Skip to main content

Future of driverless vehicles, robotaxis to be debated by DC Council

D.C. could take a step toward allowing autonomous vehicles, including robotaxis, to operate on city streets.

The D.C. Council’s Committee on Transportation and the Environment will hold a public hearing Monday that could lay the groundwork for companies operating autonomous vehicles, or AVs, in the District.

Related stories

Until now, companies including Waymo and Zoox have been participating in a pilot program that requires human drivers to be in the vehicles to take control in an emergency.

Authored by Ward 6 Council member Charles Allen, the Autonomous Vehicle Deployment Authorization Act of 2026 would allow the commercial deployment of AVs offering rideshare services in the District of Columbia.

Proponents say autonomous vehicles are already safer than the average human driver. In addition, AVs can provide more equitable access to rideshare services throughout the city and accommodate people with disabilities.

The bill would establish a commercial autonomous vehicle program within D.C.’s Department of Transportation, which would issue permits for commercial AVs. Applicants would have to submit a first responder interaction plan to ensure that law enforcement and emergency personnel can safely interact with AVs, as well as contingency plans for operational challenges including power outages and network failures.

Under the bill, commercial vehicles would be phased in, and until Jan. 1, 2028, operators would be “limited to 200 vehicles.”

The bill would establish a vehicle miles traveled – or VMT – tax of 15 cents per mile that “encourages AV operators to minimize passenger-less operations and circuitous routing.”

Opponents say bill could eradicate drivers’ livelihoods 

Before the public hearing, opponents will hold a protest and news conference outside the Wilson Building.

Several unions, including those representing workers who rely on Uber and Lyft as their primary or supplemental source of income, will urge the council to put the brakes on the bill.

Pointing to San Francisco, “Waymo absorbed nearly 30 percent of the rideshare market in just 20 months. In most cities where autonomous vehicles have been introduced, driver pay has already dropped,” a news release said. “This is less money not only for drivers and their families, but less support for D.C. businesses and public services.”

One of the workers’ unions joining the protest, called 32BJ SEIU, said it represents over 20,000 Black and Brown building cleaners, security officers and airport workers in the D.C. area.

“Over 40% of the employees are part-time workers, many who rely on earning additional income through Uber or Lyft to make ends meet,” the release said.

Get breaking news and daily headlines delivered to your email inbox by signing up here.

© 2026 WTOP. All Rights Reserved. This website is not intended for users located within the European Economic Area.

National Museum of the American Latino to be housed in historic Smithsonian building

The Smithsonian Institution has decided to put the National Museum of the American Latino into an existing, historic building, rather than constructing a new one. The Smithsonian Board of Regents on Monday designated the Arts and Industries Building, a 145-year-old redbrick Victorian structure located between the Smithsonian Castle and the Hirshhorn Museum, as the permanent site of the National Museum of the American Latino, which Congress authorized in 2020. In 2022, the Smithsonian narrowed its survey for permanent locations for the National Museum of the American Latino and the American Women's History Museum to four locations near the National Mall on land owned by the National Park Service. The Arts and Industries Building, located at 900 Jefferson St. SW, was one of the four sites. New construction on National Park Service land would require congressional approval. However, since the Smithsonian already owns the Arts and Industries Building, the institution can place the National Museum of the American Latino in the existing building without additional legislation.
Read Next Story