Skip to main content

Army to share findings of Kuwait attack probe with Gold Star families

▶ Watch Video: Wounded soldiers, families accuse Pentagon of downplaying injuries from Iranian strike

The Army has completed its investigation into the deadly Iranian attack on U.S. forces in Kuwait earlier this year, sources told CBS News, and Gold Star families were expected to be briefed Thursday on its findings.

Six Americans were killed in the March 1 strike on a tactical operations center at the Port of Shuaiba in Kuwait, one of several U.S.-allied countries in the Persian Gulf region that faced intense Iranian missile and drone attacks after the U.S. and Israel launched Operation Epic Fury, starting the war with Iran. The strike was the deadliest attack on U.S. troops in the Iran War to-date.

“Today, Army officials met with the families of those service members killed during the Port of Shuaiba attack for a private briefing,” an Army spokesperson told CBS News later Thursday. “Out of respect for the families and to preserve the integrity of those discussions, we will not provide additional details regarding the briefing or its contents at this time.”

U.S. Army Central and Third Army ordered the Pentagon probe “to determine the facts and circumstances” of the Iranian attack. But even before the review was underway, a CBS News investigation began shedding light on what several survivors of the attack described as “strategic failures” ahead of, during and after the strike.

One day after the deadly strike, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth described the Iranian drone as a “squirter” — suggesting that the drone managed to slip past the defenses of a fortified unit inside Kuwait. 

In April, one of the injured soldiers told CBS News that “painting a picture that ‘one squeaked through’ is a falsehood. The soldier said the unit was “unprepared to provide any defense for itself. It was not a fortified position.”

More witnesses to the attack claimed in interviews that there were multiple warnings related to force protection ahead of the unit’s February move to the Port of Shuaiba position. Soldiers later told CBS News that military leaders had seen intelligence showing Iran was targeting their position in Kuwait. Those reports sparked an investigation from Senate Democrats.

“We moved closer to Iran, to a deeply unsafe area that was a known target,” one senior official told CBS News on condition of anonymity. 

Asked to describe the degree of fortification of the unit, this official responded: “I mean, I would put it in the none category. From a drone defense capability … none.”

Other survivors recounted the chaotic moments in the moments after the drone slammed into their workspaces.

“This was a failure,” Maj. Stephen Ramsbottom said in an interview with CBS News. He said he believed Master Sgt. Nicole Amor could have survived her wounds had there been a doctor, a fixed aid station or more than one ambulance at the post. 

The Pentagon has repeatedly pushed back on claims that the Army tried to downplay the incident. 

In a post on X addressing prior CBS News reporting on the strike, Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell said “every possible measure has been taken to safeguard our troops — at every level” and that “[t]he secure facility was fortified with 6-foot walls.”

Soldiers lodge complaints against unit commanders

CBS News has interviewed more than a dozen soldiers who were on the ground at Shuaiba, as well as to the families and the loved ones of those who were killed.

The Pentagon declined to answer CBS News’ questions about the scope of the inquiry, including if any individual leaders were a main focus.

Several soldiers told CBS News they hoped the investigation would include a performance review of the commanders of the Iowa-based 103rd Sustainment Command, whom they blamed for ordering the troops to Shuaiba weeks before Operation Epic Fury, despite what the soldiers believed were known concerns.

“I feel incredibly let down by the leadership of this unit,” one soldier, speaking on condition of anonymity because of rigid media restrictions within the military, told CBS News.

“We knew what things were predetermined targets — not just which bases but specifically which locations on certain bases,” another soldier recounted. Asked if Shuaiba was on that list, the soldier said: “Yes, definitely.”

A complaint one unit member sent to the Army Inspector General, shared with CBS News, said the leadership “disregarded” the intelligence briefings and “yelled” at those who questioned the deployment to Shuaiba. 

CBS News has reached out to the Pentagon and to the 103rd Sustainment Command for comment.

