Skip to main content

Could Trump’s Rate Cap Kill Your Credit Card?

While President Donald Trump’s proposed 10% cap on credit card interest rates might seem appealing at first to consumers, it’s important to remember that not everything that glitters is gold.

From the credit industry to advocacy groups, experts agree such a cap could limit credit access and have unintended rippling effects across an already shaky economy.

What a 10% Cap Means for Consumers

The Electronic Payments Coalition released a study this week in response to Trump’s proposed 10% cap, stating that “90% of current cardholders — between 175 (million)-190 million Americans — would effectively lose access to credit. Essentially, any American with a credit score of less than 740 would see their card eliminated or credit limit drastically reduced.”

According to the most recent Federal Reserve data, credit card rates on all accounts assessed interest average 22.3%.

EPC Executive Chairman Richard Hunt said in a statement, “A one-size-fits-all government price cap may sound appealing, but it wouldn’t help Americans — it would do the exact opposite, harming families, limiting opportunity and weakening our economy.”

Restricted access to credit would likely lead to a rise in predatory lending practices as well, according to many experts. “If banks refuse to offer credit to those customers, it’s entirely likely they will need something to address their short-term cash flow challenges,” says Adam Rust, director of financial services for the Consumer Federation of America. “And the alternatives — such as payday loans — are problematic.”

Celia Winslow, president and CEO of American Financial Services Association, says that “interest rates are not really the best way to measure whether or not credit is affordable. It’s been shown time and time again that every time you put an interest rate cap in, credit is cut off. And it’s often for the near-prime or subprime borrowers. But a rate as low as 10% would cut credit cards off for an even larger number of people.”

[Read: Credit Cards With No Annual Fee]

Potential Trade-offs

So what if you have a credit score above 740? A 10% cap is good news for you, isn’t it? Not necessarily.

The EPC stated that “cardholders who retain access to credit would likely face lower credit limits, tighter credit standards and reduced rewards. These effects are likely to be imposed on all open accounts, irrespective of credit score.”

So under a cap as low as 10%, your credit card rewards might not be worth as much. And you’d most likely see credit card issuers implementing other strategies to make up for the loss in revenue — such as increased annual fees, reduced benefits and lowered credit limits.

“If profit is squeezed in one place, where does it make up? Historically, it’s not just within the credit card space itself, it can be other places in the company as well,” Winslow says, referencing the reduction in free checking after the CARD Act was passed in 2009. “Before the CARD Act was passed, many consumers had free checking accounts. After that amendment passed, we saw free checking go away for a lot of people. Now, if you don’t want to pay for your checking account, you either have to keep a certain amount of money in your account, sign up for direct deposit or certain other qualifiers.”

Banks still would be making money on credit cards, Rust says.

Rust says that “even with a rate cap, credit cards are still going to be enormously profitable. With over $150 billion in swipe fees in 2024, and tens of billions of dollars in other fees, no rational CEO is going to abandon that kind of business to make more mortgages at 6%.”

[Read: Rewards Credit Cards]

Bottom Line

A 10% cap on credit card interest rates may seem good at first blush, but the reality is a little more complex than that. “A 10% rate cap might not be the right number,” says Rust. “The goal is to find a way to make the cost of credit more reasonable without reducing credit availability. That’s the essential issue here. Credit unions offer credit cards at rates at or below 18%, and they are able to do that. So they’ve shown the precedent can exist for there to be a cap that works.”

More from U.S. News

Payday Loans Can Cost You 664% APR. Here’s What to Do Instead.

Trump Says He’ll Cap Your Credit Card Rate at 10%. Well, Maybe

Would a 10% Credit Card Interest Rate Cap Be a Totally Good Thing for Consumers?

