Skip to main content

Dr. Anthony Fauci on pandemics, partisan critics, and ‘the psyche of the country’

▶ Watch Video: Dr. Anthony Fauci on pandemics and partisan attacks

Growing up on 13th Avenue in Dyker Heights, Brooklyn, in the 1940s and ’50s, Anthony “Tony” Fauci was the precocious son of the corner pharmacist. “They called him Doc,” he said. “The pharmacist back then served as the neighborhood psychiatrist, marriage counselor. So, it was serving the community.”

The Fauci Pharmacy is long-gone. But beneath the calm façade Dr. Anthony Fauci has shown the world for more than 50 years, he is still – as he says – “Brooklyn tough.”

Did he get into fights every now and then? “How could you not?” he said.

“How’d you do?” LaPook asked.

“Well, I’m not the biggest guy in the world.”

“But at 5’7”, you were the captain of the basketball team. How did you do that?

“I was very fast and I had a really good shot,” Fauci said.

“What killed your NBA career?”

“I found out that a very fast, good shooting point guard who’s 5’7″ will always get destroyed by a point guard who’s 6’3″. That became very clear!” Fauci laughed. “So, I said, ‘Oh, let me just settle for science, whatever.'”

There are millions today who owe their lives to the work of the man who “settled” for science. And as he chronicles in his new memoir, “On Call: A Doctor’s Journey in Public Service,” Dr. Fauci’s career treating infectious diseases at the National Institutes of Health has been bookended by the two great pandemics of our time: AIDS and COVID-19.

When it first widely appeared in the early 1980s, a diagnosis of HIV/AIDS was a death sentence.

Dr. LaPook asked, “Looking at your background, you were brought up in Brooklyn in the ’40s, kind of a conservative family. You might not necessarily predict that you would then go on to treat a group of people who were kind of shunned by society. What went into that?”

“What it was that, one of the predominant themes in my home, which was fortified with the Jesuit education, was empathy,” Dr. Fauci replied. “My father was quite conservative, you know, an Eisenhower-type Republican, as was my mother. But my father was very, very much guided by empathy for anybody.”

on-call-cover-viking-900.jpg

Viking Press

Although empathy for AIDS patients was in short supply, and he was criticized early on, Dr. Fauci used his position at the NIH to lobby the White House for funding – and for national attention.

He worked with seven presidents on AIDS, bird flu, swine flu, Ebola, Zika, and COVID. An AIDS program started with George W. Bush has saved an estimated 25 million lives worldwide. 

With Bill Clinton, Dr. Fauci established the NIH’s Vaccine Research Center, which laid the groundwork for the record-breaking development of COVID vaccines during the Trump administration.

But that last collaboration hit a wall on April 3, 2020, the day President Trump held a press briefing in which he said the CDC was now recommending that people wear masks, and then he added, “This is voluntary. I don’t think I’m going to be doing it.”

Dr. Fauci said, “I was deeply disturbed by that, because he had the opportunity as the leader of the country with a very strong, devoted following to say, ‘The CDC has recommended masks, and I’m gonna wear a mask, because masks are gonna protect me and protect others.’ That really was a missed opportunity, because that was a signal to his devoted followers that you don’t really have to listen to the CDC, you don’t have to listen to the public health messages.”

As the country’s willingness to follow public health advice largely split along party lines, Dr. Fauci came under attack, and he received death threats.

Had that ever happened before? “No, not credible death threats where a person is arrested who was clearly intending to kill you,” Dr. Fauci said. “And that’s happened at least twice. We’re acting like, we have a virus that’s the common enemy and we’re fighting with each other.”

Earlier this month, Dr. Fauci was called before a Republican-led congressional committee to discuss pandemic origins and preparedness. But things quickly spun out of control, as Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.), said, “What this committee should be doing … we should be recommending you to be prosecuted.”

Dr. LaPook asked, “How did we go, as a country, from absolutely adoring Jonas Salk, who helped develop the polio vaccine, he was a national hero, to Dr. Anthony Fauci having to have security details to stop people from killing him?”

“It’s a reflection of the psyche of the country,” Dr. Fauci replied. “If the purpose of the hearing is to figure out how we can do better to prevent and respond to and prepare for the next pandemic, well, that [attack] doesn’t even begin to contribute to that.”

dr-anthony-fauci-1280.jpg
Dr. Anthony Fauci. 

CBS News

One of the deepest points of controversy is the still-unknown origin of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that caused the COVID-19 outbreak. Because the NIH has funded research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China, there are accusations that American tax dollars could have paid to create SARS-CoV-2 through genetic manipulation, what’s called “gain of function.”

Dr. LaPook asked if this was biochemically and genetically possible. “No,” Dr. Fauci replied. “When you have a virus, if you’re gonna manipulate it in a way to make it a ‘dangerous’ virus, you have to start off with a precursor virus that’s close enough to the virus that you ultimately make, that it is molecularly possible to do that. What is absolutely 100% certain is that the viruses that were studied under the NIH grant, for the kinds of experiments that were done, molecularly were so far removed from SARS-CoV-2 that they could not have turned it into SARS-CoV-2 even if they tried, which they obviously didn’t do.

