Skip to main content

Pentagon begins releasing UFO files: ‘It’s time the American people see’

▶ Watch Video: Trump tells public to “have fun” with UFO document release

Washington — The Pentagon on Friday began releasing more files related to UFOs and UAPs, following through on an order from President Trump to make public government documents about unexplained phenomena.

The release, posted on a new Pentagon “UFO” website, includes 162 files from the FBI, Department of Defense, NASA and State Department. The documents contain eyewitness testimony, photos and reports of sightings of unexplained objects, detailing incidents dating back decades from around the globe. 

“These files, hidden behind classifications, have long fueled justified speculation — and it’s time the American people see it for themselves,” Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said in a statement.

The president said the disclosure was aimed at providing “Complete and Maximum Transparency.”

“Whereas previous Administrations have failed to be transparent on this subject, with these new Documents and Videos, the people can decide for themselves, ‘WHAT THE HELL IS GOING ON?'” Mr. Trump wrote on Truth Social. “Have Fun and Enjoy!”

Photos and videos from the UFO files

Friday’s release included 120 PDFs, 28 videos and 14 image files. Other photos are contained in PDF documents. The images are mostly still pictures from footage of suspicious objects filmed by military aircraft.

Six of the photos show phenomena observed by NASA astronauts during the Apollo 12 and Apollo 17 missions, captured in photographs taken from the surface of the moon:

An archival photo taken on the Moon by Apollo 12 astronauts in 1969.
An archival photo taken on the Moon by Apollo 12 astronauts in 1969.

NASA/Pentagon

An archival photo taken on the Moon by Apollo 12 astronauts in 1969, overlaid with boxes showing "areas of interest."
An archival photo taken on the Moon by Apollo 12 astronauts in 1969, overlaid with boxes showing “areas of interest.”

NASA/Pentagon

One Apollo 17 photo, from December 1972, is described as depicting “three ‘dots’ in a triangular formation” in the lunar sky. The Pentagon said the photo had been released previously, but the military and NASA are completing a new review of the original film to try to explain what it shows.

“While this photo has been previously released and discussed by keen observers, there is no consensus about the nature of the anomaly. New preliminary US government analysis suggests the image feature is potentially the result of a physical object in the scene,” the Pentagon caption said. 

NASA photograph from the Apollo 17 mission showing dots in the sky
The Pentagon’s UFO files included this NASA photograph from the Apollo 17 mission, taken in December 1972, described as containing “three ‘dots’ in a triangular formation” in the lunar sky.

NASA/Pentagon

Another document says Apollo 17 astronaut Jack Schmitt reported seeing “a flash on the lunar surface north of Grimaldi (crater).”

The roughly two dozen videos, which run for a total of 41 minutes, show reported encounters around the world between 2020 and 2026.

Most show footage from an infrared camera tracking a white object that appears as a speck on the screen moving through the air. The report that accompanied a video taken in Greece in 2023 said the object was making multiple “90-degree turns” at approximately 80 miles per hour. 

One of the videos shows an object described as resembling a football in the Indo-Pacific and another from Syria shows two semi-transparent, irregularly shaped orange areas that each appear for two seconds. 

Watch videos of possible UFOs from first batch of files released by Pentagon

41:31

Another image is an FBI photo overlaid by a graphic of an object described by an eyewitness. The composite sketch shows an “apparent ellipsoid bronze metallic object materializing out of a bright light in the sky, 130-195 feet in length, and disappearing instantaneously.” 

An FBI photo with a sketch of an object described by an eyewitness.
An FBI photo with a sketch of an object described by an eyewitness.

FBI/Pentagon

The documents in the UFO files

The release also includes the FBI’s case file detailing reports of unidentified objects and “flying discs” from 1947 to 1968. Spanning 18 separate documents, the case file features “high-profile incident accounts, photographic evidence from sites like Oak Ridge, TN, and technical proposals regarding potential propulsion systems,” according to the Defense Department’s summary.