Could Trump’s Rate Cap Kill Your Credit Card? originally appeared on usnews.com

Deputy followed her six miles, then threw her to the ground: Sun Prairie family alleges racial profiling, excessive force

Click here for updates on this story    SUN PRAIRIE, WI (365 Media Foundation, Inc) -- A Sun Prairie family has filed complaints with the Dane County Sheriff’s Office (DCSO) and Sun Prairie Police Department (SPPD), and is pursuing legal action, after a Dane County Sheriff’s Deputy followed a 19-year-old woman for more than six miles, handcuffed her father, forcibly threw her to the ground and violently detained her without provocation.Sun Prairie Police body camera video shows Bryanna Montgomery, 19, was backing away from Deputy Tory Boyce when he grabbed her arm and the back of her neck, throwing her to the ground and kneeling on her back. With the assistance of Sun Prairie Police officer Tyler Chitwood, who also knelt on Bryanna Montgomery’s back, Boyce placed Montgomery in the back of his patrol car.“I’m about to watch my kid get killed in front of our (expletive) house,” Jovan Montgomery recalls thinking. He said he may pursue therapy, as the whole encounter has given him recurring nightmares.A Sun Prairie Police Department spokesman said the department is looking into the case but could not comment at this time. “The Dane County Sheriff’s Office takes all complaints about the conduct of our employees seriously. Maintaining the trust and confidence of our community members is of the utmost importance,” Dane County Sheriff Kalvin Barret said in an email to Madison365. “Whenever we receive a complaint, we thoroughly review the matter and take appropriate action based on the outcome of the investigation.”The following video comes from two SPPD body cameras. The second depicts a better view of Boyce’s actions but is muted, which is against SPPD policy. The video contains profanity and disturbing images.youtu.be/Q1m7lt0gYOs?si=mZGLeF-gYyLHu0EwAll eight body camera videos are available at this link: youtu.be/AwpbkPlcdkEThe incidentJovan Montgomery told Madison365 that he and his daughter Bryanna had gone to Madison’s east side to pick up his other daughter’s car late Wednesday, July 29. Bryanna was driving that car back to their home in Sun Prairie, with Jovan in his car behind. He said he noticed a Dane County Sheriff’s Deputy following closely behind Bryanna on the East Side of Madison, and that the deputy continued to follow her all the way to Sun Prairie. A ticket mailed to Bryanna subsequently alleges that she ran the stop sign at Portage Road and Hanson Road in the Town of Burke. Google Maps indicates that it’s a 6.6-mile drive from there to the Montgomery home, which is where Boyce finally turned on his lights and pulled Bryanna over.A DCSO representative said there’s no set policy on how long it should take to initiate a traffic stop after a deputy observes a violation.“The timeline completely depends on the discretion of the individual law enforcement officer surrounding the anticipated contact,” DCSO Public Information Officer Elise Shaffer wrote in an email responding to Madison365’s questions. “Every contact with the public presents its own unique set of circumstances.”Madison365 has submitted open records requests for Boyce’s patrol car dash cam video. The dark blue route is the one Jovan Montgomery said he and his daughter took from the East Side of Madison to Sun Prairie, with Sheriff’s Deputy Tory Boyce following the entire way. Jovan Montgomery said he followed the deputy as the deputy followed Byranna, calling his wife, who was at home. When they arrived home and the deputy turned his lights on, Jovan parked behind the deputy’s car. Jovan got out of his car just as Boyce was getting out of his, and Jovan said Boyce immediately shone his flashlight into Jovan’s eyes and demanded to see his ID. Jovan Montgomery said he asked what crime he had committed, and declined to show his ID. A law enforcement officer can ask anyone for an ID, and a person can decline that request, unless the officer has reasonable suspicion that they’ve committed a crime, Shaffer said. “He probably wanted to see if I got a warrant (for arrest),” Jovan Montgomery said. “I don’t. Once he saw me, he saw a Black man, and he’s like, ‘target acquired.'”After declining to provide an ID, Jovan Montgomery walked onto his front lawn and requested Boyce summon assistance from the Sun Prairie Police Department (SPPD), because he knew SPPD uses body cameras. Eight SPPD officers arrived very shortly thereafter.SPPD body camera video indicates that Boyce told SPPD officers “he’s detained, she’s detained,” pointing in turn at Jovan and Bryanna Montgomery. Jovan Montgomery’s wife and Bryanna’s stepmother, Emily Wendt, was also outside and vocally confrontational with police, but was not detained.Wendt is white. Jovan and Bryanna Montgomery are Black.SPPD officer Tyler Chitwood wrote in an incident report that he asked Boyce if he wanted Jovan Montgomery in handcuffs, and