Skip to main content

Why there's new buzz about the Commanders possibly moving to DC

There is new hope for Washington Commanders fans who want the team to move out of Maryland and build a new stadium in D.C., after a bill was introduced in Congress on Thursday related to the RFK Stadium site.

The legislation would extend the lease between D.C. and the federal government for the site for 99 years, allowing for mixed-use development there, including potentially a new stadium for the Commanders.

“There is a lot of work that needs to get done between now and seeing cranes in the sky,” said Mayor Muriel Bowser.

Bowser said she’s thrilled about the legislation.

“From the moment I became mayor, I made it a point for the District to get control of RFK and control our destiny,” Bowser said.

According to Bowser, the mixed-use development would include recreational activities, housing and restaurants.

“It’s a wonderful day for our city,” said Keith Anderson, D.C.’s interim deputy mayor for planning and economic development. “Sports are a priority for our city and to the success of our local economy.”

It comes a week after NFL owners unanimously approved the sale of the Washington Commanders from Dan Snyder to a group led by Josh Harris for a record $6.05 billion.

The purchase by Harris Blitzer Sports and Entertainment is the highest price paid for a North American professional sports club.

Harris, like Snyder, grew up in the D.C. region as an avid fan of the team.

The team’s biggest immediate challenge for the long-term future of the organization is a new stadium to replace FedEx Field, the rushed-to-completion home of the team since 1997 in Landover, Maryland, that has not aged well.

The site of RFK Stadium, the club’s previous home in the capital city, has significant backing as the place for the new venue.

“It’s going to take a while to unpack what really makes sense,” Harris said. “As far as RFK, I understand it’s the spiritual home of the history of the Commanders.”

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Judge lacked power to overturn ex-soldier Bowe Bergdahl’s military conviction, appeals court rules

WASHINGTON (AP) — A federal judge had no authority to overturn former U.S. Army soldier Bowe Bergdahl's military conviction for deserting his post in Afghanistan before Taliban-allied forces abducted him and held him captive for nearly five years, an appeals court has ruled. A three-judge panel from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit on Tuesday ordered the dismissal of Bergdahl's claims in district court. The panel said District Judge Reggie Walton in Washington lacked the jurisdiction to vacate Bergdahl’s court-martial conviction and sentence in 2023. Bergdahl had sued in 2021, arguing that the punishment violated his Fifth Amendment due-process rights. Walton ruled that military judge Jeffrey Nance created a potential conflict of interest by failing to disclose his application for a position as an immigration judge in the Justice Department. But the appeals court concluded that only military tribunals have the authority to vacate a court-martial judgment.
Read Next Story