Skip to main content

Lawmakers pump brakes on annual national car fee

A GOP proposal to create an annual $20 fee for all U.S. vehicles — which has been criticized by members of both parties as a national car tax — was pulled Wednesday from budget reconciliation legislation.

The chair of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, Rep. Sam Graves, a Republican representing Missouri’s 6th District, had proposed the annual registration fee to try to eventually phase out the federal gas tax.

But it was criticized by Republicans as well as Democrats.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer posted a short video that said, “Of all the crazy things Republicans want to do, now they want a car tax? Hell no.”

Graves on Wednesday amended budget reconciliation language to take out the $20 fee.

“It unfortunately became a political distraction that no longer centered around seriously addressing the problem,” he said. “While this provision goes away, the problem still remains — we have a broken highway trust fund.”

Graves had hoped the fee would start a movement away from the federal gas tax of 18.4 cents a gallon, which hasn’t been raised since 1993.

Federal gas tax revenue has been decreasing, in part because of the growth of electric vehicles, as well as the increase in more fuel-efficient vehicles.

The legislation still includes a $250 annual fee on EVs as well as a $100 fee on hybrids.

Before the $20 fee was pulled, Rep. Chris Deluzio, a Democrat representing Pennsylvania’s 17th District, criticized Republicans for supporting it.

“Republican members of this committee are trying to raise taxes on every car owner in America,” he said.

Congressional stories

GOP lawmakers on several committees are marking up legislation as part of President Donald Trump’s so-called “one big, beautiful bill.”

The provisions are a mix of deep spending cuts as well as measures designed to raise money to offset more than $4 trillion needed to extend Trump’s tax cuts from his first term.

Democrats charge that Republicans are effectively punishing everyday Americans with higher costs and reductions in federal services in order to pay for tax cuts to benefit the wealthy.

Republicans counter that the funding cuts are necessary to deal with a bloated federal government and the tax cuts will benefit a broad range of American taxpayers.

Get breaking news and daily headlines delivered to your email inbox by signing up here.

© 2025 WTOP. All Rights Reserved. This website is not intended for users located within the European Economic Area.

US judges reveal panic buttons, private security in chilling new reports about threats

Federal judges have varied their commutes, hired private security and fortified their homes, including with panic buttons, amid a barrage of threats and harassment in recent months that has left many of them anxious about their safety, according to two new studies. In an astonishing admission, one judge acknowledged considering an alternative ruling to avoid vitriol that could endanger the judge’s family. The federal judge, like some of the others interviewed for the studies, spoke to the authors on condition of anonymity. The reports follow a spike in threats against federal judges. “Security incidents of significant concern” increased 57% in the year that ended in September 2025 and were on pace to rise again this year, according to a March report by the agency that administers the U.S. court system. While some U.S. judges have spoken publicly about threats, the new studies by legal scholars at New York University, the University of California, Berkeley, and the Brennan Center for Justice are based on detailed testimony from dozens of judges. Together, they present a chilling portrait of a judicial branch under extreme stress.
Read Next Story