Skip to main content

Angelina Resendiz’s mother says Navy policy changes are ‘a positive step’

Click here for updates on this story

    NORFOLK, Virginia (WTKR) — More than a year after the murder of Petty Officer Third Class Angelina Resendiz, the U.S. Navy has revised its policy for transferring sailors under investigation — a change the Navy says followed internal reviews after her death.

For Esmeralda Castle, Resendiz’s mother, the policy is an important step toward preventing similar tragedies.

“This is a positive step. This is requiring the commands to include more people, and and that that that means accountability, right? That means the transparency. That means you know, it’s not all on the commands to keep their unit and and their service members safe. Now this responsibility is going to be shared,” Castle told News 3.

The revised policy requires sailors under investigation for alleged sexual assault or stalking to be transferred only to shore commands unless operational needs prevent it. It also requires commanders to coordinate with the Naval Criminal Investigative Service (NCIS), Sexual Assault Response Coordinators and the receiving command to help protect alleged victims while preserving investigations. The policy also states temporary transfers cannot be used as punishment.

Castle said the changes address one of the biggest concerns her family had after her daughter’s death.

“Like why did they transfer this person, right? Why didn’t they protect the service members? Why didn’t anybody know who he was? Why he was there? You know, more could have been done, and so this policy kind of addresses those things. Like more people will know, the right people will know, and communication is supposed to continue. And those things are, you know, meant to protect everyone,” she said.

The Navy confirmed to News 3 that the policy revision came after reviews conducted following Resendiz’s murder.

Last month, fellow sailor Jermiah Copeland pleaded guilty to unpremeditated murder in Resendiz’s death. During his court-martial, Copeland admitted to strangling Resendiz aboard Naval Station Norfolk before moving her body to a wooded area. He was sentenced to more than 40 years in prison, received a dishonorable discharge and was reduced in rank.

While Castle welcomed the policy change, she said she believes accountability must extend beyond adopting new rules.

“What is going to you know hold these your individual commanders accountable for implementing the new policy, and not you know picking and choosing what what they’ll implement or what they’ll follow.”

Castle said she hopes her daughter’s death will continue to drive meaningful reforms throughout the military.

“I mean, it’s sad, right? But but is is good, right? The opportunity for good. These are the opportunities for good that that that we’re looking for, right?… we’re we’re we’re we’re we’re transforming it into something lasting, right? That’s going to, you know. Protect service members for for a very long time. This is just a step, right? It’s a small step. There’s still more work, right?”

Asked what she thinks Angelina’s legacy has become, Castle said she believes her daughter is still making a difference.

“Yeah, yeah, absolutely… she’s the guardian… warrior, right, protecting her service members, her brothers and sisters in service… Angie is a part of the reason why they they are choosing, right? To to change and and to make things better.”

Castle said actions, not words, are what matter most.

“The Navy isn’t a person, right? It’s a machine. The military is a machine, and you don’t forgive machines; you fix them, and that’s what we’re doing… when I see a policy, right, that’s an action to me… it doesn’t matter what they say, it’s what they do.”

Please note: This story was provided to CNN Wire by an affiliate and does not contain original CNN reporting. This content carries a strict local market embargo. If you share the same market as the contributor of this article, you may not use it on any platform.

Trump admin pressures law enforcement groups to support controversial cryptocurrency legislation

