Skip to main content

7 Best Fidelity ETFs to Buy Now

Exchange-traded funds, or ETFs, streamline investing and make a diverse portfolio more accessible to everyone. You don’t have to meticulously analyze stocks and market trends on a daily basis to generate solid long-term returns. Fund managers do the work for you with various ETFs, and some of those funds are quite cheap.

Fidelity ETFs are known for their low expense ratios and high average annual returns. Some of Fidelity’s top funds have expense ratios below 0.2%. That means for each $10,000 you put into these ETFs, you pay $20 per year or less in fees. As a result, you can end up with better returns.

[Sign up for stock news with our Invested newsletter.]

Investing in ETFs offers several benefits that you may not get from constructing your own portfolio. Cristian Mundy, a certified financial planner and senior wealth manager at LifeLine Financial & Wealth Management Group, explains the advantages of ETFs like those that Fidelity offers. “Buying ETFs provides a high level of diversification, providing a broad range of asset exposure in specific sectors or indexes under a single investment. ETFs tend to have lower management fees and internal costs as compared to mutual funds, allowing for more compounded interest over time.”

Typically, there are no investment minimums, other than the share price, required to get started with ETFs, making them easily accessible. “ETFs trade through the trading day, therefore you can have a higher level of liquidity during market hours and transparency throughout,” Mundy explains.

Fidelity has offered ETFs since 2003 and now has dozens of them in a wide range of sectors and industries. You can find low-volatility ETFs that focus on fixed income as well as those that focus on high-yield dividend stocks. However, if you want to increase your returns, Fidelity’s growth ETFs offer exposure to companies that post impressive revenue and earnings growth.

If you want to grow your portfolio while paying low fees, consider these top Fidelity ETFs for the long run:

Fidelity ETF Expense Ratio Assets
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (ticker: FBCG) 0.57% $5.3 billion
Fidelity Disruptive Technology ETF (FDTX) 0.50% $182.3 million
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ) 0.21% $8.8 billion
Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF (FELG) 0.18% $4.7 billion
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) 0.084% $15.6 billion
Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) 0.15% $8.5 billion
Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF (FBOT) 0.50% $177.4 million

Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG)

The Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF gives investors exposure to roughly 200 large-growth stocks. It’s not as diversified as you would think, based on 62% of total assets going into the top 10 holdings, however. You’ll see familiar names at the top of the list, such as Nvidia Corp. (NVDA), Amazon.com Inc. (AMZN), Microsoft Corp. (MSFT), Apple Inc. (AAPL), Meta Platforms Inc. (META) and Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL).

The top-heavy approach has been a boon for investors recently. Shares have produced an average annual return of 28.8% over the past three years and an 11.9% annualized return over five. Blue Chip Growth doesn’t have as much history as some other Fidelity ETFs, but it’s been around long enough to show its potential to outperform the market.

The actively managed fund allocates at least 80% of its assets to blue-chip companies and is filled with tech giants. It has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is pretty fair trade considering the fund’s long-term returns. FBCG has $5.3 billion in total assets.

Fidelity Disruptive Technology ETF (FDTX)

The Fidelity Disruptive Technology ETF is a top Fidelity ETF for growth investors who are eager to take risks for higher potential payoffs. The fund focuses on technology that is at the forefront of economic progress, such as advanced artificial intelligence chips and e-commerce.

Almost half of its assets are concentrated in the top 10 holdings, with chip giant Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Ltd. (TSM) in the top position as of March 19. A few Magnificent Seven stocks also show up in the top 10, with Micron Technology Inc. (MU) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) being some of the other notable top holdings.

FDTX has a 0.5% expense ratio, but the returns make up for it: an annualized 22.8% return over the past three years. FDTX only has $182.3 million in assets under management, so the expense ratio should theoretically go down as more people invest in the fund.

Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ)

The Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF is an elder in the ETF community, having been around since 2003. It’s the first ETF Fidelity launched, and it’s still beating the market all these years later. ONEQ uses the Nasdaq composite index as a benchmark, with at least 80% of its assets in common stocks included in the index. This winning formula has produced an annualized 16.4% return over the past 15 years. Its average annual three-year return is even higher, coming in at 24.8%.

The top 10 holdings make up 58% of the fund’s portfolio, and the Magnificent Seven, Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) and Walmart Inc. (WMT) are at the top of the pack. ONEQ has $8.8 billion in assets, a 0.21% expense ratio and a 0.36% 30-day SEC yield.

Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF (FELG)

The Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF has a 0.18% expense ratio and $4.7 billion in total assets. About 50% of the fund is allocated to the technology sector, with a strong emphasis on semiconductor and software stocks.

