Skip to main content

A look at Prince Harry’s various legal battles against the U.K. media

▶ Watch Video: Why Prince Harry isn’t staying at Buckingham Palace during U.K. visit

London — Britain’s Prince Harry lost his lawsuit against the publisher of the Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday tabloid newspapers on July 7, in what was widely expected to be the last of his courtroom battles against the U.K. media.

Below is a look at all the legal tussles with the press that King Charles III’s second son has taken part in:

Associated Newspaper Group

Harry, the Duke of Sussex, was among several claimants — including pop star Elton John and actor Elizabeth Hurley — accusing Associated Newspapers (ANL), the publisher of the popular Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday, of unlawfully gathering information about them through methods such as phone tapping, intercepting voicemails and impersonating people to obtain personal information.

Lawyers for Harry and the other claimants said the alleged acts took place between 1993 and 2011, but that the behavior continued as late as 2018.

ANL denied any wrongdoing, calling the allegations “preposterous,” and arguing the 50 or so articles involved in the lawsuit were based on legally-gather information.  

The U.K. High Court dismissed all the claims on July 7, saying they could not be proven.

All about Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex

All about Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex

56 photos

News Group Newspapers

Prince Harry launched legal proceedings against News Group Newspapers (NGN), which publishes The Sun and used to publish the now-defunct News of the World, in September 2019, accusing its journalists of unlawfully hacking his voicemails. The case was settled out of court in January 2025, lawyers for both sides said, with NGN offering a profuse apology and “substantial damages” to Harry and his co-claimant, a former senior U.K. lawmaker.   

NGN had argued the claims were brought too late and should have been thrown out under the U.K.’s six-year statute of limitations, but Harry argued the delay was due to a secret agreement between the publisher and the royal family, which NGN has denied the existence of.

The Duke of Sussex alleged that staff of the NGN papers had hacked his phone and used investigators and deception to unlawfully gather information on him dating back two decades.

Mirror Group Newspapers

Prince Harry’s lawsuit against Mirror Group Newspapers was settled in February 2024. Harry testified in court as part of that suit, claiming voicemail hacking and other illegal information gathering activities. It was the first time a senior member of Britain’s royal family had offered court testimony since the 19th century.

Ahead of the settlement, a judge had found that only 15 of the 33 articles initially scrutinized in the case had been the product of phone hacking or other illegal information gathering. He awarded Harry a “modest” sum, equivalent to about $180,000 in damages, as the case had shown the Mirror Group “only played a small part in everything that the Duke suffered” and “was not responsible for all the unlawful activity that was directed at the Duke, and that a good deal of the oppressive behavior of the Press towards the Duke over the years was not unlawful at all.”

“I consider that his phone was only hacked to a modest extent, and that this was probably carefully controlled by certain people at each newspaper,” the judge said. “There was a tendency for the Duke in his evidence to assume that everything published was the product of voicemail interception because phone hacking was rife within Mirror Group at the time. But phone hacking was not the only journalistic tool at the time, and his claims in relation to the other 18 articles did not stand up to careful analysis.”

The settlement that Harry received in February was in relation to claims on 115 more stories., CBS News partner network BBC News reported. The publishers agreed to cover his legal costs and pay the equivalent of an additional $370,000 in damages.

Separate ANL suit

Separately, Harry sued ANL for alleged libel over an article about his legal battle with the U.K. government regarding his security arrangements, but he dropped his claim early last year.

The article, published in the Daily Mail in February 2022, alleged Harry tried to keep his legal fight with the government a secret.

The prince also previously accepted an apology and damages from the same publisher over other articles in a separate libel lawsuit.

Republican senators release Fauci’s text messages discussing safety of Covid vaccine and pregnancy

(CNN) — Two Republican senators have released the first batch of text messages retrieved from Dr. Anthony Fauci’s former government phone as part of an investigation into his leadership and actions during the Covid-19 pandemic – including messages in which he discusses the possible risks and safety of the vaccine during pregnancy.Sens. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin and Rand Paul of Kentucky released the texts publicly online Monday, after the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) provided Fauci’s iPhone to a Senate subcommittee investigating him.The phone contained more than 34,000 messages and 522 voicemails, said the senators in a news release. They published screenshots showing a fraction of these – 11 texts sent during Fauci’s tenure as director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID).In one exchange on January 25, 2021, Dr. Vivek Murthy, then a member of President Joe Biden’s Covid advisory board, asked about any potential risk to those who are pregnant, or whether Fauci knew of any “data or theoretical reason why vaccinating early vs late in pregnancy would be preferred.”Fauci responded that there was “no data or theoretical reason to believe that vaccinating early versus later in pregnancy would be preferred.”Then he added: “Since many people have significant cytokines storm and fever after the 2nd dose, this theoretically could be associated with miscarriage in the 1st trimester.”Dr. Rochelle Walensky, then-director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), replied, “Definitely a good point, esp after dose two.”In another exchange a day later, according to the screenshots released, Fauci said that any vaccine with limited data on pregnancy should be carefully considered. “One must weigh the potential risks against the benefits,” he wrote, pointing out that a Covid infection could be “especially” serious in pregnancy.Though pregnant individuals were not included in vaccine trials, more than 10,000 had been vaccinated since the government issued an Emergency Use Authorization for the vaccine – and “no issues have arisen,” he wrote in a text.CNN has reached out to Fauci, Murthy and Walensky for comment.The CDC formally recommended on August 11, 2021, that pregnant people receive the vaccine after analyzing data and finding no increased risks of miscarriage or other safety concerns related to the shot.The CDC also warned during the pandemic that pregnant people were more likely to get severely ill compared to those who were not pregnant, according to an archived page from the agency’s website.Studies have since shown that the vaccines were safe during pregnancy, and that serious adverse reactions are rare. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists still recommends, as of this spring, that individuals who are pregnant or will be pregnant during the fall or winter should receive annual Covid-19 vaccines.In a news release, Johnson and Paul said their staff were reviewing the rest of the information on Fauci’s phone, and would publicly release them “as soon as possible.” The texts released on Monday “could have an immediate impact of public health and the principle of informed consent,” they said.The news release also listed several further public statements made by Fauci and other health officials in the months following the text exchange, recommending pregnant people receive Covid-19 vaccines.Battles on the HillPaul, who chairs the full Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, has long clashed with Fauci, who he subpoenaed in June to appear before Congress.He and other prominent Republicans accuse Fauci of covering up the origins of the pandemic, and of lying and misrepresenting data during the Covid-19 response – though they’ve yet to present clear evidence of such an alleged cover-up.Republican members of the Senate subcommittee voted last week to hold Fauci in contempt of Congress after he invoked the Fifth Amendment more than 100 times in a hearing, refusing to answer questions over concerns his responses would be used in an attempt to bring charges against him.Democrats pointed to the hearing as the latest example of Republicans spending years trying to deflect pandemic criticisms away from President Donald Trump and toward Fauci.“The campaign to vilify you, Dr. Fauci, is just one part of this larger campaign against science and facts — a campaign that has made Americans less safe,” said Sen. Richard Blumenthal, a Democrat from Connecticut.Ahead of that hearing, the committee also released more than 1,100 pages of Fauci’s personal diary from 2019 to 2022.Neither HHS nor Paul’s committee alerted Fauci ahead of time that they had obtained his diary and that they planned to publish it in full, according to a person familiar with the matter.The diary entries narrated Fauci’s growing concerns about Covid-19, frustrations with the government response and conflicting relationships with both Trump and Biden administration officials.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story