Skip to main content

7 Best Semiconductor ETFs to Buy for 2026

Few industries carry as many chokepoints as semiconductors. The value chain is complex, spanning intellectual property design, fabrication, manufacturing equipment, materials and memory. Each link plays a distinct role, and not all links are created equal.

Many of the high-flying stocks that now dominate benchmarks like the S&P 500 and Nasdaq-100 are designers. Companies such as Nvidia Corp. (ticker: NVDA) and Advanced Micro Devices Inc. (AMD) specialize in creating graphics processing units used in artificial intelligence applications.

“Semiconductors are the engine powering the AI revolution and the modern economy,” says Mo Sparks, chief product officer at Direxion. “Be it through trillion-dollar market caps, earnings surprises and misses, tariffs, or broader geopolitical events, today’s traders have plenty of catalysts to guide their conviction.”

[Sign up for stock news with our Invested newsletter.]

The economic moat for these companies lies in intellectual property, software ecosystems and the pace of innovation. Their fortunes rise and fall based on product cycles, data center demand and how quickly they can out-design competitors.

“The semiconductor industry is undergoing its biggest shift in decades,” says Tejas Dessai, director of thematic research at Global X ETFs. “AI is reshaping computing, creating demand for specialized hardware while displacing legacy components.”

Yet the true bottlenecks in semiconductors sit elsewhere. One notable example is ASML Holding NV (ASML). This Dutch company produces the extreme ultraviolet lithography machines used to etch advanced chips at the smallest nanometer nodes.

These machines are extraordinarily complex, cost hundreds of millions of dollars each and are effectively irreplaceable for cutting-edge chip production, giving ASML a near-monopoly in this niche. In particular, export controls on this equipment have become a central geopolitical lever because without ASML’s tools, the most advanced chips simply cannot be made.

The other bottleneck lies in semiconductor fabrication. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Ltd. (TSM), the dominant pure-play foundry, manufactures chips designed by companies around the world.

While firms such as Samsung Electronics Co Ltd. (005930.KS) and Intel Corp. (INTC) operate fabs, TSMC remains the unrivaled leader in producing the most advanced high-performance chips at scale. That dynamic adds geopolitical risk, particularly given tensions surrounding Taiwan’s sovereignty.

As an investor, you can therefore own designers betting on AI-driven demand, equipment makers controlling critical tools, foundries that manufacture the chips or even more specialized segments like memory. However, investors can also take a step back and gain more diversified exposure across the ecosystem through a semiconductor exchange-traded fund (ETF).

Here are seven of the best semiconductor ETFs to buy for 2026:

ETF Expense ratio
VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) 0.35%
VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF (SMHX) 0.35%
iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) 0.34%
SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF (XSD) 0.35%
Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum ETF (CHPX) 0.50%
Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) 0.19%
Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) 0.15%

VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH)

“Semiconductors continue to be a cornerstone for innovation, especially as AI models grow more powerful,” says Nick Frasse, product manager at VanEck. “We’re closely watching compute and scaling laws — the trend of continuously increasing processing power — which strongly supports sustained semiconductor demand.” VanEck offers SMH, which tracks the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index.

This ETF features a top-heavy portfolio, with Nvidia sitting at the top with an 18.2% weight followed by TSMC at 11.2%. However, this concentration has historically paid off for early investors, with SMH recording a 33.3% annualized total return over the trailing 10-year period. The ETF charges a 0.35% expense ratio, which works out to around $35 in fee drag every year assuming a $10,000 investment.

VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF (SMHX)

“The semiconductor industry continues to evolve rapidly, driven by fabless companies that prioritize chip design and innovation while outsourcing production,” Frasse notes. “This model allows firms like Nvidia to invest heavily in research and development, keep capital expenditures lower, and remain more agile as market conditions change.” Investors interested in targeting fabless firms may prefer SMHX over SMH.

