Skip to main content

How to Use Federal Loans to Attend College Internationally

Many people embrace college as a time to try new experiences. And living and studying in another country is one way to do just that.

Fortunately, federal student loans can be used to pay for a degree earned outside the country, so long as a school is eligible to receive Title IV funding.

“There are 100s of these participating schools,” says Bethany Hubert, campus partnership marketing manager with student loan servicer Navient.

The process of applying for and receiving federal student loans is the same regardless of whether you attend college in the U.S. or at an international school. However, some international schools may have relatively little experience in accepting and processing these loans.

For that reason, “(Students) have to get on it real quick and real early,” according to Tom O’Hare, a holistic college and career advisor. He says students shouldn’t wait until the last minute to confirm that their school financing is in order.

Keep reading for more about using federal student loans to attend a foreign college or university.

Using Federal Loans at an International College

To receive any federal student aid, a person must complete the Free Application for Federal Student Aid, known as the FAFSA.

“They would just be filing the FAFSA and adding the school code,” according to Hubert.

The school code tells the federal government where to send the application and, eventually, the aid. These codes can be found while completing the application, using the search tool within the FAFSA.

“The U.S. treats them the same as any other school,” says Dan Farnesi, chief financial officer advisor with HelloCollege, which provides college admissions counseling.

Students can use loans from the direct loan program at international colleges. These include subsidized, unsubsidized and PLUS loans. The Federal Pell Grant and TEACH Grant cannot be used at international schools.

Note that you would only include an international school code on the FAFSA if you are enrolled as a regular student who is earning a degree from that institution. If you are completing a study abroad program through a U.S. college or university, you should include the school code for your home institution on your FAFSA.

[Read: Best Private Student Loans.]

Foreign Colleges Participating in Title IV

Participating international schools can fall into two categories: eligible and deferment only.

Deferment-only schools are those where students can defer making payments on existing federal student loans while enrolled. You can’t take out new loans to attend a deferment-only school. Eligible schools are those in which you can borrow money from the federal student loan program to pay for your education.

Eligible schools are concentrated in England, Canada and Australia. Examples include the following:

Australian National University

McGill University

University of Toronto

University of Cambridge

University of Oxford

Eligible schools can also be found in Egypt, France, Ireland, Israel, South Africa and elsewhere around the world.

Be aware that the list of participating schools can change each year. If your school stops participating in the Title IV program, you may not be able to get future loans.

“Most of the schools that are doing it have been in there long enough that it shouldn’t be a problem,” O’Hare says.

Check how long an international school has participated and have a contingency plan to reduce the possibility of a disruption to your education.

“You have to go in with your eyes wide open and look beyond the current year,” Farnesi says.

[Read: Best Student Loan Refinance Lenders.]

Other Ways to Pay for an International College

Federal subsidized and unsubsidized loans are capped at $5,500 to $12,500 per academic year, depending on your year in school and dependency status. For many students, that won’t be enough to earn a degree.

“Most international schools don’t give U.S. students scholarships and grants,” O’Hare says.

Instead, you might need to look for other sources of income. That may include personal savings, working during the summer or taking out private loans.

“Earnest does provide private student loans (for international schools), but not all do,” Hubert says. Earnest is a private lender affiliated with Navient.

Regardless of where you get the money, be sure you are prepared for contingencies. Have enough funds to pay for living expenses, health care and outings. You should also plan for a currency buffer to account for exchange rate fluctuations.

More from U.S. News

Where Do Federal Student Loans Come From?

Should You Refinance Your Student Loans in 2026?

Fixed or Variable Student Loan: Which Is Better?

How to Use Federal Loans to Attend College Internationally originally appeared on usnews.com

