Skip to main content

As Trump Moves Student Loans to Treasury, What Does This Mean for You?

Sweeping changes are coming to federal student loans this summer, impacting everything from how much you can borrow to how you’ll repay it. In many cases, borrowers now have enough details to at least roughly estimate how the new rules may affect their finances and their education.

But one transition still has borrowers and experts guessing as to how it will unfold and what impact it may have.

The Trump administration is in the initial stages of transferring millions of student loans from the Education Department to the Treasury Department. The phased transfer will ultimately result in the full handoff of the nearly $1.7 trillion federal student loan portfolio to a new agency.

If the shift goes smoothly, it’s possible that many borrowers will hardly notice. The switch doesn’t materially affect what loans borrowers receive or their monthly payments.

But experts expect the move could have a major impact on some borrowers, particularly those who are in default or struggling to make payments. It could also have a downstream effect on others. Some question whether a diminished Education Department can successfully juggle yet another major task alongside the launch of new repayment plans and the pending transition of millions of people out of the SAVE repayment plan.

“Anytime you see a big operational shift within federal student aid, that has the potential to have a significant impact on borrowers,” says Kyra Taylor, a staff attorney at the National Consumer Law Center who focuses on student loans.

[Read: Best Private Student Loans.]

Why Trump Is Shifting Student Loans to Treasury

By moving the student loan portfolio to Treasury, the Trump administration aims to accomplish two of its top goals.

First, the administration wants to get more borrowers paying off their loans, with an eye toward shaving off some of the overall outstanding loan balance. Second, the move relieves the Education Department of one of its key duties, further weakening an agency the administration has said it wants to dismantle.

Of the roughly 43 million Americans who have student loan debt, about 9 million are in default.

“Treasury has the unique experience, the operational capability, and the financial expertise to bring long overdue financial discipline to the program and be better stewards of taxpayer dollars,” said Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent in a statement when the shift was announced in March.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., blasted the plan, saying officials at both departments have failed to provide details about the timing, costs and purpose of the move.

“The Trump administration has no explanation for how this latest attempt to dismantle the Education Department is helping anyone — because it isn’t,” said Warren in a May 4 statement after releasing letters she received from both departments in response to her request for additional details.

The transfer will occur in phases, although the administration hasn’t laid out a specific timeline for when each phase will take place. Treasury will first take over management and collections of defaulted student loan accounts before eventually assuming control of all accounts. The administration has also said Treasury will provide “operational support” for other student aid functions, although it isn’t clear what that might entail.

The departments have already begun the early stages of the first phase of the transfer, wrote Mason Champion, Treasury assistant secretary, in a response letter to Warren.

At least seven Department of Education employees will be assigned to the Treasury Department to help implement the transfer, Champion said.

[Read: Best Student Loan Refinance Lenders.]

How the Shift Could Affect You

Questions and uncertainty remain, but here are a few possibilities borrowers should watch for.

More Aggressive Collections

The federal government has several tools it can use to collect defaulted student loan debts, although the sharper instruments — garnishing wages and seizing tax refunds — have remained shelved for about six years, since they were paused as a pandemic-relief measure.

The Trump administration has suggested it wants to restart both and even announced that it was sending warning notices to defaulted borrowers in January before pulling back on that plan, saying it would instead delay the move to give people more time to evaluate their new repayment options.

But experts say they expect the Treasury Department to once again use those collections methods.

When a borrower defaults on a student loan, the government has the authority to seize up to 15% of their after-tax wages. This wage garnishment can continue until the debt is paid in full or the default is resolved. Borrowers must be notified 30 days before garnishment starts, and this notice includes options for resolving the default status and instructions for requesting a hearing to dispute the action.

A borrower will also receive a notice if the government plans to withhold their tax refund — known as Treasury offset — to collect on debt. After the notice, the borrower will have 65 days to either pay off the debt or take one of several steps, such as entering into rehabilitation or working out a new repayment agreement.

[Read: Best Student Loans for Graduate School]

Confusion for Borrowers

Many student loan borrowers are already heading into the summer of 2026 trying to make sense of a dizzying number of changes to the federal program.

“Adding one more element of change just adds in more chaos and confusion and complexity for borrowers,” says Taylor.

But observers worry that those borrowers might end up dealing with a new agency that isn’t as well-versed in the options available to student loan borrowers and the rights those borrowers have.

“Student loans are very different than any other kind of debt that the Treasury Department could collect on behalf of the federal government,” says Aissa Canchola Bañez, policy director at the advocacy group Protect Borrowers. “There are a lot of benefits and protections that a student loan borrower has that other folks who might have other debts do not have.”

She says those protections include debt forgiveness options and loan rehabilitation. Students are also protected if they were defrauded by their school or had a disability impact their earnings.

“At the end of the day, the Treasury is the federal government’s debt collector, and they care about collecting debt regardless of whether or not somebody might be eligible for other types of protections or cancellation,” says Canchola Bañez.

Potential Delays and Errors

The Education Department and its loan servicers are juggling multiple major changes at the same time.

