Skip to main content

The Fed Holds Steady: Could That Be Good News for the Housing Market?

As expected, the Federal Reserve did not make any changes to the federal funds rate during its January meeting. That isn’t necessarily bad news for mortgage rates either.

“The Fed is the weather, not the thermostat,” says Dan Snyder, CEO of mortgage lender Lower.

In other words, the Federal Reserve doesn’t set mortgage rates, but its actions reflect current economic conditions. More important than its decision might be the general sentiment as to which way the economy is headed. When it comes to mortgage rates, stability is a good thing, according to Snyder.

[Compare: Compare Current Mortgage Rates]

The Federal Reserve and Mortgage Rates

The Federal Reserve sets only one interest rate: the federal funds rate. This is the amount of interest financial institutions charge one another for borrowing money overnight.

After reducing the federal funds rate at its last three meetings, the Federal Reserve Board voted to maintain the current target range of 3.5% to 3.75%.

While the federal funds rate is not directly tied to consumer lending, it can influence other interest rates, such as those for mortgages. However, the two don’t always move in tandem. In fact, in 2024, at a time when the federal funds rate dropped by one percentage point, mortgage rates actually increased.

Mortgage rates are more closely tied to the 10-year Treasury yield than the federal funds rate. However, lenders ultimately set their rates based on a variety of factors such as credit risk, inflation risk and profit.

[Read: Best Mortgage Lenders]

Messaging Just as Important as Rates

President Donald Trump has been vocal about his belief that the Federal Reserve should be more aggressive in lowering interest rates, but not everyone believes that is needed to lower the cost of mortgages.

“I think what matters is the messaging,” says Matt Weaver, vice president of sales for CrossCountry Mortgage. He says the decision of the Fed to maintain interest rates is less important than the way its decision is framed.

Markets, including the housing market, can respond to news even if nothing has changed in the economy. That was seen in Trump’s recent announcement directing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to purchase up to $200 billion in mortgage bonds.

“That in and of itself created a lot of confidence,” Weaver says.

Even without the bond purchase taking place yet, the announcement spurred significant activity within the mortgage market, according to Weaver. Mortgage rates for 30-year loans also briefly dipped below 6% for the first time in three years in the wake of that news.

[See: Best Mortgage Lenders for First-Time Homebuyers]

Fed Hits Note of Cautious Optimism

In a statement announcing its decision to maintain interest rates, the Federal Reserve Board noted, “Available indicators suggest that economic activity has been expanding at a solid pace. Job gains have remained low, and the unemployment rate has shown some signs of stabilization. Inflation remains somewhat elevated.”

There was no immediate reaction from the markets, suggesting the news was no surprise. Snyder notes that markets like stability, so keeping the federal funds rate at the status quo isn’t likely to have much impact on mortgage rates.

A bigger question for the housing market may be how consumers interpret the news. “The swirl of consumer sentiment is a real thing,” Snyder says.

Consumers are more likely to make a major purchase when they feel confident about the direction of the economy. Weaver estimates that more than 70% of homeowners are not currently in their ideal home. However, people may not be likely to make a move if they are reading negative headlines and hearing mixed messages from leaders.

Mortgage Rate Predictions for 2026

While the federal funds rate remains the same for now, Powell didn’t rule out future cuts, saying, “After the three recent rate cuts, we are well-positioned to address the risks we face on both sides of our dual mandate and will continue to make our decisions meeting by meeting, based on the incoming data and the implications and outlook of balances and risks.”

The housing market has been flat for about three years — trapped in what Weaver calls a “purgatory.” However, he sees promise in the fact that new initiatives are being proposed by the president and others to help jump-start housing sales. “When it’s being brought to the forefront, that is the recipe for getting people more interested in purchasing,” he says.

As for the rates themselves, Snyder predicts they will land between 5.5% and 6.25% this year. Still, people shouldn’t base their decision to buy a home on mortgage rates alone.

“If you’re going to buy a house, go buy a house,” Snyder says. “It’s the best investment you can make.”

More from U.S. News

How to Refinance a Rental Property

How to Shop for a Mortgage Without Hurting Your Credit Score

Historical Mortgage Rates: See Averages and Trends by Decade

The Fed Holds Steady: Could That Be Good News for the Housing Market? originally appeared on usnews.com

Trump declines to rule out declaring a national security emergency to control the 2026 election

(CNN) — President Donald Trump in a new interview declined to rule out declaring a national security emergency as a means to try to assert more control over the 2026 midterm elections.It’s merely the latest warning sign that Trump could try to mess with the election not just by baselessly claiming voter fraud and challenging the results afterward — as he did in 2020, leading to a violent riot at the US Capitol — but by trying to unilaterally take control before votes are cast.In the interview, Wayne Allyn Root of Real America’s Voice pitched such a scenario to Trump. He suggested it as an alternative, given the Senate has failed to pass Trump’s coveted elections bill, known as the “SAVE America Act.”“If they never get the SAVE America Act done, you have the right to declare a national security emergency for elections,” Root said. He added that “if you declare a national security emergency as the president of the United States, they can’t challenge it. It can only be overturned by a two-thirds vote by both houses of Congress. So if you do this in the next month, we will get photo ID, proof of citizenship (for voter registration) and a limit to mail-in ballots.”It’s at this point that Trump cut Root off and coyly suggested such an option was indeed in play.“Let me just say that stranger things have happened, OK?” Trump said. “I’ll leave it at that.”Despite Root’s comments, it’s far from clear such a gambit would even work. And CNN has asked the White House for more detail on what the president meant.Trump often responds to hypotheticals by declining to rule them out — no matter how extreme the proposal might be. So it’s possible to read too much into this.But as CNN’s Jake Tapper has noted, there are plenty of signals that Trump at least aspires to try to exert more control over elections. And these methods often appear transparently geared toward helping Republicans.A major one is the administration’s threat to have the US Postal Service not deliver mail ballots for states that don’t comply with its demand that they hand over their voter lists. This is a request that even many red states have rejected, citing privacy concerns.Democrats are much more likely to use mail ballots, which Trump has baselessly connected to widespread fraud. So curtailing them could greatly help Republicans.(Federal courts have blocked this Trump executive order, and the administration recently appealed to the Supreme Court.)Trump has also gone to great lengths to try to substantiate his still-baseless claims of widespread fraud. That includes the administration seizing 2020 ballots in Fulton County, Georgia, and Trump’s recent primetime address about election security that some read as a statement of intent — a pretext for more direct federal involvement in elections, which are run by states.Ty Cobb, who served as White House counsel in Trump’s first term, said he interpreted the speech last month as a “predicate that he needs to declare an emergency.”And Trump has occasionally said things, like he did in the new interview, suggesting he would like to take control of US elections.Back in February, he urged his party to “take over the voting in at least 15 places,” adding: “The Republicans ought to nationalize the voting.”The Washington Post also reported in March that pro-Trump activists were circulating a potential executive order that claimed Chinese interference in the 2020 election gave Trump emergency authorities over the 2026 election. And Trump’s primetime address focused on China, despite the tenuous evidence.Trump’s intense focus on the “SAVE America Act,” which has never appeared to have a chance to pass but Trump has said is vital, could also be read as part of building the case for more drastic action.But whether Trump could take over elections himself, as Root posits, is far from certain.As CNN’s Marshall Cohen and Michael Williams reported in February, the Constitution makes it difficult for Trump to truly “nationalize” elections. Courts have overwhelmingly upheld the principle that states are in charge of elections.Presidents generally have more authority to act unilaterally when national security is involved — hence the significance of invoking China — but some experts are skeptical that Trump’s effort would pass legal muster.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story