Skip to main content

In the wake of the Meta youth mental health settlement, how will states spend the funds?

On Wednesday, Meta agreed to settle dozens of lawsuits from attorneys general across the country that claimed social media has caused a youth mental health crisis. Meta will pay at least $12.7 billion to the 47 states and territories bringing the suits over the next 10 years, with the total potentially rising to about $17.1 billion if other major social media companies agree to similar youth-safety measures.

Virginia will receive a guaranteed $353 million, Maryland will receive $327 million and D.C. is set to get up to $129 million under the agreement.

Now that the settlement is confirmed, questions are being asked about how the states and territories might invest the funds.

“I would suspect that some of it will be utilized for the larger public health dimension of these lawsuits because it’s all predicated upon minors’ mental health,” Virginia Tech professor and Director of the School of Communications Cayce Myers told WTOP. “What I would suspect going forward is that we see states emerging with a lot of restrictions around social media. Some of them have emergent bills that, they’re looking at this, particularly in states like California.”

Myers said from an operational standpoint, he expects across-the-board changes, particularly if other platforms, such as TikTok and YouTube, enact similar changes.

“That creates kind of a problem for social media companies because you have this patchwork of social media law that is going to reflect the legislatures in these individual states, whether or not they be very pro-business or pro-privacy or pro-regulation,” Myers said.

Should Congress get involved?

Related stories

“Congress has political interest in addressing it from a national standpoint,” Myers said. “The problem with Congress is that it’s hyperpolarized, and bipartisan support on most things is very difficult to come by.”

But, Myers said, the issue is a politically salient one for members of Congress, citing its popularity and public demand for more protections for minors.

“I think if anything could gain bipartisan support, protections from social media on minors would be something that you could get some agreement on,” Myers said. “How the details fold out is going to be the problem.”

Get breaking news and daily headlines delivered to your email inbox by signing up here.

© 2026 WTOP. All Rights Reserved. This website is not intended for users located within the European Economic Area.

National Museum of the American Latino to be housed in historic Smithsonian building

The Smithsonian Institution has decided to put the National Museum of the American Latino into an existing, historic building, rather than constructing a new one. The Smithsonian Board of Regents on Monday designated the Arts and Industries Building, a 145-year-old redbrick Victorian structure located between the Smithsonian Castle and the Hirshhorn Museum, as the permanent site of the National Museum of the American Latino, which Congress authorized in 2020. In 2022, the Smithsonian narrowed its survey for permanent locations for the National Museum of the American Latino and the American Women's History Museum to four locations near the National Mall on land owned by the National Park Service. The Arts and Industries Building, located at 900 Jefferson St. SW, was one of the four sites. New construction on National Park Service land would require congressional approval. However, since the Smithsonian already owns the Arts and Industries Building, the institution can place the National Museum of the American Latino in the existing building without additional legislation.
Read Next Story