Skip to main content

Is a Joint Mortgage Right for You? How One Spouse’s Credit Could Cost You Thousands

Newly married couples may envision starting life together in a new house — one they both own. That’s a decision that can also make smart financial sense.

“I feel homeownership and real estate are a valuable cornerstone of building wealth,” says Kathy Costas, vice president and advisor with EP Wealth Advisors in Westlake Village, California.

However, not every couple should jump into homeownership right away. Newlyweds with significant debt and low credit scores or those who think they might move again soon may want to defer purchasing a home.

When Should Married Couples Buy a House?

There is no hard-and-fast rule about when to buy a home. Some couples may want to pay off student loans or wedding debt before taking on a mortgage, while others may feel comfortable adding a house payment on their income.

“It’s unique to each and every couple,” says Carolyn Morganbesser, assistant vice president of mortgage originations for Affinity Federal Credit Union in Basking Ridge, New Jersey.

For those who want to buy a house, purchasing one sooner rather than later can have benefits.

“Buyers can get today’s prices before homes in their market appreciate, and savings can be invested into a home that appreciates,” writes Jeff Taylor, founder and managing director of Miami-based mortgage solutions provider Mphasis Digital Risk, in an email. Couples with a high debt-to-income ratio may not qualify for a loan, though, according to Taylor.

Couples should also consider how long they plan to live in the home. “You don’t have to die there, but (live there) at least five years,” Costas says.

Anything less, and you aren’t likely to come out ahead financially when you factor in closing and moving costs. Plus, if you own the home for less than 24 months, you could end up paying capital gains tax on the entire appreciated amount when you sell.

“Homeownership isn’t a great investment,” says Russell Hackmann, president of Hackmann Wealth Advisors in Boston.

He acknowledges that’s not a popular opinion, but he thinks homeownership typically makes sense only for those who plan to remain in one place for 10 to 20 years.

A final consideration for couples is the cost of homeowner association fees, utilities and property maintenance, according to Costas. Mortgages aren’t as cheap as they used to be and when all these other expenses are factored in, homeownership may no longer fit in a new couple’s budget.

“We have an unusual situation with interest rates where it can actually be cheaper to rent,” Costas says.

[See: Best Mortgage Lenders for First-Time Homebuyers]

The ‘Low Middle’ Rule: How Your Spouse’s Credit Score Could Tank Your Rate

A person’s credit score is used to determine their mortgage terms and interest rate. With a joint mortgage, there are two people’s credit scores to consider.

“We’re going to use the low middle,” according to Morganbesser. In other words, lenders look at credit scores from all three major credit reporting companies — Equifax, Experian and TransUnion — and then base the loan terms on the middle number of the person with the lower scores. “That’s going to affect your interest rate, which is going to affect your buying power,” she says.

“If the lower score removes viable loan options or sharply increases rates, lenders can advise on whether rapid credit score improvements are possible based on each borrower’s credit report history,” Taylor says.

In some situations, that may not be possible and couples are left with two options: Accept a higher interest rate on the loan or get a mortgage in the name of one spouse only.

Buying Solo: When It’s Smarter to Leave One Spouse Off the Mortgage

Married couples don’t have to get a joint mortgage. “They can do the mortgage in one name, but they can both be on the deed,” Morganbesser says.

If you get a mortgage in the name of only one spouse, their credit score alone will determine the interest rate. The downside is that only their income can be used to qualify for the loan.

“Maybe, single, you get a better rate, but maybe together you can buy more (house),” Costas says.

Either way, should the marriage dissolve, couples in community property states will split the home 50/50 during a divorce, according to Costas. The property will likely be considered a marital asset in other states, she says, but its value may not be split evenly there.

“For married people, it’s nice to own and buy in both people’s names,” Hackmann says. Still, “If one person has disastrous credit, then the home purchase might need to be in the other person’s name alone.”

Buying Before the Big Day: The Risks of Purchasing While Engaged

There’s no need to wait until after the wedding to buy a house. Property can be purchased as joint tenants with each person listed on the title and mortgage. Going that route does come with a risk, though.

“I’ve seen people who are engaged and want to purchase before the wedding and then there is no wedding,” Morganbesser says.

If a relationship sours, owning a house together can make an unhappy situation worse. “That can be an unpleasant thing to unwind,” Hackmann says.

However, assuming you live happily ever after, purchasing a property while engaged is similar to buying one after the wedding. You may need to update a name on the mortgage and title afterward, but that typically isn’t a complex or involved process.

