Skip to main content

Berlin Pride attack suspect with ISIS ties raised red flags, group says

▶ Watch Video: Suspect in Berlin Pride attack linked to ISIS was headed to deradicalization program, officials say

The suspect in the Berlin LGBTQ+ Pride parade attack, who officials said was known to have ties to ISIS, was about to be disqualified from a deradicalization program after staff saw red flags, one of the program’s leaders told CBS News on Monday.

Officials said Abdul Ballout, a 21-year-old German-born citizen with Lebanese roots, plowed a vehicle into celebrants at one of Europe’s largest Pride events on Saturday night before apparently cutting others with a machete. One woman was killed, and at least 29 others were injured in the attack.

Ballout was shot and killed in a Berlin suburb on Sunday in a confrontation with police, ending a 24-hour manhunt.

He had recently been sent to a deradicalization program for screening, but the group said it was planning to tell authorities that his cooperation appeared “fake.”

“Why didn’t authorities start this process very much earlier? He was known for being a radical for a long time,” Cornelia Lotthammer, the organization’s communications director, said in an interview with CBS News.

German Chancellor Friedrich Merz on Monday told reporters he wanted to know how the attack could have been prevented.

“We must do everything to protect people in Germany as best possible from such criminals, from dangerous people who for whatever reason can’t be taken into custody,” he said.

Police said they believe Ballout rented the vehicle used in the attack.

The woman who died in the attack was a Polish national, the foreign ministry in Warsaw said Monday.

Suspected attacker on the Cristhoper Street Parade shot dead in Berlin
Police near the site where the suspected attacker was fatally shot during a special operation in the Spandau district, in Berlin, Germany, on July 26, 2026.

Volodymyr Sindieiev/Anadolu via Getty Images

Suspect’s ties to Islamist extremism

Authorities said Ballout was born in Germany and that his mother was naturalized in 2002, three years before he was born. They also said Ballout was known to police after multiple incidents, including back in 2019 when he was found guilty of assaulting a victim in the schoolyard of a Berlin high school. Two years later, in 2022, Ballout was also convicted in juvenile court for assault and extortion with the intent to rob.

However, the first signs of extremism were in 2024 when Ballout shared two posts of ISIS propaganda on his Instagram page, according to information provided to CBS News by Berlin prosecutors.

The following year, he traveled to Lebanon “with the intention of proceeding from there to Syria to join ISIS,” the prosecutors’ office said. However, Ballout was arrested and jailed in Lebanon. He returned to Germany in November 2025 after completing his sentence and was arrested at the Berlin airport.

A public information screen displays a Berlin police appeal
A public information screen displays a Berlin police appeal for information about Abdul Ballout, the suspected attacker.

Vasily Krestyaninov/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images

In May, a juvenile court in Berlin convicted Ballout for “preparing a serious act of subversive violence,” publishing ISIS propaganda on Instagram and other charges, prosecutors said. He was sentenced to a year and 10 months in jail.

Despite appeals, Ballout was given a suspended sentence, partially in recognition of the time he had spent in jail in Lebanon and pre-trial detention, and partially because he admitted to the crimes and distanced himself from ISIS, prosecutors said.

Separately, on July 3, just over three weeks before Saturday’s attack, police searched Ballout’s home in Berlin-Schöneberg, prompted by an initial suspicion of a violation of Germany’s Weapons Act, according to information provided to CBS News by Berlin prosecutors. They left after only a toy gun was found during the search and the case was subsequently dismissed.

Intelligence sources told CBS News preliminary information does not suggest any nexus between the alleged attacker and the United States.  

Deradicalization program saw red flags

After his release, the court ordered Ballout to attend a deradicalization program for high-risk offenders. He was evaluated twice by the Berlin-based Violence Prevention Network, which works with people at risk from right-wing extremism and Islamism. A third and final evaluation was scheduled for Monday.

Cornelisa Lotthammer, the organization’s communications director, told CBS News on Monday that the staff had a “strong impression” that Ballout was not apt for their program because “he was very radicalized and for a long time.”

She said staff determined that there was “fake cooperation” from Ballout throughout the screenings.

“Our colleagues could tell that he wasn’t very interested in a real deradicalization process,” Lotthammer said.

“He gave the answers they wanted to hear. But of course, our colleagues noticed this,” she said, adding, “One red flag is when you notice that the answers are answers he thinks you want to hear.”

Ballout did not show any signs he was planning an imminent attack, Lotthammer said, adding that if staff had any hint of danger, they would have called the police.

She declined to comment on who had the responsibility for the suspect being free, saying it was a question for authorities.

“We did what we were supposed to do,” Lotthammer said. 

She explained that the group works with people who have detached themselves from extremist ideology and started “thinking [for] themselves.” “We help them with a flat and with a job. We have to make sure that this person gets totally integrated into society,” she said.

She also pushed back on criticism of such deradicalization efforts, saying that many people they have worked with didn’t commit any attacks afterward.

“They also count,” she added.

Berlin reels from the violence

The attack occurred a few hundred yards from the Brandenburg Gate during a celebration that was supposed to close out the city’s Pride festival.

In the hours after, hundreds of mourners gathered at a makeshift memorial at the iconic gate. They hugged each other and laid down flowers, candles, rainbow flags and homemade signs.

GERMANY-LGBTQ+-PARADE-CSD-TRIBUTE
Tributes including flowers, condolence placards, candles and rainbow flags line the ground in front of the landmark Brandenburg Gate in Berlin on July 27, 2026.

