Skip to main content

Voting Rights Act Fast Facts

(CNN) — Here is a look at the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which serves to protect and enforce the 14th and 15th Amendments. It was enacted in response to voter suppression in the 1960s by state governments, local governments and law enforcement.

Important sections

Original jurisdictions: Alabama, Alaska, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina and Virginia. Also, subdivisions, mostly counties, in Arizona, Hawaii, Idaho and North Carolina.

Jurisdictions are made based on a formula containing two elements: If less than 50% of the voting age population is registered to vote by November 1, 1964, or if less than 50% voted in the 1964 presidential election. It also guarantees the right to register and vote to citizens with “limited English proficiency.”

Section 2: States the right to vote cannot be denied on the basis of race or color.

Section 3: Upholds the ability to enforce the 15th Amendment.

Section 4: Says citizen cannot be denied the right to vote for failed compliance with devices such as literacy tests. It also designates the formulated jurisdictions outlined in Section 5. The requirement for preclearance of voting changes was ruled unconstitutional in a 2013 US Supreme Court decision. “The effect of the Shelby County decision is that the jurisdictions identified by the coverage formula in Section 4(b) no longer need to seek preclearance for the new voting changes, unless they are covered by a separate court order entered under Section 3(c) of the Voting Rights Act.”

Section 5: This section freezes “changes in election practices or procedures in covered jurisdictions” until the new procedures have been subjected to review. Review can only be done by the US Attorney General or by filing a lawsuit before the US District Court for the District of Columbia. Yet Section 5 is basically unenforceable as there is no longer a preclearance requirement in Section 4.

Read More: America has a long history of resisting multiracial democracy.

Timeline

March 7, 1965 – Bloody Sunday – About 600 non-violent voting rights marchers heading to Montgomery, Alabama’s state capital, are attacked by state troopers in Selma.

March 15, 1965 – President Lyndon Johnson, in a speech before a joint session of Congress says: “There is no constitutional issue here. The command of the Constitution is plain. There is no moral issue. It is wrong, deadly wrong, to deny any of your fellow Americans the right to vote in this country.”

August 6, 1965 – Is signed into law by President Johnson to protect and enforce the 15th Amendment.

1970 – Congress extends provisions for five years, changing the formula in Section 4 to reflect 1968 (instead of 1964). Coverage is added in jurisdictions within 10 more states: Alaska, Arizona, California, Connecticut, Idaho, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York and Wyoming. Connecticut, Idaho, Maine, Massachusetts and Wyoming win “bailout” lawsuits.

1975 – Congress extends provisions for seven years, changes the formula to 1972 and broadens the discrimination description as also encompassing American Indians, Asian Americans, Alaskan Natives or people of Spanish heritage. This addition to the formula essentially covers Alaska, Arizona and Texas, and includes parts of California, Florida, Michigan, New York, North Carolina and South Dakota.

1982 – Congress extends the special provisions in Section 4 for 25 years, but makes no changes.

2006 – Congress renews special provisions and extends the act until 2031.

June 25, 2013 – The US Supreme Court decides (5-4) that formulated jurisdictions under Section 5 no longer have to have new voting laws pre-cleared by the attorney general or the federal district court in the District of Columbia. Chief Justice John Roberts explains that “our country has changed” and the formula “no longer characterize(s) voting in the covered jurisdictions.”

February 11, 2015 – An amendment to the Voting Rights Act (VRA) of 1964 is introduced to the House of Representatives. The Voting Rights Amendment Act of 2015 is focused on updating a portion of the law after the US Supreme Court struck down an “outdated” portion of VRA that protected racial discrimination in voting.

March 7, 2015 – President Barack Obama signs legislation awarding the Congressional Gold Medal “to the Foot Soldiers who participated in the Bloody Sunday, Turnaround Tuesday, or the final Selma to Montgomery Voting Rights March in March of 1965, which served as a catalyst for the Voting Rights Act.”

September 12, 2018 – The report, “An Assessment of Minority Voting Rights Access in the United States,” is released by the US Commission on Civil Rights. The bipartisan agency concludes that new state laws are making it more difficult for minorities to vote. It also notes that the Justice Department has done less to challenge those discriminatory laws since the Supreme Court struck down a core element of the 1965 Voting Rights Act in 2013.

December 6, 2019 – The House of Representatives votes to pass the Voting Rights Advancement Act of 2019 (introduced February 26). The bill “establishes new criteria for determining which states and political subdivisions must obtain preclearance before changes to voting practices in these areas may take effect.”

July 22, 2020 – The Voting Rights Advancement Act of 2019 is introduced in the Senate. It is renamed the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act after the July 17 death of the congressman and civil rights leader.

July 1, 2021 – The US Supreme Court decides (6-3) that two provisions of an Arizona voting law that restrict how ballots can be cast do not violate the Voting Rights Act that bars regulations that result in racial discrimination. The ruling by the conservative-majority court will limit the ability of minorities to challenge state laws in the future that they say are discriminatory under the Voting Rights Act.

February 7, 2022 – In a 5-4 decision, the US Supreme Court allows a congressional map drawn by Alabama Republicans to remain in place, freezing a lower court ruling that said the map likely violates the Voting Rights Act by diluting the political power of African American voters.

