Skip to main content

After a year of tariffs, automakers are still resistant to moving production to the US

(CNN) — Toyota announced last week it would do something other automakers have been reluctant to do – shift some production from Mexico to the United States.

The Japanese automaker will soon build half of its best-selling midsize Tacoma pickups at an expanded plant in San Antonio, where it already builds the Tundra full-size pickup and Sequoia SUV. But it will also continue to build Tacomas in Mexico.

President Donald Trump heralded the shift to US soil, calling it “a really big deal” and proof of “Tariffs at work!”

Toyota didn’t cite tariff policy as the catalyst.

“While we are impacted by evolving trade policies, our investments are multi-decade decisions based on broader strategic goals,” the company told CNN.

And more than a year after the Trump administration announced sweeping auto tariffs to spur construction of new American factories, Toyota’s move is the exception, not the rule.

Moving production to US is difficult

Few automakers have announced plans to move production to the United States. Most automakers would rather pay tariffs than spend billions to build new facilities – and the product lines that are coming to the US are moving into existing factories.

Forty-six percent of the cars purchased by US consumers last year were imported, according to Mobility Global, down only slightly from 47.7% in 2024. Some of that drop was because automakers wound down the sale of imported vehicles with lower price tags, such as the Nissan Versa.

But there are too many costs and too much uncertainty for automakers to make widespread changes in their factory footprints.

“It’s a huge commitment (to build a factory) and to do it on a whim would be borderline crazy,” said Ivan Drury, director of insights at car buying site Edmunds. “So the safest action is no action. Continue on, even with that increased (tariff) cost.”

And one way that automakers keep costs down is under threat – the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement, or USMCA, the trade agreement reached during Trump’s first term.

That deal is now up for renegotiation, and Trump suggested last month he’d walk away from it if there weren’t substantial changes in favor of American companies. That terrifies automakers that have come to depend on parts being able to move freely across US borders with Canada and Mexico.

“We urge a swift and durable resolution that ensures a level playing field and provides long-term certainty needed for capital-intensive automotive investments,” said a statement from the American Automakers Policy Council, a trade group representing General Motors, Ford and Stellantis.

Tariffs are taking a bite into earnings. Toyota paid $8.4 billion in duties in its most recent fiscal year, swinging its North American results from a profit to loss. General Motors paid $3.1 billion in tariffs in 2025, and Ford paid $1 billion.

Which isn’t to say that the tariffs have been completely ineffective in incentivizing companies to move production back to the US. In addition to the Toyota Tacoma, last year General Motors said it would shift the assembly of two SUVS from Mexico. It will also stop importing a Buick SUV from China and will build a replacement model in the US.

But those vehicles will go to an existing plant in Kansas and another plant in Tennessee. Those facilities had room after GM cut back on massive investment into EV production after Trump and Republicans in Congress ended government support for electric vehicles.

For Toyota, there are also business reasons beyond trade policy to shift production to San Antonio, said Patrick Anderson, a Michigan economist and expert in the auto industry.

“Toyota has been very successful at growing its truck business in the United States, and their San Antonio production is already the mainstay of that in the United States,” he said. “So it makes natural business sense to consolidate existing operations.”

And even with tariffs as high as they are, it doesn’t make sense for automakers to shift production based on trade policies that can shift much faster than it takes to build a factory.

Experts say it would take the automakers years, and cost them billions, to build enough new US plants or expand existing ones to replace imported vehicles, especially when Trump’s successors can just as easily reverse his policies. Labor costs in the US are also higher than in Mexico and some other countries.

Demand is also strong – total vehicles sales rose 2% last year, even with record high car prices – which motivates automakers to keep imports flowing.

The-CNN-Wire
™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.

0:56

Judge sets deadlines as defense in Stafford County bus crash seeks discovery

Trump Media says Wall Street firms are paying up to $100K for early access to Trump posts

(CNN) — Wall Street has begun to embrace Trump Media and Technology Group’s newest product: instant access to President Donald Trump’s Truth Social posts.Truth Social owner Trump Media, in its first-ever earnings call with analysts Monday evening, said it has signed more than 10 customer agreements, mostly with high-frequency trading companies. Trump Media said those customers are willing to pay between $60,000 and $100,000 a month to gain access to the Truth Social data feed, known as an application programming interface (API). That direct link gives Wall Street a leg up over retail traders by delivering Truth Social posts split seconds faster than the public sees them.For high-frequency trading machines, milliseconds can mean serious money. Their algorithms look for signs that they should buy or sell, and by the time regular traders notice, it’s often too late to take advantage.Truth Social’s most-followed and important poster, Trump, often announces policy decisions on his company’s platform – sometimes even before his own administration is aware. Instant access to proclamations about tariff policy, national security and executive orders that affect the economy could send oil, bonds, stocks or other assets sharply higher or lower.Spending tens of thousands of dollars for speedy access to those market-moving announcements could be a no-brainer for high-frequency trading firms. And apparently, it’s a profitable venture for Trump and his social media company, too.“We recognized a modest amount of revenue from these agreements today,” said Kevin McGurn, interim CEO of Trump Media, on a conference call with analysts. “We believe this can grow into a meaningful, durable contributor.”McGurn announced that the company is in active conversations to grant Truth API access to news organizations and AI companies, including hyperscalers that provide huge amounts of computing powered by massive data centers and large language models.Last month, Democratic Sens. Elizabeth Warren and Adam Schiff urged federal regulators to investigate whether Trump Media’s plan to give Wall Street firms access to Trump’s Social Media posts is legal.The lawmakers described the plan as a “shocking abuse of the office of the President” and called for the Securities and Exchange Commission to determine if the arrangement violates federal securities law.“Early access to President Trump’s social media posts for Wall Street firms, wealthy insiders and high-frequency traders will erode investor confidence in basic fairness of the markets,” Warren and Schiff wrote in a letter to SEC Chair Paul Atkins.Small traffic, big lossesTrump Media launched in 2021 with ambitions of creating a conservative social media counterweight to Big Tech. However, five years later and despite Trump using Truth Social as his principal means of presidential communication, the platform remains a very tiny player that, by some measures, is getting even smaller.In July, Truth Social attracted just 261,300 daily active users, down 40% year over year, according to data shared with CNN by research firm Similarweb.Despite a modest decline in traffic, X (formerly Twitter) averaged 123.5 million daily active users in July – or nearly 500 times more than Truth Social.That small amount of traffic and minuscule advertising revenue led to just $1.7 million in sales last quarter – and a $238 million loss. That was significantly larger than the $20 million loss the company reported in the same quarter a year earlier.The company has never reported a quarterly profit.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story