John MACDOUGALL /AFP via Getty Images

“This is not normal; those are just people; they should not be judged or killed for their choice of love,” one woman at the memorial told CBS News on Monday.

“It’s not normal that someone we know can be dangerous; we don’t do anything about it… of course, I’m mad,” another mourner added.

Julian Miething, who had attended the event, told the AP on Sunday that it was a “dark day for the community.”

Rise in ramming attacks 

The attack is the latest in a series that have left the country grappling with concerns about public safety.

Six people were killed and hundreds injured when a car plowed into a Christmas market in Magdeburg in December 2024. Two months later, a car drove into trade union demonstrators in Munich, killing a woman and her 2-year-old daughter. Two more people were killed in March 2025 when a car rammed into a crowd in Mannheim.

The attacks have different alleged motives, but together have kept immigration, security and extremism at the center of German politics. The debates have also fueled support for the far-right Alternative for Germany party, or AfD, and put pressure on Merz and Germany’s mainstream political parties as they try to convince voters they can keep the country safe. 

Fact check: Every single part of this Trump story about South Korea is wrong

(CNN) — President Donald Trump told a story about South Korea on Monday. Every single part of it is false.Trump has delivered versions of his fictional story before; CNN debunked one telling last year. The president delivered Monday’s version the day after he announced the US would reduce military exercises with South Korea – citing his “very good relationship” with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un and also mentioning that South Korea declined to participate in the US war with Iran.The latest version of Trump’s tale, which you can watch in full here, went like this:South Korea “essentially” didn’t pay for the cost of the US military presence in the country before Trump first became president. Trump then got South Korea to unhappily agree to pay “$3 billion” in a year, with further increases the following year and the year after that. But then the 2020 election was “rigged” against him. When Joe Biden became president, South Korea convinced Biden that Trump was “probably a bad person” and they shouldn’t have to pay the money, so Biden “immediately rescinded” Trump’s “order.”Let’s walk through why all of this is wrong. The facts show that Trump’s comments include at least five separate inaccurate claims – in addition to his usual exaggeration of the size of the US military presence in South Korea, which he put at “39,000” but the Pentagon said was actually 26,589 as of the end of March.South Korea was paying for the US military presence before Trump’s first presidency.Here’s what Trump claimed Monday: “Just so you understand with South Korea, look: South Korea has been protected by us for many, many years, and during my first term, they agreed to pay close to $3 billion a year for protection, because we don’t – you know, they essentially weren’t paying.” Last year, he explicitly said South Korea’s cost-sharing payments didn’t exist before he became president.The reality: For decades before Trump took office, South Korea spent substantial sums to share the cost of the US military presence in the country; its cost-sharing “Special Measures Agreements” with the US began in 1991. Under the final five-year agreement signed before Trump became president in 2017, negotiated by the Obama administration, South Korea agreed to spend more than $800 million per year from 2014 through 2018. Trump is entitled to argue that this was insufficient, but it was far from not paying at all.It’s not true that Trump got South Korea to pay “$3 billion” in any year.Here’s what Trump claimed Monday: “But we agreed for a short term that it would be $3 billion…” Later in his remarks, he referred to the supposed arrangement as “$3 billion a year” from South Korea.The reality: Under a one-year Special Measures Agreement negotiated by the Trump administration in 2019, South Korea agreed to an 8.2% increase in its spending – but the new total was still less than $1 billion, not $3 billion.It’s not true that Trump got South Korea to agree to two subsequent increases.Here’s what Trump claimed Monday: “But we agreed for a short term that it would be $3 billion, and next year it would go up and the next year it would go up, so that they start paying for their protection.”The reality: Trump did not secure three years of spending increases. He did achieve the one-year increase for 2019, but negotiations on a post-2019 deal stalled amid Trump’s demands for a massive increase in South Korea’s contribution, and the talks were still unresolved when Biden took office in January 2021.South Korea did come to a narrower deal with the Trump administration in mid-2020 to spend $200 million that year to pay South Korean employees of US forces, who had been put on leave because Trump’s one-year deal expired at the end of 2019. Clearly, though, that wasn’t two years of spending hikes over the supposed “$3 billion.”It’s not true that the 2020 election was rigged.Here’s what Trump claimed Monday: “When the election was rigged and I ended up watching for four years and then coming back…”The reality: Trump was lying. He lost the 2020 election fair and square to Biden.It’s not true that Biden agreed to a South Korean demand to rescind Trump’s cost-sharing deal.Here’s what Trump claimed Monday: “And South Korea, I get along with them very well. But they were paying $3 billion a year and then they convinced Biden that I was probably a bad person and they shouldn’t. And he immediately rescinded that order.”The reality: Biden did not rescind any Trump cost-sharing agreement with South Korea. The only Special Measures Agreement signed by the Trump administration, the one-year 2019 deal, was dead by the time Biden took office in 2021 – and Biden’s administration proceeded to sign two new agreements, one in 2021 and one in 2024, that both included South Korean spending increases.The 2021 agreement – which retroactively covered Trump-era 2020 – included a South Korean spending increase of 13.9% in 2021, bringing the level to around $1 billion, then additional increases in 2022 through 2025 tied to increases in South Korea’s defense budget. The 2024 agreement included an 8.3% increase in 2026 and then additional increases from 2027 to 2030 tied to South Korean inflation.These were smaller hikes than Trump was demanding when he left office in early 2021. But, again, South Korea had not actually agreed to those Trump demands.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story