Skip to main content

With more school systems opting for distance learning, experts weigh in

As more school systems shift to a virtual start to the school year, many parents are asking if online learning can be as good as in-person instruction. The answer is not so clear.

Christine Greenhow, associate professor of educational technology at Michigan State University, points to evidence that supports online learning.

“We have meta-analyses that suggest…that online learning, if well-designed, can be as effective in terms of student outcomes as in-person learning,” she said. “But the well-designed part is really key.”

That would involve frequent interactions between teachers and students, which was often not the case in the spring, she said.

Greenhow said distance learning can be most challenging for young children and those with limited tech resources, among others, but it can also help some students by allowing them to go at their own pace.

“Can online learning be better for some students? Absolutely. Can it be worse? Absolutely,” she said.

Natalie B. Milman, professor of educational technology at George Washington University, said not enough is known yet about the impact of distance learning on younger kids.

“There’s been very little research on young children learning online,” she said, while adding that the general consensus is that in-person learning is best for young children.

Milman said it’s not that distance learning is bad: “It’s just not the best for all learners at all ages,” she said.

Sabrina Wesley-Nero, associate professor of teaching at Georgetown University, believes high quality in-person learning is generally more effective, because in-person learning “helps us maintain a whole child focus in a way that’s just a little bit more challenging with distance learning,” she said.


More Coronavirus News

Looking for more information? D.C., Maryland and Virginia are each releasing more data every day. Visit their official sites here: Virginia | Maryland | D.C.

US strikes Iran and Tehran fires back as hostilities flare again

WASHINGTON (AP) — The U.S. military hit targets in Iran on Tuesday and Tehran fired missiles and drones in response as hostilities flare once again in an intermittent war that has lasted more than six months. The U.S. strikes followed others on Sunday that abruptly ended a month without military action and threatened to fully reignite a conflict that has spiked global oil prices and posed political problems for Republicans in November's midterm congressional elections. The renewed fighting comes after President Donald Trump had appeared to pivot toward trying to bend Iran to his will through economic sanctions. “If the failed Nation of Iran retaliates for this very justified attack, they will be hit again at a much harder and higher level, but it will not be the biggest attack of them all, that is waiting in the wings,” Trump warned on social media. U.S. Central Command said the latest strikes were in response to Tehran trying to attack commercial ships and American forces in the Middle East. Trump offered an additional explanation, telling Fox News in a phone call that U.S. forces struck Iran's radars.
Read Next Story