SMHX’s portfolio does not include TSMC or ASML. In the event of escalating conflicts or increasing export controls, their absence may reduce risk for investors. “Geopolitical tensions and tariffs have made semiconductor supply chains more complicated, driving companies toward diversifying and localizing manufacturing,” Frasse explains. SMHX also charges a 0.35% expense ratio.

iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX)

“The potential benefits of investing in semiconductor ETFs include exposure to a high-growth industry with strong fundamentals, diversification across multiple companies in the industry and the potential for long-term capital appreciation,” says Sean August, CEO of the August Wealth Management Group. Investors preferring a less top-heavy yet still growth-tilted alternative to SMH pay prefer SOXX.

This ETF charges a lower expense ratio than SMH, and it tracks the NYSE Semiconductor Index instead. Micron Technology Inc. (MU) is currently the top holding at 8.5%, followed by Applied Materials Inc. (AMAT) and Nvidia at 6.9% each, and AMD at 6.4%. Historical total returns have also been competitive but lower than SMH, at 27.3% annualized over the trailing 10-year period.

SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF (XSD)

“When looking for semiconductor ETFs, investors should consider factors such as the expense ratio, the underlying index or benchmark, the fund’s holdings and diversification strategy, and the ETF’s historical performance,” August says. “It is also important to assess the fund’s liquidity to ensure that it is easy to buy and sell.” To reduce concentration risk further without sacrificing fees or liquidity, consider XSD.

This ETF tracks the S&P Semiconductor Select Industry Index, an equal-weighted benchmark of approximately 40 large-, mid- and small-cap semiconductor stocks. However, the equal-weighting strategy has historically capped momentum for high-performing semiconductor stocks, with XSD lagging over the last decade with a 24.3% annualized total return. The ETF also charges a 0.35% expense ratio.

[Read: 6 of the Best AI ETFs to Buy for 2026]

Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum ETF (CHPX)

“The semiconductor shift is most visible on three fronts: the transition from general-purpose processors to AI-optimized chips, the use of high-bandwidth memory to handle AI’s data intensity and the rise of ultra-fast interconnect solutions that bind AI servers together,” Dessai explains. Global X’s newest thematic ETF, CHPX, is designed to capture these trends for a 0.5% expense ratio.

“CHPX provides exposure to companies across the entire global compute stack, from AI semiconductors to data center equipment, power infrastructure and quantum technologies,” Dessai says. “This offers a more holistic view of the long-term computing ecosystem rather than a narrow slice of it.” The two largest holdings in CHPX are currently ASML and TSMC at 11.9% and 11.3%, respectively.

Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ)

“While certain segments of the semiconductor market, like memory, may be facing pressure due to supply concerns, the longer-term growth potential driven by advancements in AI, autonomous driving and high-performance computing remains strong,” says Rene Reyna, head of thematic and specialty product strategy at Invesco. SOXQ undercuts SMH, SOXX and XSD with a lower 0.19% expense ratio.

This ETF tracks the PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index, a benchmark of the 30 largest U.S.-listed semiconductor firms. Each September, PHLX’s benchmark will reconstitute to add or drop holdings, while rebalances occur quarterly in March, June, September and December. SOXQ is newer than SOXX and SMH, but it has delivered a strong 41% annualized total return over the last three years.

Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS)

Even cheaper than SOXQ, CHPS tracks the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index for a 0.15% expense ratio. While not a strict sustainability fund, it incorporates environmental, social and governance screens that exclude certain controversial business activities, and applies risk-based scoring that traditional semiconductor benchmarks do not. That results in a noticeably different portfolio.

Although CHPS still owns many of the familiar industry names, the weightings diverge meaningfully from more top-heavy funds like SMH or SOXX. The ETF is far more evenly distributed. CHPS’ current top holdings are Texas Instruments Inc. (TXN), Applied Materials and Micron, each sitting at around 4.9% of assets. This provides more balanced exposure across analog, equipment and memory segments.

