Skip to main content

This ‘yes’ or ‘no’ question is on every single ballot across Virginia

Sign up for WTOP’s Election Desk weekly newsletter to stay up-to-date through Election Day 2024 with the latest developments in this historic presidential election cycle.

Voters across Virginia will see different candidates for the U.S. House and other positions on their ballot based on where they live. But one thing every single voter across the state will see regardless of where they are located is a “yes” or “no” question that would amend the state’s Constitution.

It is related to tax relief for surviving spouses of soldiers who were killed.

“This is the constitutional amendment to correct a gap that was created under previous language,” said Democratic State Sen. Jeremy McPike.

McPike said, if approved, the amendment would essentially close a loophole, expanding a property tax exemption to all surviving spouses of soldiers who have died in the line of duty.

Currently, the state Constitution allows property tax exemptions for the primary residence of surviving spouses of veterans who were “killed in action.”

“We afford the property tax exemption for families that have members that were killed in action, but that does include those who ‘died in the line of duty,'” McPike explained.

If a service member “dies in the line of duty” — such as in a training exercise or a helicopter crash — the surviving spouse currently doesn’t receive the tax benefit because it isn’t technically classified as “killed in action.”

“When a service member dies in training, their surviving spouse does not qualify,” McPike said. “This is trying to close that gap in our Constitution to help the dozens of families that unfortunately lost their loved ones in the line of duty, but don’t qualify.”

A “yes” vote supports amending the language in the Virginia Constitution to expand the tax exemption, while a “no” vote opposes it.

In order for a constitutional amendment to be placed on Virginia’s ballot, the amendment must first pass through both the state Senate and House of Delegates in two consecutive sessions.

The amendment was passed in both chambers in February 2023 and then again in February 2024.

Get breaking news and daily headlines delivered to your email inbox by signing up here.

© 2024 WTOP. All Rights Reserved. This website is not intended for users located within the European Economic Area.

Maryland court rules Democratic-backed redistricting amendment cannot go on November ballot

A Maryland court has ruled against a proposed constitutional amendment that could have paved the way for Democrats to redraw the state's congressional districts ahead of the 2028 elections. The ruling Wednesday by a judge in the state's capital city marks another setback in Democrats' national attempts to counter a Republican redistricting movement pushed by President Donald Trump ahead of this year's elections. The judge ruled that the amendment cannot appear on the November ballot, but he paused the effect of that ruling to allow for an appeal to the state Supreme Court. Democrats already control seven of Maryland's eight congressional seats. Democratic Gov. Wes Moore called lawmakers into a special session in August with a goal of making it easier to claim that final seat. An amendment referred to the ballot by lawmakers seeks to sidestep a court ruling that struck down a previous Democratic redistricting plan in 2022. It would declare that a constitutional requirement for districts to be compact and take into account “natural boundaries” applies only to state legislative districts, not congressional ones.
Read Next Story