Iran plays by Trump’s rules to deepen his war dilemma

(CNN) — Iran seems to be playing Donald Trump at his own game.The president complained Monday that the Islamic Republic can’t be trusted to honor an agreement, rebuking its rulers for one of his own signature moves.“It was a done deal, and then they broke it. They always break it,” he told Fox News of the memorandum of understanding that briefly paused the war. Trump did not seem to appreciate the irony of his critique, given his habit of walking out on multiple international agreements, including the Paris Climate Accord (twice). Some critics would trace America’s current predicament to Trump’s first-term decision to scrap the Obama-era deal capping Iran’s nuclear program.Later in the day, a frustrated Trump vowed to impose his own toll on ships transiting the Strait of Hormuz. Iran — in an offer laced with sarcasm — jumped in with a better price than the author of “Art of the Deal.”“POTUS is absolutely right,” Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi wrote on X, arguing that Trump had legitimized Tehran’s position on charging for passage through the vital waterway. Araghchi added archly: “20% is of course too much. We will be fair.”Trump is finding out that Iran drives a hard bargain and has its own interpretation of what was in the memo. And he’s yet to clearly explain to Americans why he reignited a war that he repeatedly said he’d already won.Weeks after declaring that an MOU he signed with a flourish meant he’d forever ended Iran’s nuclear program and brought peace to the Middle East for the first time in 3,000 years, he’s changed his tune. Trump said on Hugh Hewitt’s radio show Monday the deal was a “test” Iran had failed and “didn’t mean much.”Once, admirers might have argued Trump’s sharp contradictions are evidence he’s playing four-dimensional diplomatic chess. Now he’s at best locked in a stalemate.Trump can’t change the reality of the warThe MOU crumbled because Iran acted to defend its top victory in the war — effective control over the strait. This reinforced a harsh reality for the US: For all Trump’s threats and military power, Tehran is still dictating the dynamics of the showdown. And the equation that defined the war remains unchanged: The Islamic Republic is using geography and a shrewd understanding of its own limited power to outmaneuver a superpower adversary.The new test of wills sprang partly from the administration’s rush to negotiate an MOU that contained imprecise language. Trump’s team of real estate negotiators under the leadership of Vice President JD Vance appeared to miss what critics more steeped in history and diplomacy immediately realized: that Iran would use it to grab new leverage.For example, the agreement called on Tehran to “make arrangements” for the free and safe passage of commercial vessels through the strait for 60 days and required it to work with Oman to “define the future administration and maritime services” in the strait. Superficially, this gives the US what it wants — the normal operation of the strait. But Iran seems to view it as confirmation it will control the waterway after a permanent agreement. It’s hardly surprising, therefore, it’s fighting to shape the new status quo.The misstep compounded an earlier mistake — the failure to understand that Iran would close the strait in the first place. That this is still an issue a month after the MOU was agreed upon suggests its 60-day timeline for a full deal, including on Iran’s nuclear program, was absurdly unrealistic.The administration’s struggles to compel Iranian behavior raise the bar for questions about Trump’s return to war.Is there, for instance, reason to believe that attacks on Iranian targets and Trump’s restoration of a naval blockade will be any more successful in changing the calculations of the new Iranian leaders than they were before? After all, Iran needed only a few missiles and drones to close down the strait again.And will swiftly mounting economic costs — oil and diesel futures shot up on Monday — again convince the president to blink to avoid the political and economic price that he candidly said last month he wasn’t willing to pay?Why all-out war could still be avertedOne reason for hope is that the renewed clashes could imply the US and Iran are seeking to cement their own interpretation of the MOU to set the table for future diplomacy.Trump, for example, has shown no sign that he’s willing to pay a possibly heavy price in US casualties from invading the Iranian oil-producing hub at Kharg Island — one possible way to impose American superiority. Some other modern presidents, including Lyndon Johnson and George W. Bush, by contrast, intensified wars that already seemed inconclusive.And unlike his friend Russian President Vladimir Putin, the US president hasn’t responded to his strategic humiliation in a war that underestimated an opponent by launching all-out war on civilians. Tragedy did strike early in the war when an errant US attack struck an Iranian school, killing 168 children and 14 teachers, according to Iranian officials. And the full civilian toll of attacks is unknown.But Trump has not followed through on earlier threats to target infrastructure like bridges and power plants, which would severely impact civilian life. And Iran has maintained its own ceiling on escalation with its reprisals against US regional bases or its Gulf neighbors.The battlefield choreography, meanwhile, currently reflects a conflict that is simmering rather than raging out of control.“There is room for diplomacy, I think, despite the expanded attacks of the US against Iran (and) Iranian retaliation,” Danny Citrinowicz, senior researcher in the Iran and the Shiite Axis Program at Israel’s Institute for National Security Studies, told CNN’s Becky Anderson on “Connect the World.” But, he, added: “Things can get out of control and escalate because when you have back-and-forth attacks every day, every night, definitely it’s hard to preserve the rule of the game.”And even if the fresh conflagration stays just below the boil, Trump must still answer a question with which he’s been unsuccessfully wrestling for nearly five months.How does he get out of the war?The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story