that Boyce said yes.Chitwood’s body camera video shows that he asked, “You want him actually detained?” And Boyce answered, “Yes, with the way he’s acting,” as Jovan Montgomery, standing on his front lawn, took a step back with his arms folded.Chitwood and officer Odalys Gloria then placed Jovan Montgomery in handcuffs. Chitwood wrote in his report that Jovan Montgomery offered “passive resistance” by tensing his arm, but complied.Shaffer said Wisconsin law enforcement officers “are allowed to handcuff a person when that person is under formal arrest, placed in protective custody, or when a law enforcement officer has specific articulable facts showing the person poses a safety or flight risk during temporary detention.”Madison365 has submitted open records requests for Deputy Boyce’s incident reports to ascertain whether he articulated any such facts. Shaffer could not answer whether his reports contain such facts.Video recorded by Chitwood and Gloria then shows Boyce speaking with Bryanna Montgomery on the sidewalk. Boyce said he wanted to “explain the traffic stop” and seemed to indicate he wanted Bryanna Montgomery to move closer to the street for that purpose. It’s unclear why he couldn’t explain the traffic stop where they were standing, on the sidewalk. Bryanna Montgomery did not seem threatening, nor did she seem to be attempting to flee. However, when she refused to walk with Boyce toward the street, he grabbed her upper arm with one hand, the back of her neck with the other and threw her face-first to the ground, on the strip of grass between the sidewalk and the curb. While Wendt screamed and implored officers to get off of her, and Jovan told Bryanna to hold still and calm down, both Chitwood and Boyce knelt on her back while securing her in handcuffs. She said once that she couldn’t breathe. Once they had her cuffed, Chitwood asked whether she needed an ambulance; she said no. They then walked her to a patrol car and she voluntarily got in the back seat, saying, “I weigh like 20 times less than both of you. You don’t need two grown men on my (expletive) back.”A few minutes later, a DCSO Sergeant arrived and walked Jovan toward his garage door, away from the SPPD officers. Jovan said he explained the situation to the sergeant and the sergeant unlocked the handcuffs on him and instructed SPPD officers to get Bryanna out of the squad car and unlock the handcuffs on her. Boyce told Bryanna that he would mail a ticket, and the police all left.Bryanna Montgomery then received tickets in the mail for failure to obey a traffic sign, for following too closely and for driving without her driver’s license on her person. Jovan Montgomery received a ticket for following Boyce too closely. That ticket indicates the violation happened on Main Street in Sun Prairie, even though all three vehicles avoided Main Street due to road construction.“This was a big deal”After the police had all left, Wendt and Jovan Montgomery took Bryanna to the emergency room, where she was treated for a racing heart rate, difficulty breathing, and abrasions to her legs. A little over a week later, during an interview with Madison365, Jovan seemed more traumatized than Bryanna was.“You’re supposed to de-escalate,” he said of his expectations of police. “You’re supposed to make sure people feel safe. I don’t even feel safe in front of police anymore.”He said he remembers hearing Bryanna say, “We’re not doing this today” to Boyce, and thinking she meant, “we’re not doing what you guys just did a week ago with Corey (Ruiz),” referring to the man shot and killed by Madison police on July 22, just a week before this encounter. “That’s not gonna happen. You’re not gonna do any violence or murder somebody in front of our house. I’m no threat.”Bryanna said she felt more disrespected than fearful.“You’re not even talking to me like I’m a human,” Bryanna said. “You’re talking to me like you own me.”“It just seemed like it was just a really bad day, and it seemed like the deputy wanted to make it a worse day,” Jovan Montgomery said. “I really feel that I was being targeted… as a Black man.”The family has filed complaints with both DCSO and SPPD. They have also consulted an attorney and are considering a lawsuit against both agencies.“I want a public apology towards me and for my child, because a routine traffic stop should not turn into where people are being thrown around like rag dolls or like we’re slaves,” Jovan said. “Those days are over with.”Wendt said she wants “some accountability that something’s going to change. There’s going to have to be some monetary compensation, too. This is trauma… what we want is acknowledgement. We want Byranna’s case to mean something for change. This was a big deal.”Please note: This story was provided to CNN Wire by an affiliate and does not contain original CNN reporting. This content carries a strict local market embargo. If you share the same market as the contributor of this article, you may not use it on any platform.
Read Next Story