More from U.S. News

What a Recession Would Mean for Mortgage Rates in 2026

Kevin Warsh Set to Lead the Fed: Why a Trump-Backed Chair Doesn’t Guarantee Lower Mortgage Rates

Mortgage Rates on the Decline: Should You Refinance in 2026?

Is a Joint Mortgage Right for You? How One Spouse’s Credit Could Cost You Thousands originally appeared on usnews.com

Republican senators release Fauci’s text messages discussing safety of Covid vaccine and pregnancy

(CNN) — Two Republican senators have released the first batch of text messages retrieved from Dr. Anthony Fauci’s former government phone as part of an investigation into his leadership and actions during the Covid-19 pandemic – including messages in which he discusses the possible risks and safety of the vaccine during pregnancy.Sens. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin and Rand Paul of Kentucky released the texts publicly online Monday, after the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) provided Fauci’s iPhone to a Senate subcommittee investigating him.The phone contained more than 34,000 messages and 522 voicemails, said the senators in a news release. They published screenshots showing a fraction of these – 11 texts sent during Fauci’s tenure as director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID).In one exchange on January 25, 2021, Dr. Vivek Murthy, then a member of President Joe Biden’s Covid advisory board, asked about any potential risk to those who are pregnant, or whether Fauci knew of any “data or theoretical reason why vaccinating early vs late in pregnancy would be preferred.”Fauci responded that there was “no data or theoretical reason to believe that vaccinating early versus later in pregnancy would be preferred.”Then he added: “Since many people have significant cytokines storm and fever after the 2nd dose, this theoretically could be associated with miscarriage in the 1st trimester.”Dr. Rochelle Walensky, then-director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), replied, “Definitely a good point, esp after dose two.”In another exchange a day later, according to the screenshots released, Fauci said that any vaccine with limited data on pregnancy should be carefully considered. “One must weigh the potential risks against the benefits,” he wrote, pointing out that a Covid infection could be “especially” serious in pregnancy.Though pregnant individuals were not included in vaccine trials, more than 10,000 had been vaccinated since the government issued an Emergency Use Authorization for the vaccine – and “no issues have arisen,” he wrote in a text.CNN has reached out to Fauci, Murthy and Walensky for comment.The CDC formally recommended on August 11, 2021, that pregnant people receive the vaccine after analyzing data and finding no increased risks of miscarriage or other safety concerns related to the shot.The CDC also warned during the pandemic that pregnant people were more likely to get severely ill compared to those who were not pregnant, according to an archived page from the agency’s website.Studies have since shown that the vaccines were safe during pregnancy, and that serious adverse reactions are rare. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists still recommends, as of this spring, that individuals who are pregnant or will be pregnant during the fall or winter should receive annual Covid-19 vaccines.In a news release, Johnson and Paul said their staff were reviewing the rest of the information on Fauci’s phone, and would publicly release them “as soon as possible.” The texts released on Monday “could have an immediate impact of public health and the principle of informed consent,” they said.The news release also listed several further public statements made by Fauci and other health officials in the months following the text exchange, recommending pregnant people receive Covid-19 vaccines.Battles on the HillPaul, who chairs the full Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, has long clashed with Fauci, who he subpoenaed in June to appear before Congress.He and other prominent Republicans accuse Fauci of covering up the origins of the pandemic, and of lying and misrepresenting data during the Covid-19 response – though they’ve yet to present clear evidence of such an alleged cover-up.Republican members of the Senate subcommittee voted last week to hold Fauci in contempt of Congress after he invoked the Fifth Amendment more than 100 times in a hearing, refusing to answer questions over concerns his responses would be used in an attempt to bring charges against him.Democrats pointed to the hearing as the latest example of Republicans spending years trying to deflect pandemic criticisms away from President Donald Trump and toward Fauci.“The campaign to vilify you, Dr. Fauci, is just one part of this larger campaign against science and facts — a campaign that has made Americans less safe,” said Sen. Richard Blumenthal, a Democrat from Connecticut.Ahead of that hearing, the committee also released more than 1,100 pages of Fauci’s personal diary from 2019 to 2022.Neither HHS nor Paul’s committee alerted Fauci ahead of time that they had obtained his diary and that they planned to publish it in full, according to a person familiar with the matter.The diary entries narrated Fauci’s growing concerns about Covid-19, frustrations with the government response and conflicting relationships with both Trump and Biden administration officials.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story