More than 80% of the fund’s assets are in mega-cap stocks. Unsurprisingly, the top three stocks are Nvidia, Apple and Microsoft. Each of these stocks makes up more than 8% of FELG’s total assets. This top-heavy ETF has allocated 60% of its total capital to its top 10 holdings.

Pouring funds into Magnificent Seven stocks has worked out well for this Fidelity ETF and many other funds, despite the recent pullback in the tech sector. FELG has an annualized 13.7% return over the past five years and 16.4% over the past decade. It pays a modest 0.56% 30-day SEC yield.

[Read: 7 Up-and-Coming Stocks to Buy]

Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC)

The Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF aims to mirror the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology Index. FTEC has been a top-performing Fidelity ETF, with a huge annualized return of 21.9% over the past decade.

This $15.6 billion ETF is mostly invested in tech stocks, with more than 98% of its total assets going into the high-growth sector. The communication services, industrial and financial sectors also have tiny slices of the fund’s assets.

FTEC puts 59% of its capital to work in its top 10 holdings. It’s even more concentrated when you narrow your focus to its top three: Nvidia, Apple and Microsoft make up more than 40% of its holdings. That said, the fund has a reasonable 0.084% expense ratio and a 0.41% 30-day SEC yield.

Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV)

The Fidelity High Dividend ETF is a passively managed fund that aims to mirror the performance of the Fidelity High Dividend Index. Although dividend-paying Magnificent Seven stocks make the list of top 10 holdings, there is also more emphasis on stable dividend growth than growth without cash flow. JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM), Coca-Cola Co. (KO) and Procter & Gamble Co. (PG) are some of the stocks in the top 10 holdings.

It’s also not as top-heavy as other funds, with 31% of its assets going into that top group of stocks; it holds 95 stocks in total. FDVV spreads most of its capital across large-cap stocks, and roughly one-quarter of its allocation is to the tech sector. The financial, consumer staples and real estate sectors also have significant influence on the fund’s total returns.

FDVV has delivered an annualized 13.2% return over the past five years and has a 2.6% 30-day SEC yield. That yield is more than enough to cover the $8.5 billion fund’s 0.15% expense ratio.

Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF (FBOT)

The Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF allocates at least 80% of its assets to disruptive automation companies. It gives investors exposure to megatrends like robotics, artificial intelligence, autonomous driving and 3D printing. FBOT has a 0.5% expense ratio and $177.4 million in assets. As the fund grows, those fees may ease a bit.

For now, FBOT’s long-term returns have been enough to keep investors on board despite the relatively high expenses. The fund has produced an annualized 14.8% gain over the past three years.

FBOT is fairly well diversified, with 41% of total assets split fairly evenly among the top 10 holdings. Taiwan Semiconductor has the highest allotment, accounting for 7.2% of the fund. Teradyne Inc. (TER) is the second-largest holding at 6.9%, and Nvidia, Palantir and Alphabet are also in the top 10.

Should Investors Buy Multiple ETFs?

Some Fidelity ETFs deliver higher returns than others, but the possibility of higher returns also comes with more risk. Furthermore, you may be attracted to a Fidelity ETF that focuses on a single sector, but you’ll need additional ETFs for true diversification.

Mundy says owning multiple ETFs can be beneficial with proper allocation among the different sectors of the market. “Owning multiple ETFs that invest in the same companies, sectors and assets won’t provide the solution. You must look under the hood of that ETF to make sure they complement one another.” To put it another way, he adds, “Investors must be mindful of over-diversification and redundancy to ensure you’re getting the most out of your investments.”

More from U.S. News

7 Best ETFs to Buy Now

9 of the Best Bond ETFs to Buy for 2026

7 Best Cryptocurrency ETFs to Buy

7 Best Fidelity ETFs to Buy Now originally appeared on usnews.com

Update 03/20/26: This story was published at an earlier date and has been updated with new information.

US embassies in the Middle East prepare for extended period with reduced staff amid Iran war

