Skip to main content

Owner Snyder addresses ‘Redskins’ name dispute

ASHBURN, Va. (AP) – Washington Redskins owner Dan Snyder says respect goes both ways when it comes to the debate over the team’s nickname.

The man who ultimately gets to decide whether the name stays or goes offered his thoughts on the matter Tuesday in a letter to season-ticket holders, the first time he has addressed at length the change-the-name campaign that has picked up momentum this year.

The tone of the letter suggests that no change is under consideration.

“I’ve listened carefully to the commentary and perspectives on all sides, and I respect the feelings of those who are offended by the team name,” the letter states. “But I hope such individuals also try to respect what the name means, not only for all of us in the extended Washington Redskins family, but among Native Americans too.”

The letter recalls Snyder’s experience when he attended his first Redskins game at age 6 and cites polls and anecdotal evidence that indicate support for the name from Native Americans. It states that the original Boston Redskins had a Native American coach before the franchise relocated to Washington, even though research shows that it is unclear whether William “Lone Star” Dietz was an actual Indian or whether he stole the identity of a missing man from the Oglala Sioux tribe.

“The name was never a label,” Snyder’s letter states. “It was, and continues to be, a badge of honor.”

While there have been groups calling for a name change for decades, a series of events this year has put the Redskins on the defensive like never before. Snyder has hired Lanny Davis, an adviser in the Clinton White House who specializes in managing political crises, as an adviser on the matter. The letter released Tuesday shows more sensitivity than the owner’s last on-the-record comment on the topic, when he told USA Today in May: “We’ll never change the name. It’s that simple. NEVER – you can use caps.”

In recent months, local leaders in Washington and some members of Congress have called for a name change, and some media outlets have stopped using the name. It is also the subject of a long-running legal challenge from a group of American Indians seeking to block the team’s federal trademark protection.

Last week, President Barack Obama told The Associated Press that he would “think about changing” the name if he owned the team. This week, the NFL said it will meet with an Indian tribe that has been pushing for a change, and Commissioner Roger Goodell said Tuesday that the league needs to “carefully listen” to critics of the name and “make sure we’re doing what’s right.”

Goodell has said that it is ultimately Snyder’s call as to whether the name will be changed. For now, it appears the owner is not budging.

“I respect the opinions of those who disagree. I want them to know that I do hear them, and I will continue to listen and learn,” the letter states. “But we cannot ignore our 81 year history, or the strong feelings of most of our fans as well as Native Americans throughout the country. After 81 years, the team name `Redskins’ continues to hold the memories and meaning of where we came from, who we are, and who we want to be in the years to come.”

AP NFL website: www.pro32.ap.org

Follow Joseph White on Twitter: http://twitter.com/JGWhiteAP

Read the full letter from Dan Snyder:

Letter From Dan Snyder

AP NFL website: www.pro32.ap.org

Copyright 2013 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

US strikes Iran and Tehran fires back as hostilities flare again

WASHINGTON (AP) — The U.S. military hit targets in Iran on Tuesday and Tehran fired missiles and drones in response as hostilities flare once again in an intermittent war that has lasted more than six months. The U.S. strikes followed others on Sunday that abruptly ended a month without military action and threatened to fully reignite a conflict that has spiked global oil prices and posed political problems for Republicans in November's midterm congressional elections. The renewed fighting comes after President Donald Trump had appeared to pivot toward trying to bend Iran to his will through economic sanctions. “If the failed Nation of Iran retaliates for this very justified attack, they will be hit again at a much harder and higher level, but it will not be the biggest attack of them all, that is waiting in the wings,” Trump warned on social media. U.S. Central Command said the latest strikes were in response to Tehran trying to attack commercial ships and American forces in the Middle East. Trump offered an additional explanation, telling Fox News in a phone call that U.S. forces struck Iran's radars.
Read Next Story