For example, after a court ruling put an end to the Biden-era SAVE repayment plan, 7 million borrowers will now need to move to new plans within a 90-day window this summer. Loans in that plan have been in forbearance as the court case progressed, and many of those borrowers haven’t made a payment in years.

The new Repayment Assistance Plan, the Trump administration’s income-driven repayment plan, is scheduled to launch on July 1, the same day that various additional changes to student loans also go into effect.

Adding the transfer of nearly 43 million student loan accounts could lead to delays or errors that could impact some borrowers, experts say.

These changes will need to be ushered in by a shrinking Education Department, which saw its staff cut nearly in half in 2025. The Federal Student Aid office was reduced from 1,433 employees to 777.

“Even with the simplest transfers of loan accounts between two servicers, we’ve found hiccups and errors that occur,” says Canchola Bañez. “It’s a massive portfolio, and there are millions of borrowers that are part of this.”

More from U.S. News

Will You Be Disqualified From Public Service Loan Forgiveness Thanks to ‘Illegal’ Activities?

Undergrad Loan Limits Haven’t Risen Since 2008. Why Not?

This Type of Borrower Gets the Lowest Rate on a Private Student Loan

As Trump Moves Student Loans to Treasury, What Does This Mean for You? originally appeared on usnews.com

Deputy followed her six miles, then threw her to the ground: Sun Prairie family alleges racial profiling, excessive force

