Skip to main content

Appeals court temporarily blocks DOJ release of Biden tapes with biographer

Washington — A federal appeals court temporarily blocked the Justice Department from turning over to a conservative think tank redacted transcripts and audio recordings of conversations former President Joe Biden had with his biographer roughly a decade ago.

A panel of three judges on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit agreed to issue an administrative injunction that stops the release of the material to the Heritage Foundation for 10 days. 

The court said in a brief unsigned order that the purpose of its injunction, which expires at 11:59 p.m. on July 20, is to “give the court sufficient opportunity to consider the emergency motion for an injunction pending appeal and should not be construed in any way as a ruling on the merits of that motion.”

The recordings at issue in the legal fight date back to 2016 and 2017, when Biden sat down with his biographer, Mark Zwonitzer, for his memoir, “Promise Me, Dad.” But they gained interest from the Heritage Foundation several years later following an investigation by former special counsel Robert Hur into Biden’s handling of sensitive government records after his vice presidency, which ended in 2017. The former president was not charged with any crimes stemming from Hur’s investigation.

The special counsel’s report, released in 2024, included passages that referenced Biden’s conversations with Zwonitzer. The special counsel wrote the recordings showed the former president’s “diminished faculties and faulty memory,” and said his conversations with Zwonitzer were “painfully slow, with Mr. Biden struggling to remember events and straining at times to read and relay his own notebook entries.”

Soon after Hur’s report was released, the Heritage Foundation filed a public records request for material the special counsel relied on to write specific portions of the report, including the excerpts that referred to Zwonitzer’s recorded conversations with Biden.

The Justice Department initially withheld the audio tapes and most of the written transcripts, citing certain exemptions under the Freedom of Information Act. But once President Trump returned to the White House, the department said it intended to provide the material to Congress and the Heritage Foundation.

Biden moved to intervene in a lawsuit the Heritage Foundation had filed in 2024 to force the release of the transcripts and tapes. But last month, a federal judge initially rejected a request from the former president to block the disclosure.

Shortly after she issued her decision, the judge, Dabney Friedrich, agreed to stop the Trump administration from releasing the information for three weeks to give the D.C. Circuit time to decide whether to take action itself. That order was set to expire at 5 p.m. Friday.

Biden’s lawyers had argued to the D.C. Circuit that disseminating his discussions with Zwonitzer would be harmful and likened their disclosure to the public release of diary entries or private text messages. 

“The private conversations at issue were never intended to be shared with a wider audience, and the Department has them only because it collected the recordings as part of a criminal investigation that resulted in no charges,” they argued in a filing.

Biden’s legal team also said there is no immediate need for the Heritage Foundation to access the material.

“This FOIA action has been pending for nearly two and a half years, and there is no meaningful public interest — let alone one that must be satisfied in the immediate days or weeks — in the disclosure of decade-old conversations of a former President who is now a private citizen, and who neither holds nor is seeking public office,” they said.

But the Justice Department said the public has an interest in seeing the information that Hur relied on during the course of his investigation.

“Releasing the materials will allow the public to assess the persuasiveness of Hur’s determinations,” department lawyers told the D.C. Circuit in court papers.

Former NBA player ejected from WNBA game following confrontation

Former basketball player Enes Kanter Freedom and Natasha Cloud of the Chicago Sky yell at one another during the second half between the Chicago Sky and the Indiana Fever, Aug. 23, 2026, in Chicago. (Michael Reaves/Getty Images)(NEW YORK) -- Former NBA player Enes Kanter Freedom was removed from a WNBA game between the Indiana Fever and Chicago Sky on Sunday, following a verbal confrontation with Sky guard Natasha Cloud.Kanter Freedom wore a black T-shirt to Sunday's game at Wintrust Arena in Chicago that read, "WOMAN: noun, adult human female."The shirt appeared to be a reference to the ongoing controversy over the WNBA's approach to transgender players' eligibility and comments from Fever guard Sophie Cunningham, who told ESPN in a July interview that the league should block biological males from participation.During a timeout in the third quarter of Sunday's game, Cloud was seen approaching Kanter Freedom, who was sitting courtside, shouting and pointing at him. Kanter Freedom then stood with his arms extended and stepped toward the court, before security escorted him out of the arena."I just got kicked out of a @WNBA game for supporting WOMEN! Let that sink in, AMERICA!" Kanter Freedom wrote in a social media post afterward.In a statement to ABC News on Monday, Kanter Freedom said he and Cloud had exchanged words after Cunningham scored a three-pointer, adding, "Then she started yapping and cursing at me then we got into it and they threw me out of the game."Kanter Freedom, who played in the NBA for 11 years, made headlines earlier this month after declaring his eligibility for the WNBA Draft in a social media post."If simply declaring who you are is all that's required, then I meet every single requirement necessary to compete in the WNBA," he wrote at the time.The WNBA's current player eligibility guidelines, found in article XIII of the league's collective bargaining agreement, state that "only players who are women are eligible to play in the WNBA." The CBA does not include specific rules about transgender players.Sources around the league told ABC News that Kanter Freedom, as well as Royce White, a former NBA player and Republican Senate candidate in Minnesota who also stated his intention to join the WNBA Draft earlier in August, are not eligible to play in the WNBA, calling their eligibility announcements a publicity stunt meant to sow division and draw attention.Cloud did not speak to the media after Sunday's game but shared her support for the transgender community on social media."To every trans kid/person, You are apart of MY community & tribe. You belong. You're loved. You're seen. You're perfect as you are. & you will always be protected by me," Cloud, a cisgender lesbian, wrote in a Threads post.Sky coach Tyler Marsh supported Cloud and the team after the game."Tash didn't want to feel like she was a distraction. I told her she wasn't," Marsh said in a post-game news conference. "I told her that we all embrace her as someone that protects our team and protects the people that need to be protected, and so, Tash is always going to stand on that, and we stand for Tash.""I think that there's so much good things about this league … that if you come to a game, you should probably come to enjoy the basketball, and that seems pretty simple to me," Marsh added when asked if he had a message for Kanter Freedom. "I think these players deserve that and have earned that. And being a former basketball player, you should probably understand and feel that too."ABC News reached out to the Chicago Sky and Indiana Fever for comment.Copyright © 2026, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story