Skip to main content

Hundreds of Instagram accounts push graphic real-life violence to millions

Matthew Stevens didn’t want to watch anyone die.

Late one night in February, the 19-year-old was in bed, scrolling on Instagram. Amid his feed’s usual mix of memes and movie clips, the app recommended a video of two men fighting – a brutal, graphic brawl that left him shaken.

He quickly scrolled past the post, but the Instagram algorithm kept showing him more.

“Every time you scrolled, it just kept going further and further with more graphic and violent fights,” Stevens said. Online, users worldwide reported the same experience: On Feb. 26, their feeds were suddenly filled with video after video showing real human suffering and death.

Instagram’s parent company, Meta, apologized after the incident, which affected Instagram Reels, the company’s short-form video feature similar to TikTok. A spokesperson said they’d “fixed an error that caused some users to see content in their Instagram Reels feed that should not have been recommended.”

But Feb. 26 was the tip of the iceberg. Violent and shocking content often referred to as “gore” remains easily accessible on Instagram today, a CBS News investigation found.

Instagram Reels hosts a thriving gray‑market economy driven by graphic violence, people who post violent content on Instagram told CBS News. Banned advertisers — gambling sites, crypto apps, porn agencies — evade Meta’s ad rules by paying graphic-content pages to embed illicit promotions among the gore.

Between February and April 2025, CBS News identified more than 600 Instagram accounts that post real-world violence packaged into short-form meme videos. The accounts post horrific videos that are viewed by millions of users –  some of whom told CBS News they didn’t want to see them.

Even elementary school students were exposed to violence on Instagram, said Nate Webb, a school counselor in Tooele, Utah. On Feb. 26, he said some fourth graders were joking around about the content they were seeing.

“It was shocking to me that such graphic content disturbs me, and I’m a full-grown adult, that didn’t really faze some of those kids,” he said. “It made me wonder, how much more are you seeing and how much more often are you seeing it?”

The violent imagery can “saturate” a person, overwhelming the brain and even leading to PTSD-like symptoms, said Laura Van Dernoot Lipsky, an expert on trauma who founded the Trauma Stewardship Institute.

“There are no words to describe how profound and damaging and powerful that impact is, even if we’re just bringing it down to neuroscience and a brain perspective,” she said.

It can be especially troubling if someone is shown gore content involuntarily, according to Joanne Lloyd, a researcher at the University of Wolverhampton in England.

“The people that seem to be most distressed by it were the people who had not gone looking for it,” Lloyd said.

CBS News interviewed Instagram users around the world and reviewed dozens of social media posts complaining about graphic content on the platform. Each said the Instagram algorithm showed them horrific violence they didn’t want to see — both before and after the incident in February.

Meta declined to make anyone available for interview for this story, but said in a statement that it invests heavily in safety and security, with 40,000 staff and more than $30 billion dedicated to those issues over the last decade. The company said it restricts the monetization of violent content and adds warning labels, aiming to shield teens and those who don’t want to see graphic posts – while acknowledging that not all disturbing material meets their threshold for removal.

In addition, Meta said it expanded teen protections in an October policy update, nowautomatically hiding more graphic content such as dead bodies, medical injuries, and dyinganimals. Teens will also be blocked from following or interacting with accounts that share age-inappropriate material, including those linked to adult platforms such as OnlyFans.

Target se disculpa por disfraz de payaso para niños de Halloween tras la polémica

Target se disculpó el lunes y anunció que había retirado de la venta un disfraz de Halloween que representaba a un payaso de circo que, según los críticos, evocaba la práctica de pintarse la cara de negro y los espectáculos de juglares.El producto, vendido como el “Disfraz de payaso de circo para niños que brilla bajo luz negra” para Halloween, provocó una fuerte reacción en las redes sociales, y algunos consumidores afirmaron que se parecía a una caricatura racista.“Como empresa, sabemos que nos equivocamos y lo lamentamos profundamente”, declaró Target en un comunicado. “El disfraz es ofensivo y nunca debió haber formado parte de nuestro catálogo. Ya no está a la venta”.Este es el último quebradero de cabeza para la imagen pública de la cadena minorista estadounidense, que intenta enderezar el rumbo tras un periodo de bajas ventas.La compañía también ha recibido críticas por la gestión de los productos de su Colección Orgullo 2023 y por los cambios en sus iniciativas de diversidad, equidad e inclusión tras el regreso del presidente Donald Trump a la Casa Blanca.Target declinó hacer comentarios sobre quién diseñó el producto —que se vendió bajo las marcas de temporada Hyde y EEK Boutique— o sobre el proceso por el cual se aprobó su venta.En su comunicado, Target afirmó que estaba “analizando detenidamente cómo ocurrió esto y qué cambios son necesarios”.Algunos compradores afroamericanos, que se sintieron marginados tras los retrocesos en materia de diversidad, equidad e inclusión (DEI) de Target en 2025, expresaron su decepción el lunes.Sheletta Brundidge, empresaria del área de Minneapolis, considera que el disfraz es una consecuencia indirecta de la decisión sobre DEI. “Redujeron la diversidad”, indicó, “así que, ¿quién está ahora para decir: “Esto está mal”?”.En su comunicado, Target reconoció que el disfraz era “especialmente hiriente para nuestros clientes, miembros del equipo y socios negros”.Aunque Hyde y EEK son marcas propiedad de Target, sus productos se han revendido en sitios web de minoristas como Walmart y Amazon, así como en la plataforma Etsy. Reuters no encontró el artículo en cuestión en dichos sitios.Una portavoz de Walmart declaró desconocer que se estuviera vendiendo. Amazon y Etsy no respondieron de inmediato a las solicitudes de comentarios.Target, que ha encadenado dos trimestres consecutivos con excelentes resultados, está empezando a ver los frutos de sus esfuerzos por bajar los precios y renovar su mercancía, y su nuevo director ejecutivo, Michael Fiddelke, ya ha recibido elogios de Wall Street.Pero la compañía, que no puede competir con Walmart y Costco en precio, tiene poco margen de error en lo que respecta a fallos de gestión o de imagen, declaró Brett Husslein, analista de Morningstar.“Ahora que Target empieza a recuperar terreno en la recuperación de su reputación de marca, este es precisamente el tipo de cosas que quieren evitar”, comentó, y añadió que cualquier obstáculo, ya sea de índole visual, administrativa o macroeconómica, “podría provocar mayores pérdidas de cuota de mercado”.Las acciones de Target subieron un 2,7 % en la sesión de la tarde.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story