Skip to main content

ACLU-DC wants to work with police to ensure safe, constitutional election protests

With 47 days until Election Day, the head of the ACLU for D.C. sent a letter to the chiefs of local and federal law enforcement agencies “to open the lines of communication regarding free speech rights,” ahead of protests over the election, certification of election results and presidential inaugurations.

Thursday’s letter to the chiefs of D.C., Capitol and Park Police, as well as the head of the Secret Service and D.C. National Guard is from Scott Michelman, legal director for ACLU of the District of Columbia.

“As you know, Washington, D.C. is a special location for the public expression of views, as it is the place where the people of our nation can speak in closest proximity to where their elected leaders formulate laws and policies on their behalf,” wrote Michelman. “The ACLU-D. C. believes we all share a strong interest in ensuring, during what might be a tense period, that people can exercise their constitutional right to express themselves, here in the District.”

Michelman said the actions that law enforcement took on Jan. 6, 2021, “played a significant role in preserving the integrity of our democratic processes.”

“It should go without saying that the ACLU-D. C. does not believe that the First Amendment even remotely supports a right to storm the Capitol (or any other government building) or to assault members of Congress or Capitol Police (or anyone),” wrote Michelman.

However, he said he hoped law enforcement would remember other demonstrations in D.C. that were “lawful and constitutional, but (were) nonetheless suppressed via unconstitutional conduct by law enforcement.”

Michelman cited the 2020 protest at Lafayette Square, where residents called for police reform after George Floyd’s murder; the 2017 Inauguration Day protest; as well as the 2002 World Bank protests in Pershing Park.

Michelman said he hopes police will remember the settlements they were able to reach in earlier protests.

The cases resulted in significant policy reforms that he said “protect demonstrators’ rights to express themselves — such as restrictions on dispersals and arrests, identification requirements for officers, and other safeguards against ‘guilt-by-association’ tactics in which the unlawful conduct of a few individuals within a crowd is used to justify widespread detentions or uses of force.”

With Election Day fast approaching, Michelman encouraged the chiefs and their legal advisers to contact him directly.

“There may be disputes about the First Amendment or related rights that we can work together to resolve through discussion rather than litigation,” said Michelman.

Get breaking news and daily headlines delivered to your email inbox by signing up here.

© 2024 WTOP. All Rights Reserved. This website is not intended for users located within the European Economic Area.

Maryland court rules Democratic-backed redistricting amendment cannot go on November ballot

A Maryland court has ruled against a proposed constitutional amendment that could have paved the way for Democrats to redraw the state's congressional districts ahead of the 2028 elections. The ruling Wednesday by a judge in the state's capital city marks another setback in Democrats' national attempts to counter a Republican redistricting movement pushed by President Donald Trump ahead of this year's elections. The judge ruled that the amendment cannot appear on the November ballot, but he paused the effect of that ruling to allow for an appeal to the state Supreme Court. Democrats already control seven of Maryland's eight congressional seats. Democratic Gov. Wes Moore called lawmakers into a special session in August with a goal of making it easier to claim that final seat. An amendment referred to the ballot by lawmakers seeks to sidestep a court ruling that struck down a previous Democratic redistricting plan in 2022. It would declare that a constitutional requirement for districts to be compact and take into account “natural boundaries” applies only to state legislative districts, not congressional ones.
Read Next Story