(CNN) — The Trump administration in recent weeks has pressured current and former US law enforcement officials to help corral support for a milestone cryptocurrency law that critics say could be exploited by narcotraffickers, terrorists, and other criminal groups, according to multiple people briefed on the matter.The pressure comes as the legislation has faced headwinds in the Senate, including from lawmakers who say it allows President Donald Trump to continue to benefit from his cryptocurrency earnings while in office.The campaign on law enforcement groups is part of a broad push led by White House officials, Republican lawmakers and acting Attorney General Todd Blanche to rebut concerns raised about parts of the proposed Clarity Act.The administration and cryptocurrency industry groups say, if passed, the law would bring regulatory certainty to the digital currency industry and ensure the sharing of information about illicit activity with law enforcement. At the urging of Democrats, the White House agreed to new ethics provisions that ban government officials, including Trump, from issuing new digital currency.Some critics, though, are focused on a part of the bill that allows Trump to keep benefiting from his cryptocurrency ventures, including $TRUMP memecoin, which was launched days before he took office. The proposed legislation wouldn’t prohibit those earnings. Those lawmakers also say the bill includes “loopholes” that leave room for Trump to enter new ventures and does not include an enforcement mechanism if he is found to be in violation in the restrictions that are included in the legislation.Supporters of the bill are hopeful it can pass before the Senate recess in August, but Senate leaders have warned about challenges ahead.Trump campaigned on promises to make the US the “crypto capital of the planet,” and since taking office in his second term, his administration has embraced the crypto industry. Trump issued an executive order to reduce regulatory burdens on the industry and to establish a national cryptocurrency reserve. At the Justice Department, Blanche shut down some cryptocurrency criminal investigations and disbanded a group of prosecutors and investigators who focused on cryptocurrency crimes as part of the National Cryptocurrency Enforcement Team.Some law enforcement groups, including the National District Attorneys Association and the International Association of Chiefs of Police, have warned that the proposed law does not do enough to ensure transparency and accountability among crypto companies. Their public safety concerns have complicated efforts to pass the legislation.Patrick Witt, a Pentagon official and executive director of the President’s Council of Advisors for Digital Assets, leaned on officials at the FBI and other agencies to try to join the effort in support of the Clarity Act, one US official briefed on the discussions told CNN.The outside agencies who represent current and former law enforcement and wield influence on legislation say they got a full court press. “Everybody in the law enforcement got hammered to support that legislation,” says an official with one law enforcement group who received calls from Trump administration officials and supporters of the bill.Reached on the phone, Witt declined to speak to CNN other than to point to law enforcement groups that have come out in support of the bill. These include the National Organization of Black Law Enforcement Executives and National Fraternal Order of Police, according to letters the groups have made public.The White House didn’t immediately return a request for comment.Crypto industry supporters say the legislation is needed because it helps companies better comply with legal requirements and keep criminals from using their platforms.“Nobody can say the bill doesn’t advance law enforcement’s ability to go after illicit activity,” Faryar Shirzad, chief policy officer for Coinbase, a cryptocurrency platform, told CNN in an interview.The critical groups took issue with possible gaps the law could leave in preventing the use of crypto to finance terrorism.“Several provisions throughout the bill will reduce transparency, limit accountability, and create gaps in the anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism framework that law enforcement relies upon to identify criminal activity, protect victims, and safeguard national security,” a slate of law enforcement associations said in a joint letter to Blanche last month.Trump’s stance on cryptoThe Trump administration’s embrace of crypto rewards an industry that boosted his election campaign millions of dollars in donations. Trump has since reported making more than $1.4 billion from cryptocurrency ventures in his first year back in office, according to the president’s most recent financial disclosures.Despite bipartisan support in the House, which passed a version of the legislation last year, the proposed bill has run into obstacles in the Senate. As some Democrats have used Trump’s own crypto profits to raise ethical questions about the law, the banking industry has assailed the bill as a giveaway to competitors.At issue are many of the anti-money laundering and know-your-customer regulations that banks and money service companies have to abide by. The US government has for years used those regulations to try to stop the flow of money to terrorist groups and narcotraffickers.Some cryptocurrency industry companies already register with regulators and follow some of the same rules. But in recent years, during the first Trump administration and the Biden administration, prosecutors have targeted some crypto-industry companies for running afoul of some registration requirements. The lack of regulations specific to the cryptocurrency industry has been a major problem, critics and supporters of the Clarity Act agree. Whether the proposed law goes far enough is another matter.Blanche, who is trying to win votes for his nomination as attorney general, has also spent time briefing outside groups to urge their support and seeking to assuage concerns, according to people involved in the discussions.A Justice Department spokesperson rejected some claims in the critical letter from the law enforcement groups.“The Administration works tirelessly to champion law enforcement through policy, funding, and legislation. The letter from these groups contains factual inaccuracies and mischaracterizes Administration policy,” the Justice spokesperson said. “The bill does not restrict DOJ’s ability to investigate or prosecute criminal activity involving digital assets, including drug trafficking, human smuggling, and terrorism financing.”At a Capitol Hill event this week, Sen. Richard Blumenthal, ranking member of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, highlighted the testimony of Americans who said they lost tens of thousands of dollars after investing in Trump cryptocurrency launched before the president’s second inauguration.Blumenthal cited the examples to call for more ethics safeguards in the Clarity Act.Scott Greytak, deputy executive director of Transparency International U.S. echoed Blumenthal and criticized new ethics provisions made to the bill, which ban the president from issuing new cryptocurrency. The provision applies only until the end of Trump’s term.“I’ve never seen ethics language that was cast so clearly only to accommodate a politician, President Trump,” he said.Among other issues, Greytak finds fault with the law’s exemptions for certain so-called decentralized financial transactions, which allow people to trade assets using software that doesn’t go through a third-party such as a bank.“You are legitimizing the ability of criminals to use this medium of value to commit crimes,” he said.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story