The Pentagon said the FBI has previously released portions of the case file, known as 62-HQ-83894, but Friday’s version includes fewer redactions and “several newly declassified pages.”

The bulk of the documents feature modern incident reports from members of the military detailing their encounters with strange objects or unexplained phenomena in Iraq, Syria, the Persian Gulf, Strait of Hormuz, Gulf of Aden, Greece and elsewhere. One pilot described seeing a “triangular and metallic UAP” flying at 25,000 ft. over the Mediterranean.

Other documents detail historical encounters, including the famous crash in Roswell, New Mexico, in 1947. One section of the FBI case file includes a memo written by an agent in the bureau’s Dallas field office to FBI headquarters. The agent reports that a major in the Air Force called to tell the office “that an object purporting to be a flying disc was recovered near Roswell, New Mexico.”

“The disc is hexagonal in shape and was suspended from a ball[o]on by cable, which ball[o]on was approximately twenty feet in diameter,” the memo said.

There are also letters addressed to FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover detailing “flying disc” sightings, and correspondence between different FBI offices about the reports. After one sighting in Idaho, the regional office wrote to headquarters asking if there was any advice on how to explain the phenomena because “it is believed continued appearance of such objects without official explanation may result in hysteria, or panic.”

A more recent document detailed the experience of several federal law enforcement agents in an undisclosed location in the western U.S. in 2023. The file, prepared by the Pentagon, reported that teams of agents had seen various orbs and strange figures in the sky or just off the ground. 

One incident involved an orb that the agents described as “similar to the Eye [of] Sauron from Lord of the Rings, except without the pupil, or maybe an orange Storm Electrify bowling ball.” 

orb.jpg
A report from the Pentagon on federal employees reporting seeing an orb resembling the “Eye of Sauron” in 2023.

Pentagon

Another incident involved agents seeing “orange ‘orbs’ in the sky” that emitted “smaller red ‘orbs’ in groups of two to four.”

“These events were witnessed by multiple teams from varying locations and vantage points over a two-day period,” the file said. “Due to the sequential nature of the events, it is not known whether there was a single orange ‘mother’ orb that released the groups of red orbs or whether there were multiple orange orbs at play.”

The State Department’s files feature cables from diplomats in Papua New Guinea, Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, Georgia and Mexico to Washington, detailing various UAP incidents in those countries. The dates range from 1985 to late 2025.

A cable from the U.S. Embassy in Tajikistan in 1994 relayed the experience of a commercial air pilot and crew who reported seeing a strange object at 41,000 feet. The group said they saw “a bright light of enormous intensity, approaching them from over the horizon to the east at a great rate of speed and at a much higher altitude than their own.” The crew watched as the object “maneuvered in circles, corkscrews and made 90-degree turns at rapid rates of speed and under very high G’s.”

“To our suggestion that the object might have been a meteor entering and skipping off the earth’s atmosphere, [the crew was] adamant that they had seen thousands of ‘falling stars’ and other space junk entering the atmosphere in their years of flying passenger aircraft for PanAm,” the diplomat wrote. “This, they insisted, was nothing like a meteor.”

The pilot “expressed the opinion, which his crew seemed to support, that the object was extraterrestrial and under intelligent control.” The embassy diplomat concluded: “We have no opinion and report the above for what it may be worth.”

The Pentagon said the materials released Friday detail “unresolved cases, meaning the government is unable to make a definitive determination on the nature of the observed phenomena.” The department welcomed analysis from the private sector. 

Out of the 162 files, 108 contain redactions. The Pentagon said information was withheld to “protect the identity of eyewitnesses, the location of government facilities, or potentially sensitive information about military sites not related to UAP.”

“No redactions have been made to any files released under President Trump’s directive concerning information about the nature or existence of any encounter reported as a UAP or related phenomena,” the statement said.

More releases coming

The Pentagon’s UFO site said new documents will be released on a rolling basis “as they are discovered and declassified, with tranches posted every few weeks.”