June 8, 2023 – In a 5-4 decision, the US Supreme Court upholds a key section of the Voting Rights Act, ordering Alabama officials to redraw the state’s congressional map to allow an additional Black majority district.

August 1, 2024 – The 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals narrows the scope of the Voting Rights Act for redistricting cases in a large swath of the South, ruling against the Justice Department and voters of color who had challenged Galveston, Texas’s county commission map for how it had been redrawn to dismantle a district where minorities made up a majority of the population.

May 14, 2025 – The 8th US Circuit Court of Appeals shuts down the ability of private individuals to bring Voting Rights Act lawsuits challenging election policies that allegedly discriminate based on race in several states. The ruling covers the seven midwestern states covered in the St. Louis-based Circuit. The opinion means that in those states, only the Justice Department can bring lawsuits enforcing a key provision of the Voting Rights Act.

April 29, 2026 – In a case examining Louisiana’s congressional plan, the Supreme Court rules 6-3 that a map that had created a second majority-minority district in the state because of a Voting Rights Act challenge amounted to an unconstitutional use of race. The ruling essentially means evidence of a discriminatory motive may be necessary to win Voting Rights Act-based challenges.

The-CNN-Wire
™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.

Ohio’s GOP governor calls Trump’s plans to deport Haitians a ‘mistake’

▶ Watch Video: Extended interview: Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine on Trump's plan to deport Hatians COLUMBUS, Ohio — Republican Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine told CBS News the Trump administration's plan to ramp up arrests and deportations of Haitian migrants is a "mistake," arguing the move could bruise the state's economy and risk putting Haitians in danger in their home country.More than 300,000 people from Haiti are set this week to lose Temporary Protected Status, a humanitarian immigration program that protects them from deportation and allows them to work, after the Supreme Court upheld the Trump administration's plan to end the policy for Haitians. Immigration and Customs Enforcement has drawn up plans to launch a deportation blitz focused on Haitian migrants as early as this week, CBS News reported Sunday.The operations could focus in part on the thousands of Haitians who live in Ohio, many of whom have settled in the city of Springfield in recent years. During the 2024 campaign, President Trump claimed, without evidence, that Haitian immigrants in the city were eating cats and dogs.In an interview on Monday in Columbus, DeWine said the planned deportation operations would be "a blow to Springfield" and "a blow to the state of Ohio.""These are people who have helped Springfield really come back," DeWine said, pointing to Haitians who have filled jobs and opened businesses in an economically challenged city. "The Haitians who are living there and employed there, they came there to work, and they came there because there were jobs that were not being filled by other people."DeWine also pointed to the dire security situation in Haiti, a deeply impoverished country that has dealt with years of political instability, with gangs controlling large swaths of territory. The country is mired in "virtual chaos," the governor said, with "no semblance of government," leading the U.S. State Department to warn Americans not to travel there.The governor predicted that many Haitians would go to some other country rather than return."Haiti is hell today. So you'd be sending people … back to hell," DeWine said. "Very few of these Haitians will voluntarily go back to Haiti. If they have to leave, they'll go someplace else. They want to work. They want to support their family. They don't want to go back to Haiti."Haiti has been designated under Temporary Protected Status since 2010, when the island nation was devastated by an earthquake. That status has been renewed periodically since then, allowing hundreds of thousands of Haitian migrants to remain in the United States. In 2024, the Biden administration extended the status, pointing to the country's "violence and instability."The Department of Homeland Security moved to terminate TPS for Haitians last year, concluding it was "not in the national interest" and arguing migration from Haiti poses a "risk" to the U.S. DHS also said the "environmental situation in Haiti has improved enough that it is safe for Haitian citizens to return home."Around 334,000 Haitians had temporary protected status as of last year, not including people who also have green cards, according to federal data.The decision was part of a broader effort by the Trump administration to wind down TPS for several countries, like Syria and Venezuela. DHS argues the status — which offers reprieve for people whose home countries are unsafe due to violence or natural disasters — was meant to be temporary, but has turned into a "defacto amnesty program.""What we would say now is it's closing time which means you don't have to go home, but you can't stay here," DHS said in a statement to CBS News over the weekend, encouraging people who are about to lose their protected status to self-deport for $2,600 and a "free flight home."The move to revoke protections for Haitians drew lawsuits, and a judge blocked the move in February, calling it "arbitrary and capricious" and partly "rooted in racial animus." The Trump administration fought the case to the Supreme Court, which ruled in late June that the government could move forward with plans to end Temporary Protected Status for Haiti and Syria. The decision was set to be formalized on Monday.DeWine has pushed back on Mr. Trump's stance toward Haitian migrants in the past. In a 2024 interview with CBS News, he called the president's claims about Haitians eating pets "something that came up on the internet, and the internet can be quite crazy sometimes." He noted that local officials have said there is no evidence to back up the claims.At the time, DeWine said the influx of as many as 15,000 immigrants in and around a city of less than 60,000 residents has caused some challenges, including to the local healthcare system. But he said Haitian migrants have "filled a lot of jobs" and "work very, very hard." 
Read Next Story