(CNN) — The State Department is asking US embassies in the Middle East to create plans to continue operating with a small number of staff on the ground, sources told CNN, as the war with Iran shows no signs of resolution.Additionally, personnel who have been displaced from their posts in the Middle East are increasingly being given the option to curtail their assignments, the sources said.The plans have not been finalized, the sources said, and it is unclear if they will be implemented at all of the embassies that are currently on reduced staffing. Still, the developments underscore that the State Department does not expect to return to normal staffing in the region soon amid the looming threat of a full-scale return to war.A State Department spokesperson told CNN that they “do not discuss internal deliberations or post-specific contingency planning,” but noted that the department “continually reviews the security and staffing posture at every diplomatic mission based on conditions on the ground and adjusts personnel levels as appropriate.”“The safety and security of our personnel and their families remains the Department’s top priority as we continue to assess conditions across the region,” the spokesperson said. “Decisions regarding the status of any post are made based on a range of security and operational factors, in close coordination between posts and Washington.”“Personnel matters, including individual curtailment requests, are handled on a case-by-case basis,” they added.The State Department ordered nonemergency personnel and family members to leave almost every diplomatic post in the region shortly after the war began in late February. That has led to nearly six months of uncertainty about whether the posts would be able to return to normal and all diplomats could return. The plans for “reduced operations,” once finalized, could provide some clarity to US diplomats and their families who have been displaced.Meanwhile, efforts to bring the war to an end have faltered. The memorandum of understanding between the two sides has collapsed. There was more than a week of back-and-forth strikes at the end of July. A renewed push for an agreement to fully reopen the Strait of Hormuz has yet to succeed.The State Department did not reduce staffing at most of its embassies in the region before the US and Israel began their military campaign. Ahead of the war, only Lebanon and Israel were in ordered and authorized departure status, respectively. Authorized departure means nonemergency personnel and family members could choose to leave but were not required to.Within weeks, as US diplomatic facilities across the region came under attack by Iran and its proxies, the department ordered nonemergency personnel and families to leave Bahrain, Iraq, Jordan, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. The US Embassy in Kuwait suspended operations entirely in March and only resumed emergency operations for Americans in late June. It remains under ordered departure. The US Embassy in Oman is under authorized departure.The sudden drawdown in staffing left diplomats and family members, many of whom had years left on their assignments, scrambling to find housing and to enroll their children in school back in the US. However, because it was unclear how long embassies would operate with reduced staffing, families couldn’t make longer-term commitments when they returned home. If normal operations resumed, they would be expected to quickly return to the Middle East.One diplomatic spouse said their family has been “hopping around to different housing situations this whole time,” because they couldn’t risk the potential financial repercussions of signing a long-term lease and breaking it.“We’ve had evacuations in various parts of the world, but this is different in that there’s such a large portion of people from one part of the world with so many people coming back to one spot,” they added.Those who were forced to leave the region left behind almost all of their belongings, as well as support networks of friends who can be critical to an overseas posting.The diplomatic spouse told CNN they feel “a tremendous sadness” for “the people we care about and the work that we’re part of” in the region.“We had no idea when we walked out of our house in March that we not only wouldn’t be returning in six months, but now the reality is, we won’t be returning at all,” they said, requesting anonymity due to concerns of retaliation.Under State Department rules, diplomatic posts cannot have their “ordered departure” status extended for more than 180 days. Once that limit is reached, if they are unable to return to normal status, they switch to “restricted operations,” which includes caps on in-country staffing. The State Department’s foreign affairs manual notes that restricted status “is intended as a temporary measure to address safety and security,” but “it may continue as long as necessary to ensure that adequate safety and security measures are in place.”For the posts in the Middle East, restricted operations status will likely mean no children and few spouses will be allowed to return, sources said.The State Department spokesperson said the department remains “committed to supporting our workforce and their families throughout this process and will provide updates through appropriate channels as decisions are made.”It will also mean a continued shortage of US diplomats on the ground. For those who are still not able to return to their posts, they may try to curtail, but it is not clear whether there are enough alternate jobs for them.And fewer diplomats on the ground could impact the State Department’s ability to provide quick consular assistance to Americans abroad and to advance the administration’s priorities, former diplomats said.“When you have fewer people, there’s less you can do, and there’s a lot that you cannot do remotely,” said John Bass, a former career diplomat who served as an under secretary of state for management.“The fewer diplomats you have in country, the fewer people you have who are focused on what is happening in that country, in that government, keeping tabs on key issues for the United States,” he explained. “You’ve got fewer people there to be promoting the US government’s views on what is happening and why, and what is in our interests and the interests of that country, working together, to try to solve a common problem.”He noted that leaders might discuss a broad agreement on a matter, but it comes down to the experienced diplomats on the ground “to be able to really get into the details with that host government about how to move forward.”Bass, who was an ambassador to Turkey, Georgia and Afghanistan, told CNN that the restricted operations status could potentially last “for months, if not years.”The State Department spokesperson disputed the idea that diplomatic efforts by the US have been “limited” by having fewer people on the ground.“We have seen sustained engagement from the highest levels of the Trump Administration with our partners in the Middle East, and our relationship with our allies in the region continues to get stronger,” they said.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story