In February, Mr. Trump, in a post on Truth Social, directed the Pentagon and other agency heads to release files on UFOs and any “alien and extraterrestrial life.” 

He asked them “to begin the process of identifying and releasing” any relevant files and called for the release of “any and all other information connected to these highly complex, but extremely interesting and important, matters.” 

The Pentagon has tracked reports of what it calls unidentified aerial phenomena, or UAPs, for decades. But the military said in a 2024 report there’s no evidence that any government investigation into UAPs has confirmed the existence of extraterrestrial life. Mr. Trump has said he’s not sure whether or not aliens exist.

The Pentagon started releasing images several years ago after it established a website for its All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office, which was tasked with analyzing reports of unidentified anomalous phenomena. The AARO website was established in 2023. 

Doctor convicted of attempted manslaughter of his wife wants a new trial, saying jurors may have been confused

(CNN) — Along the steep Pali Puka trail last spring, the verdant beauty of Oahu spilled out to the Pacific Ocean from the scenic path where Gerhardt and Arielle Konig stood. On that high ridge, they fought for their lives – emotionally, then physically – each later would testify.A trip intended to celebrate Arielle’s birthday – and maybe salvage their troubled marriage – ended with the couple, who share two young children, on the ground attacking each other. He bashed her in the face with a rock. She bit him and squeezed his testicles.Who started the melee became the question at the heart of an attempted second-degree murder charge filed against Gerhardt Konig.Prosecutors said the defendant wanted to kill his spouse and tried to push her off the cliff. But after an emotional, 10-day trial a year later that saw husband, wife and one of Gerhardt Konig’s children from a prior marriage on the stand, the jury found him guilty of the lesser charge of attempted manslaughter.At Konig’s request, a judge on Friday heard arguments on whether a new jury should hear the case because of what two jurors in news interviews revealed soon after issuing the verdict that could send Konig to prison for up to 20 years, along with concern one juror may have communicated about the case outside the jury room during deliberations.“Jury irregularities call into serious question the integrity of this verdict,” defense attorney Thomas Otake wrote in an appeal filed in May.At Friday’s hearing, Judge Paul Wong said the court would question jurors about any outside communications during deliberations before deciding whether to grant a new trial. The court will revisit the matter on September 11.“The court must ascertain the extent of the influence,” Wong said.Whether defendant intended to kill is at issueFinding insufficient evidence to convict Konig of attempted murder, the jury found him guilty of attempted manslaughter, with his actions – even if extremely dangerous – motivated by “extreme mental or emotional disturbance.”Ruling out an attempted murder charge was a relief to Konig’s legal team and left open the possibility Konig could be sentenced to probation, with no jail time at all.“We are thankful that they did not convict him of attempted murder, which would have been life in prison,” Otake told reporters shortly after the verdict was announced.Still, the defense attorney immediately promised an appeal based on unspecified concerns about the judge’s rulings during the trial. When his motion dropped a month later, however, it wasn’t the judge Otake took issue with:The request for a new trial was based on what jurors said after the verdict.“Somebody was definitely hurt; it was a bodily injury to the head that could result in serious bodily injury,” foreperson Makalapua Atkins told CNN affiliate East Idaho News about jurors’ state of mind in deliberations.“The intent to kill is improbable to us based on the evidence presented,” Atkins said in an interview after the verdict with True Crime AZ, adding, “The only people who know what happened on that cliff are the two that were involved.”But under Hawaii law, Konig’s defense team has argued, even a conviction for attempted manslaughter would require the jury to find the defendant was trying to kill the victim – and the foreperson said they didn’t.“The jury did not unanimously believe that Dr. Konig had an intent to kill his wife,” Atkins confirmed in a sworn statement to the defense attorney accompanying his appeal. Prosecutors also asked Atkins to sit down with them for an interview, but she declined, their response to the request for appeal states. CNN could not reach Atkins for comment.Another juror, identified publicly only as Juror #3, also said he had not been convinced Gerhardt Konig intended to take Arielle’s life that day.