Skip to main content

DC’s new top cop reflects on handling of 2002 protests

WASHINGTON — Moments after Mayor Muriel Bowser announced his appointment as D.C.’s new police chief, Peter Newsham addressed criticism of his handling of the 2002 World Bank protests in Pershing Park.

As a result of that incident, the District ended up settling with nearly 400 protesters and bystanders — who had sued over mass arrests — for more than $8 million.

Related Stories

The crowd had not been warned to disperse before the roundup. Some were held for more than 24 hours before being released and some were hogtied.

“My decision at the time was a decision that I thought was in the best interest of the District of Columbia and of public safety,” said Newsham, who at the time was an assistant chief in charge at the protest site.

“My sense from what I had seen prior to that group entering the park was that potentially, they could leave the park, continue to destroy property and then maybe get into some interactions with the police where folks could get hurt.”

He added, “So that’s why I made the decision. It was subsequently determined that that was not the right decision.”

At word of his appointment, the Partnership for Civil Justice, which represented the Pershing Park protesters, pointed to Newsham’s “constitutional violations” toward protesters on Inauguration Day.

“At the protests at Donald Trump’s inauguration just one month ago, [Newsham] plainly acted in willful violation of the law and engaged in yet another illegal mass dragnet arrest,” said Mara Verheyden-Hilliard, executive director of the Partnership for Civil Justice Fund, in a statement.

Bowser, in response, pointed to “our fellow Washingtonians who participated in a grand jury and sent down 214 indictments” on rioting charges.

Amid violent incidents that damaged property and injured officers during inaugural protests, Newsham said his department successfully applied the lessons it learned in 2002.

“We had thousands of people who peacefully came to Washington, D.C., to exercise their First Amendment right — their grievance with the government,” he said, “and we actually welcomed that as an agency.”

National Museum of the American Latino to be housed in historic Smithsonian building

The Smithsonian Institution has decided to put the National Museum of the American Latino into an existing, historic building, rather than constructing a new one. The Smithsonian Board of Regents on Monday designated the Arts and Industries Building, a 145-year-old redbrick Victorian structure located between the Smithsonian Castle and the Hirshhorn Museum, as the permanent site of the National Museum of the American Latino, which Congress authorized in 2020. In 2022, the Smithsonian narrowed its survey for permanent locations for the National Museum of the American Latino and the American Women's History Museum to four locations near the National Mall on land owned by the National Park Service. The Arts and Industries Building, located at 900 Jefferson St. SW, was one of the four sites. New construction on National Park Service land would require congressional approval. However, since the Smithsonian already owns the Arts and Industries Building, the institution can place the National Museum of the American Latino in the existing building without additional legislation.
Read Next Story