1970s. She went on to win multiple Grammy Awards and was inducted into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame in 2022.

Why warnings about the US munitions stockpile look increasingly pivotal

(CNN) — Just days before the Iran war began, the United States’ top military official, Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Gen. Dan Caine, expressed misgivings.One of Caine’s biggest concerns? How war with Iran could further deplete munitions stockpiles that had already been reduced by helping Ukraine and Israel in their wars in recent years, The Washington Post and CNN reported.That warning is looking increasingly prescient and pivotal, as the Trump administration struggles to wind down a war that has lasted much longer than it previewed.But the administration is struggling to reconcile exactly where things stand on the all-important issue of munitions.On the one hand, it has claimed the US has more than enough munitions — even that Trump has vastly increased the munitions and that the number is “unlimited.” On the other, it has blamed the Biden administration for depleting the stockpiles and asked for a ton of money to help replenish them, while warning about shortfalls if Congress fails to provide it.“We’re in very good shape,” Trump said Monday. “But for some of the more sophisticated stuff, we’d certainly like to have more. (Former President Joe) Biden gave a lot of it away.”The president claimed his predecessor had given away “numbers that nobody’s ever seen before.”US Ambassador to the United Nations Michael Waltz’s interview on NBC News’ “Meet the Press” on Sunday was also a case in point for the administration’s confusing messaging.When asked about reporting from CNN and others that Caine had again raised concerns about the stockpile in recent days — shortly before the US paused its strikes on Iran on Friday — Waltz, like Trump, blamed the Biden administration.“(Defense) Secretary (Pete) Hegseth inherited a depleted situation from not only Ukraine, but also the ongoing fight with the Houthis under the Biden administration, and a depleted military under the Biden administration,” Waltz said.But when pressed by NBC’s Kristen Welker on whether he was admitting the stockpiles were indeed depleted, Waltz claimed he wasn’t.“No, I want to be crystal clear: The US military — and I’ve verified this every which way — has everything that it needs to conduct this campaign as effectively as it needs to be,” he said.Waltz’s comment walks a fine line.As CNN has reported, the risk with the munitions stockpile isn’t so much that the United States won’t have enough to finish prosecuting the Iran war; it’s in how much the war might deplete the stockpile for future wars the United States might feel compelled to get involved in.That includes exigencies like if China were to invade Taiwan. A depleted US stockpile could even embolden China to do something it might not otherwise attempt.The administration’s confusing comments about munitions date to the earliest days of the conflict with Iran.After multiple reports about such concerns around the time the war started, the administration dismissed the issue out of hand.“We have massive amounts of ammunition,” Trump said on March 4.Hegseth added March 5 that there was “no shortage of munitions” and that “our munitions are full up.”“We have tremendous amounts of ammunition,” Trump said March 26, adding that “we’re packed.”But even in his March 4 comments, the president also seemed to suggest — as he did Monday — that certain types of munitions could be an issue.While he said the United States had “unlimited middle and upper ammunition,” he cast the “high end” munitions slightly differently. There, he said, “we gave away a lot of high end, but we have plenty.”By April 21, CNN reported that classified Pentagon data aligned with a Center for Strategic and International Studies analysis showing sharp declines in some of those “high end” munitions. The analysis said the administration had used at least 45% of its Precision Strike Missiles, at least half of its THAAD missiles, almost 50% of its Patriot air defense interceptor missiles and about 30% of its Tomahawk land-attack missiles.By April 30, Hegseth at a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing seemed to confirm it would take “months and years” to replenish certain types of munitions (before trying to emphasize the “months” rather than “years”).At a House hearing May 12, Hegseth said the munitions issue had been “foolishly and unhelpfully overstated” in the media, saying, “We have plenty of what we need.”But Caine was more circumspect at the same hearing. He merely said that the military had “sufficient munitions for what we’re tasked to do right now” — with the phrase “right now” potentially looming large.By June, Hegseth told CBS’ “Face the Nation” that “our stockpiles are great, and they’re only getting stronger” — despite having said less than two months earlier that it would take months or years to replenish them.But then, while asking Congress for more money at a Senate hearing last week, Hegseth said that without the money, “we face critical shortfalls that threaten our ability to … rapidly replenish equipment and munitions.”At the same hearing, Appropriations Chairwoman Susan Collins in her opening statement twice cited “shortfalls” in munitions and said they had been “known to this committee for some time.” Hegseth did not correct the Maine Republican.The munitions issue is undoubtedly a difficult one.On the one hand, it’s potentially alarming if the administration is significantly depleting important types of high-end munitions — especially by continuing to use them in an unpopular war that doesn’t seem to be nearing an end.It’s a bit like throwing good money after bad. And replacing those munitions, as Hegseth acknowledged at one point, isn’t just a matter of money; it’s also a matter of the time it takes to produce them.That raises the prospect that the Iran war hasn’t just been a lost cause, but also that it has potentially harmed national security and the United States’ ability to deter nefarious foreign actors in the near-term future.On the other hand, if the munitions are being significantly depleted, it’s not particularly helpful to the US for those foreign actors to know that.Whatever the true state of the munitions stockpile, it’s a sleeping giant of an issue for the Trump administration.It’s one that not only looms large over how long the administration can continue the Iran war. But it could also linger over American foreign policy whenever the war concludes.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story