Click here for updates on this story    SUN PRAIRIE, WI (365 Media Foundation, Inc) -- A Sun Prairie family has filed complaints with the Dane County Sheriff’s Office (DCSO) and Sun Prairie Police Department (SPPD), and is pursuing legal action, after a Dane County Sheriff’s Deputy followed a 19-year-old woman for more than six miles, handcuffed her father, forcibly threw her to the ground and violently detained her without provocation.Sun Prairie Police body camera video shows Bryanna Montgomery, 19, was backing away from Deputy Tory Boyce when he grabbed her arm and the back of her neck, throwing her to the ground and kneeling on her back. With the assistance of Sun Prairie Police officer Tyler Chitwood, who also knelt on Bryanna Montgomery’s back, Boyce placed Montgomery in the back of his patrol car.“I’m about to watch my kid get killed in front of our (expletive) house,” Jovan Montgomery recalls thinking. He said he may pursue therapy, as the whole encounter has given him recurring nightmares.A Sun Prairie Police Department spokesman said the department is looking into the case but could not comment at this time. “The Dane County Sheriff’s Office takes all complaints about the conduct of our employees seriously. Maintaining the trust and confidence of our community members is of the utmost importance,” Dane County Sheriff Kalvin Barret said in an email to Madison365. “Whenever we receive a complaint, we thoroughly review the matter and take appropriate action based on the outcome of the investigation.”The following video comes from two SPPD body cameras. The second depicts a better view of Boyce’s actions but is muted, which is against SPPD policy. The video contains profanity and disturbing images.youtu.be/Q1m7lt0gYOs?si=mZGLeF-gYyLHu0EwAll eight body camera videos are available at this link: youtu.be/AwpbkPlcdkEThe incidentJovan Montgomery told Madison365 that he and his daughter Bryanna had gone to Madison’s east side to pick up his other daughter’s car late Wednesday, July 29. Bryanna was driving that car back to their home in Sun Prairie, with Jovan in his car behind. He said he noticed a Dane County Sheriff’s Deputy following closely behind Bryanna on the East Side of Madison, and that the deputy continued to follow her all the way to Sun Prairie. A ticket mailed to Bryanna subsequently alleges that she ran the stop sign at Portage Road and Hanson Road in the Town of Burke. Google Maps indicates that it’s a 6.6-mile drive from there to the Montgomery home, which is where Boyce finally turned on his lights and pulled Bryanna over.A DCSO representative said there’s no set policy on how long it should take to initiate a traffic stop after a deputy observes a violation.“The timeline completely depends on the discretion of the individual law enforcement officer surrounding the anticipated contact,” DCSO Public Information Officer Elise Shaffer wrote in an email responding to Madison365’s questions. “Every contact with the public presents its own unique set of circumstances.”Madison365 has submitted open records requests for Boyce’s patrol car dash cam video. The dark blue route is the one Jovan Montgomery said he and his daughter took from the East Side of Madison to Sun Prairie, with Sheriff’s Deputy Tory Boyce following the entire way. Jovan Montgomery said he followed the deputy as the deputy followed Byranna, calling his wife, who was at home. When they arrived home and the deputy turned his lights on, Jovan parked behind the deputy’s car. Jovan got out of his car just as Boyce was getting out of his, and Jovan said Boyce immediately shone his flashlight into Jovan’s eyes and demanded to see his ID. Jovan Montgomery said he asked what crime he had committed, and declined to show his ID. A law enforcement officer can ask anyone for an ID, and a person can decline that request, unless the officer has reasonable suspicion that they’ve committed a crime, Shaffer said. “He probably wanted to see if I got a warrant (for arrest),” Jovan Montgomery said. “I don’t. Once he saw me, he saw a Black man, and he’s like, ‘target acquired.'”After declining to provide an ID, Jovan Montgomery walked onto his front lawn and requested Boyce summon assistance from the Sun Prairie Police Department (SPPD), because he knew SPPD uses body cameras. Eight SPPD officers arrived very shortly thereafter.SPPD body camera video indicates that Boyce told SPPD officers “he’s detained, she’s detained,” pointing in turn at Jovan and Bryanna Montgomery. Jovan Montgomery’s wife and Bryanna’s stepmother, Emily Wendt, was also outside and vocally confrontational with police, but was not detained.Wendt is white. Jovan and Bryanna Montgomery are Black.SPPD officer Tyler Chitwood wrote in an incident report that he asked Boyce if he wanted Jovan Montgomery in handcuffs, and that Boyce said yes.Chitwood’s body camera video shows that he asked, “You want him actually detained?” And Boyce answered, “Yes, with the way he’s acting,” as Jovan Montgomery, standing on his front lawn, took a step back with his arms folded.Chitwood and officer Odalys Gloria then placed Jovan Montgomery in handcuffs. Chitwood wrote in his report that Jovan Montgomery offered “passive resistance” by tensing his arm, but complied.Shaffer said Wisconsin law enforcement officers “are allowed to handcuff a person when that person is under formal arrest, placed in protective custody, or when a law enforcement officer has specific articulable facts showing the person poses a safety or flight risk during temporary detention.”Madison365 has submitted open records requests for Deputy Boyce’s incident reports to ascertain whether he articulated any such facts. Shaffer could not answer whether his reports contain such facts.Video recorded by Chitwood and Gloria then shows Boyce speaking with Bryanna Montgomery on the sidewalk. Boyce said he wanted to “explain the traffic stop” and seemed to indicate he wanted Bryanna Montgomery to move closer to the street for that purpose. It’s unclear why he couldn’t explain the traffic stop where they were standing, on the sidewalk. Bryanna Montgomery did not seem threatening, nor did she seem to be attempting to flee. However, when she refused to walk with Boyce toward the street, he grabbed her upper arm with one hand, the back of her neck with the other and threw her face-first to the ground, on the strip of grass between the sidewalk and the curb. While Wendt screamed and implored officers to get off of her, and Jovan told Bryanna to hold still and calm down, both Chitwood and Boyce knelt on her back while securing her in handcuffs. She said once that she couldn’t breathe. Once they had her cuffed, Chitwood asked whether she needed an ambulance; she said no. They then walked her to a patrol car and she voluntarily got in the back seat, saying, “I weigh like 20 times less than both of you. You don’t need two grown men on my (expletive) back.”A few minutes later, a DCSO Sergeant arrived and walked Jovan toward his garage door, away from the SPPD officers. Jovan said he explained the situation to the sergeant and the sergeant unlocked the handcuffs on him and instructed SPPD officers to get Bryanna out of the squad car and unlock the handcuffs on her. Boyce told Bryanna that he would mail a ticket, and the police all left.Bryanna Montgomery then received tickets in the mail for failure to obey a traffic sign, for following too closely and for driving without her driver’s license on her person. Jovan Montgomery received a ticket for following Boyce too closely. That ticket indicates the violation happened on Main Street in Sun Prairie, even though all three vehicles avoided Main Street due to road construction.“This was a big deal”After the police had all left, Wendt and Jovan Montgomery took Bryanna to the emergency room, where she was treated for a racing heart rate, difficulty breathing, and abrasions to her legs. A little over a week later, during an interview with Madison365, Jovan seemed more traumatized than Bryanna was.“You’re supposed to de-escalate,” he said of his expectations of police. “You’re supposed to make sure people feel safe. I don’t even feel safe in front of police anymore.”He said he remembers hearing Bryanna say, “We’re not doing this today” to Boyce, and thinking she meant, “we’re not doing what you guys just did a week ago with Corey (Ruiz),” referring to the man shot and killed by Madison police on July 22, just a week before this encounter. “That’s not gonna happen. You’re not gonna do any violence or murder somebody in front of our house. I’m no threat.”Bryanna said she felt more disrespected than fearful.“You’re not even talking to me like I’m a human,” Bryanna said. “You’re talking to me like you own me.”“It just seemed like it was just a really bad day, and it seemed like the deputy wanted to make it a worse day,” Jovan Montgomery said. “I really feel that I was being targeted… as a Black man.”The family has filed complaints with both DCSO and SPPD. They have also consulted an attorney and are considering a lawsuit against both agencies.“I want a public apology towards me and for my child, because a routine traffic stop should not turn into where people are being thrown around like rag dolls or like we’re slaves,” Jovan said. “Those days are over with.”Wendt said she wants “some accountability that something’s going to change. There’s going to have to be some monetary compensation, too. This is trauma… what we want is acknowledgement. We want Byranna’s case to mean something for change. This was a big deal.”Please note: This story was provided to CNN Wire by an affiliate and does not contain original CNN reporting. This content carries a strict local market embargo. If you share the same market as the contributor of this article, you may not use it on any platform.
Read Next Story