“I don’t know if he was trying to kill his wife, personally,” he told Honolulu TV station KHON in an on-camera interview. “I do know that it was the capacity to kill his wife, personally. That how I felt about it.”If jurors didn’t understand what was required for conviction, Konig’s attorneys argued, it opens the door to a new trial.“Conduct that could result in death or has the capacity to kill may be reckless, but it is not necessarily intentional, and Hawaiʻi does not recognize attempted reckless manslaughter,” Konig’s defense attorneys said, with the emphasis, in a court filing.Did the jury understand the law?“The jurors’ public remarks raise a serious concern that the verdict may rest upon findings inconsistent with the convicted offense,” Konig’s defense attorneys said in a motion for a new trial.The judge’s instructions – 33 in all – were a lot to digest. They laid out a menu of five possible charges – from second-degree attempted murder to third-degree assault – explaining the order in which they had to be considered and steps to evaluating each.“If and only if you unanimously find that all the elements of Attempted Murder in the Second Degree have been proven by the prosecution beyond a reasonable doubt, and you unanimously find that the defendant was not acting in Self-Defense, then you must consider the affirmative defense of Extreme Mental or Emotional Disturbance,” one instruction states.In their response to Konig’s request for a new trial, prosecutors did not try to rebut the claim jurors were confused, instead saying it doesn’t matter. The “internal thought process” of the jury, even when revealed voluntarily by jurors, should not be reconsidered by the court after a verdict, prosecutor Joel Garner stated.“Jurors can change their mind, but what matters is whether the verdict was unanimous at the time it was rendered,” the prosecution wrote. “In this case it was, even according to the on-the-record statements of the foreperson – and therefore a later declaration disagreeing with the verdicts is not a sufficient basis to grant a motion for a new trial.”Juror may have revealed their discussions during deliberationKonig’s defense also raises another concern about the jury: that one member may have been communicating about the case to an outsider while deliberations were still underway.“I’ve been texting with one of the juror’s (sic) and they’re going for count 3 attempted manslaughter,” says a message posted to the live chat of trial coverage by the Law&Crime Network.The comment was first spotted by someone – whose name is redacted in the court filing – and emailed to prosecutors, who alerted the judge.“What caught my attention is that this commenter specifically predicted the verdict – that Konig would be convicted of attempted manslaughter – before it was announced,” the person wrote in the email.Whether it was legitimate or a hoax has not been proven, but Konig’s defense attorneys say the fact that it correctly foreshadowed the verdict should give it credibility.“Although the full scope of any such communication remains unknown, these circumstances raise substantial concerns regarding the jury’s exposure to outside influence or extraneous information during deliberations,” the defense team wrote.Prosecutors say even if the comment was authentic, it doesn’t require a new trial unless there is proof that “external influence” swayed the decision of the juror.“A juror disclosing where the jury stands is certainly problematic, but on its own it does not indicate that the other party influenced that juror in any way,” Garner said in their court filing.Could a new trial backfire?If Konig, who is in jail pending his sentencing, is granted a new trial, it could come with a big risk: He could face the attempted murder charge again after beating it in his first trial.Otake is trying to make sure that doesn’t happen.“The jury did not convict Dr. Konig of attempted murder in the second degree,” the defense lawyer wrote, arguing the conviction on the lesser charge amounts to an attempted murder acquittal since the jury could not convict Konig of both.“Any retrial must therefore be limited to offenses consistent with the jury’s verdict and the constitutional protections against double jeopardy,” Otake added.The Department of the Prosecuting Attorney in Honolulu has not said whether it would try to pursue an attempted murder conviction again if a retrial is ordered.Either way, the legal fight between Gerhardt and Arielle Konig will continue, as their divorce is still pending.“The marriage,” Arielle Konig wrote in her divorce petition, “is irretrievably broken.”The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story