“But it was just so, what we call, phylogenetically distant … what it means is that, evolutionarily it’s so far, it would take 20 years of evolution to get it there. And that’s something that just slips between the cracks when people talk about it,” Dr. Fauci said. “What we’re talking about is what the NIH funded, was viruses that could not possibly have done that.”

COVID origins aside, Dr. Fauci has been subjected to other accusations, such as getting money from pharmaceutical companies. Dr. LaPook asked, “You have been offered money to leave the NIH, right, and join, say, pharma, right?”

“Right, or private equity,” Dr. Fauci replied.

“How many times your current salary have you been offered, about?”

“So, at the time that I was getting offered it, I was making $125,000, $200,000. Then I would get offered a job that would get me $5, $6, $7 million a year.”

“So, why didn’t you take it?”

“Because I really felt what I was doing was having an impact on what I cared about, which was the health of the country and, indirectly, the health of the world,” Dr. Fauci said. “And to me, that is priceless.”

“There’ve been ups, there’ve been downs. It’s been a lot of friction recently. Any regrets?”

“No. No,” Dr. Fauci replied. “I mean, when you say regrets, any regrets of what I did? My choices? No. Could we have done things better on multiple points, inflection points along the way? Of course. ‘Cause we’re not perfect. You try your best and you realize with humility that you’re not perfect. And you don’t pretend to be perfect. But you go with what your best is, and then if you make a mistake, you try to correct it.”

      
For more info:

     
Story produced by Ed Forgotson. Editor: George Pozderec. 

Luigi Mangione in discussions about possible guilty plea, sources say

▶ Watch Video: Luigi Mangione could plead guilty in federal case Friday, sources say Luigi Mangione, accused in the 2024 killing of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson, is in discussions about a possible plea deal on federal charges ahead of a court appearance Friday in New York City, sources familiar with the matter told CBS News.Mangione, 28, is set to appear at an 11 a.m. conference in U.S. District Court in Manhattan. That meeting is taking place after prosecutors and the defense team sent a letter to federal court Tuesday requesting Friday's conference. CBS News New York's Alice Gainer will be inside the courtroom Friday with the latest developments. Plea discussions between federal prosecutors and defense attorneys have been ongoing and it's unclear if an agreement has been reached, sources told CBS News."I expect plea negotiations to happen in every case, or certainly most cases," legal expert Richard Schoenstein said. Attorneys for Mangione have not responded to CBS News New York's request for comment. A spokesperson for the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York also declined to comment. Mangione faces both federal and state charges in connection with Thompson's death. He has pleaded not guilty in both trials.The federal charges carry a potential maximum life sentence, which Mangione could still face even if a federal plea deal is reached. "In the federal system, you don't agree to a sentence as part of a plea deal. You agree to a plea and the crime, and then it has to go to a sentencing hearing in front of the judge," Schoenstein said."Maybe both parties try to, either by a binding agreement or by a suggestion to the court, say, 'We want some sort of reduced sentence, less than the life in federal prison that was the possibility here,'" CBS News legal contributor Jessica Levinson said.If a plea deal is reached, it could have an impact on his state trial, which is set to begin next month. That's because of potential double jeopardy concerns. Double jeopardy refers to a law which says "a person may not be twice prosecuted for the same offense," although a number of exceptions are listed. "I would expect the defense to make some sort of motion to preclude further prosecution of the state case on the grounds that it is double jeopardy," Schoenstein said. "I think the question of whether or not it would be double jeopardy is open and complicated and subject to debate."That's because the federal charges have to do with stalking and interstate charges, whereas the state charges are for second-degree murder, a weapons charge, and a forged instrument charge."So the weapons and forged instrument charges would not be resolved by the federal plea, and arguably the intentional killing charge would not be resolved. I do think there's a serious question as to whether this would be double jeopardy," Schoenstein said. "In New York state, there's more robust protections for defendants around the double jeopardy laws. And so that could be a real issue here, at least one that would merit litigation, if not dismissal," CBS News legal analyst Caroline Polisi said.Schoenstein said a federal plea deal would "put some pressure on state prosecutors to reach a deal of their own, or to become part of the deal that is being negotiated between the feds and the defendant, and therefore it could resolve the case on a negotiated level."Schoenstein said it could also impact the defense strategy if the state case does go forward, "because if it does go forward he no longer has to worry about a federal trial down the road."Legal experts say the case's national attention and the supporters Mangione has gained could be a factor in the feds wanting to make a deal."You have a raised possibility of what we call juror nullification, wherein a jury gets seated and there's someone in there that just, regardless of hearing any of the evidence, is never going to vote to convict Luigi Mangione," Polisi said.It was unclear what charges Mangione would plead guilty to on Friday, and he could reverse his decision at the last minute.The start of his federal trial, if it moves forward, is set for January.
Read Next Story