Veintitrés años después, preparan una secuela de “Cómo perder a un hombre en 10 días”

Es posible que el helecho del amor esté volviendo a ponerse de moda.Tras más de 20 años, se está preparando una secuela de la exitosa comedia romántica “Cómo perder a un hombre en 10 días”, con su protagonista original, Kate Hudson, vinculada al proyecto, informaron fuentes a CNN.Hudson, quien protagonizó la película original en el papel de la columnista de revista Andie Anderson, producirá la secuela en Paramount junto con la productora de cine estadounidense Stacey Sher, cuyos créditos de producción incluyen películas galardonadas como “Pulp Fiction”, “Erin Brockovich” y “Django Unchained”, según confirmó a CNN una fuente cercana al proyecto.Según la fuente, el estudio está buscando un guionista y, en esta etapa inicial del desarrollo, no hay otros colaboradores involucrados. Variety fue el primer medio en informar sobre la noticia.Aún no está claro si Hudson o Matthew McConaughey, quien coprotagonizó la película junto a Hudson interpretando al exitoso publicista Benjamin Barry, retomarán sus papeles.CNN se ha puesto en contacto con los representantes de Hudson y McConaughey para obtener comentarios.Estrenada en 2003, “Cómo perder a un hombre en 10 días” narra la historia de Andie, una columnista de revista, que emprende un reportaje para demostrar que puede lograr que un hombre rompa con ella en 10 días.Su experimento periodístico pronto da paso a una relación de tira y afloja con Benjamin, quien apuesta con su jefe a que puede enamorarla.Según Variety, la película recaudó casi US$ 180 millones en todo el mundo en el momento de su estreno.Y el vestido amarillo de seda de Carolina Herrera que lució Hudson durante la película se ha convertido desde entonces en un momento visual icónico del cine.En los últimos años, Hudson y McConaughey habían respondido con modestia cuando se les preguntaba si se estaba preparando una secuela.Durante una aparición en el programa “Watch What Happens Live” de Bravo en 2024, le preguntaron a Hudson si había pensado en retomar su papel con McConaughey, a lo que respondió: “Creo que (los estudios) siempre están pensando en eso”.“Lo único que importa es el guion y si a Matthew y a mí nos gusta”, comentó Hudson. “Creo que ambos estamos totalmente abiertos a ello, simplemente nunca se ha dado la oportunidad”.En junio, coincidiendo con la victoria de los New York Knicks en las Finales de la NBA contra los San Antonio Spurs, Hudson compartió en Instagram dos fotogramas de la película en los que aparecían Andie y Benjamin en un partido, junto con el mensaje “Déjà vu”.Hace apenas unas semanas, McConaughey reveló que “Cómo perder a un hombre en 10 días” es su comedia romántica favorita en la que ha trabajado.En una entrevista con Josh Horowitz en el podcast Happy Sad Confused a principios de este mes, el actor describió la película de 2003 como “un regalo que nunca deja de dar”, y afirmó que todavía genera “el mejor dinero en efectivo que he recibido por correo de todas las películas que he hecho”.La noticia de la secuela llega apenas unos meses después del éxito de taquilla de “El diablo viste de Prada 2”, otra de las favoritas de los fans de principios de la década de 2000, que reunió al reparto original formado por Meryl Streep, Anne Hathaway, Stanley Tucci y Emily Blunt.Otras secuelas de películas populares de la década de 2000 también han tenido un éxito colosal este año: la nueva “Scary Movie” recaudó más de US$ 231 millones en todo el mundo y “Toy Story 5” recaudó más de US$ 1.128 millones en todo el mundo, según el sitio web de seguimiento de datos de taquilla, The Numbers.Este acontecimiento se produce mientras Paramount intenta fusionar sus operaciones de estudio cinematográfico y televisión con WBD, la empresa matriz de CNN, HBO, Discovery, el estudio Warner Bros. y muchos otros activos.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story