Skip to main content

How to Show You’re Committed to Law School

As law schools put more emphasis on career outcomes, they value applicants who are highly motivated to put in the work it takes to do well in a competitive job market. They don’t want students who see law school as a fallback option, a feather in their cap or a way to put off life choices.

Committed law students tend to perform well in law school and contribute actively to the campus community. And they are more likely to graduate into engaged, successful and generous alumni.

But how can a law school distinguish a dedicated but modest applicant from one who is masking their hesitations?

Here are four tips for communicating commitment to a legal career in law school application essays:

— Adopt a professional tone.

— Avoid cliches.

— Explain your path.

— Don’t dwell on your insecurities.

Adopt a Professional Tone

As an applicant, it is crucial to strike the right tone in your essays and communications with admissions officers.

[Read: 5 Personal Qualities That Law School Applicants Should Have]

You want to sound upbeat and excited about law school and to convey your specific interest in a target school. But leaning too heavily into your enthusiasm can sound immature or anxious.

Instead, aim for a professional tone. Write concisely and substantively to show your conviction and confidence in your chosen career path.

Avoid Cliches

Perhaps you’ve always known you wanted to be a lawyer. Even as a kid you argued over everything and binge-watched legal dramas. While these childhood memories may be meaningful to you, they say little to admissions officers.

Not only are these common cliches, but they may make your expectations of legal practice seem cartoonish. Will you feel lost or disappointed if your law school classes don’t involve dramatic courtroom arguments?

Rather than detail your early inclinations in your law school application, focus on the trajectory of your interest in law in your adult life and where you see it taking you.

[Read: Questions to Ask Before Heading to Law School]

Explain Your Path

Your personal statement should do more than communicate why you are applying to law school. Rather than elaborate on how much you want to be a lawyer, demonstrate how your past experiences set you up for success in law school.

When you talk about the jobs, classes, extracurricular activities or other impactful experiences, your passion should come through naturally.

Connect the dots between your background, law school and career goals. This will send a clear signal to law school admissions officers that you have thought through your future and how law school will prepare you for it. That way, even when the going gets tough, you have a reason to stay committed.

[Read: 7 Things I Wish I Knew When I Applied to Law School]

Don’t Dwell on Your Insecurities

It’s common for applicants to compare themselves to some imagined ideal of a typical applicant. Few applicants take a straight path to law school, so there’s no need to overexplain your own meanders.

Even if you’re an older applicant or career-switcher, avoid sounding defensive or apologetic about your missteps. Focus instead on how your past experiences will complement your legal degree.

Law schools don’t expect you to have your whole life mapped out. They just expect you to know what you’re getting into. A law school that looks for committed students is one that is motivated to invest in your future.

More from U.S. News

How to Become a Lawyer: A Step-by-Step Guide

How Long Is Law School and What Is it Like?

How Law School Financial Aid Works: What to Know

How to Show You’re Committed to Law School originally appeared on usnews.com

Republican senators release Fauci’s text messages discussing safety of Covid vaccine and pregnancy

(CNN) — Two Republican senators have released the first batch of text messages retrieved from Dr. Anthony Fauci’s former government phone as part of an investigation into his leadership and actions during the Covid-19 pandemic – including messages in which he discusses the possible risks and safety of the vaccine during pregnancy.Sens. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin and Rand Paul of Kentucky released the texts publicly online Monday, after the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) provided Fauci’s iPhone to a Senate subcommittee investigating him.The phone contained more than 34,000 messages and 522 voicemails, said the senators in a news release. They published screenshots showing a fraction of these – 11 texts sent during Fauci’s tenure as director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID).In one exchange on January 25, 2021, Dr. Vivek Murthy, then a member of President Joe Biden’s Covid advisory board, asked about any potential risk to those who are pregnant, or whether Fauci knew of any “data or theoretical reason why vaccinating early vs late in pregnancy would be preferred.”Fauci responded that there was “no data or theoretical reason to believe that vaccinating early versus later in pregnancy would be preferred.”Then he added: “Since many people have significant cytokines storm and fever after the 2nd dose, this theoretically could be associated with miscarriage in the 1st trimester.”Dr. Rochelle Walensky, then-director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), replied, “Definitely a good point, esp after dose two.”In another exchange a day later, according to the screenshots released, Fauci said that any vaccine with limited data on pregnancy should be carefully considered. “One must weigh the potential risks against the benefits,” he wrote, pointing out that a Covid infection could be “especially” serious in pregnancy.Though pregnant individuals were not included in vaccine trials, more than 10,000 had been vaccinated since the government issued an Emergency Use Authorization for the vaccine – and “no issues have arisen,” he wrote in a text.CNN has reached out to Fauci, Murthy and Walensky for comment.The CDC formally recommended on August 11, 2021, that pregnant people receive the vaccine after analyzing data and finding no increased risks of miscarriage or other safety concerns related to the shot.The CDC also warned during the pandemic that pregnant people were more likely to get severely ill compared to those who were not pregnant, according to an archived page from the agency’s website.Studies have since shown that the vaccines were safe during pregnancy, and that serious adverse reactions are rare. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists still recommends, as of this spring, that individuals who are pregnant or will be pregnant during the fall or winter should receive annual Covid-19 vaccines.In a news release, Johnson and Paul said their staff were reviewing the rest of the information on Fauci’s phone, and would publicly release them “as soon as possible.” The texts released on Monday “could have an immediate impact of public health and the principle of informed consent,” they said.The news release also listed several further public statements made by Fauci and other health officials in the months following the text exchange, recommending pregnant people receive Covid-19 vaccines.Battles on the HillPaul, who chairs the full Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, has long clashed with Fauci, who he subpoenaed in June to appear before Congress.He and other prominent Republicans accuse Fauci of covering up the origins of the pandemic, and of lying and misrepresenting data during the Covid-19 response – though they’ve yet to present clear evidence of such an alleged cover-up.Republican members of the Senate subcommittee voted last week to hold Fauci in contempt of Congress after he invoked the Fifth Amendment more than 100 times in a hearing, refusing to answer questions over concerns his responses would be used in an attempt to bring charges against him.Democrats pointed to the hearing as the latest example of Republicans spending years trying to deflect pandemic criticisms away from President Donald Trump and toward Fauci.“The campaign to vilify you, Dr. Fauci, is just one part of this larger campaign against science and facts — a campaign that has made Americans less safe,” said Sen. Richard Blumenthal, a Democrat from Connecticut.Ahead of that hearing, the committee also released more than 1,100 pages of Fauci’s personal diary from 2019 to 2022.Neither HHS nor Paul’s committee alerted Fauci ahead of time that they had obtained his diary and that they planned to publish it in full, according to a person familiar with the matter.The diary entries narrated Fauci’s growing concerns about Covid-19, frustrations with the government response and conflicting relationships with both Trump and Biden administration officials.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story