More from U.S. News

Software Stocks Wilted After Claude Cowork’s Debut. But These 3 Stocks May Thrive

7 Best ETFs to Buy Now

6 Best Nasdaq-100 ETFs

7 Best Semiconductor ETFs to Buy for 2026 originally appeared on usnews.com

Update 02/17/26: This story was published at an earlier date and has been updated with new information.

Scott Pelley fired by CBS after ‘60 Minutes’ clash with management

(CNN) — CBS News fired veteran “60 Minutes” correspondent Scott Pelley on Tuesday, one day after he sharply criticized the newsmagazine’s new leadership in front of the staff.CBS News editor in chief Bari Weiss said Wednesday that her leadership team had tried to reconcile with Pelley, but “we weren’t able to do so.” The correspondent said that wasn’t true, reaffirming that he will not go quietly from the network where he worked for 37 years.Pelley’s firing is sure to trigger even more scrutiny of Weiss and her controversial efforts to overhaul the network news division.It will also force CBS into rebuilding mode since “60 Minutes” has now lost the majority of its full-time correspondents.Last week, Weiss oversaw the firings of correspondents Sharyn Alfonsi, Cecilia Vega, executive producer Tanya Simon and other senior staffers.CBS evidently wanted Pelley to stay with “60 Minutes,” but he was incensed by the firings and by the hiring of Nick Bilton, a former tech reporter with little TV experience, to run the show in Simon’s place. At a staff meeting on Monday, Pelley confronted Bilton and accused Weiss, who was not in attendance, of “murdering” “60 Minutes.”When Bilton said Weiss loves the show, Pelley responded, “She does not love this place. She was brought in to kill it, and she’s been doing exactly that.”Pelley also depicted Weiss and Bilton as unqualified for their jobs and said Bilton would “never be welcome here.” His scathing remarks immediately leaked to outside news outlets and ignited a crisis inside CBS.CBS management called Pelley in for a follow-up meeting on Tuesday afternoon. The two sides had very different depictions of the meeting afterward.A few hours later, in a Tuesday evening letter to Pelley, Bilton wrote that Pelley’s “antipathy to the future of the show has come through loud and clear. And I have heard you.”Therefore, he wrote, “your employment with CBS is terminated for cause effective immediately.”On Wednesday morning, Weiss told CBS staffers that “despite our attempts to engage with Scott Pelley and to find a way back, unfortunately, we weren’t able to do so, and so we had to part ways.”Pelley responded to Weiss through a statement to The New York Times. “Bari Weiss knows what she said is not true. In the meeting on Tuesday, in which I was effectively fired, there was no effort of any kind to ‘find a way back,’ as Weiss said in the editorial meeting,” he said. “At no point did anyone in the Tuesday meeting suggest that there could be steps taken by either side that would lead to a resolution.”Pelley’s depiction of events has political overtones. President Donald Trump sued CBS in 2024 over a “60 Minutes” interview with Kamala Harris, and even though legal experts said the suit was frivolous, Paramount’s previous ownership team decided to settle the case in July 2025 rather than defend the program in court.Furthermore, Paramount’s new ownership team has sought a close relationship with Trump and his administration, and some critics of CBS have asserted a link between corporate attempts to appease Trump and the current overhaul of “60 Minutes.” Paramount is currently seeking Trump administration approval to buy Warner Bros. Discovery, including CNN.Pelley invoked some of this in an initial statement late Tuesday, saying “the new owner of our network” is casting the legacy of “60 Minutes” aside, “apparently to curry a moment of favor with the Trump administration.”CBS leaders have portrayed the situation very differently, saying that Weiss and her deputies are trying to revive a moribund TV news division and reorient its programs to reach new digital audiences.Weiss has tapped outsiders to do so. Her hiring of Bilton, a filmmaker and former New York Times tech columnist, was the latest in a string of hotly debated moves.Some insiders at CBS said afterward that they thought Pelley was daring Weiss to fire him. His detractors at the network said he acted like a bully at the staff meeting. But his supporters — and he has many — said he was just standing up for his colleagues and trying to protect the “60 Minutes” franchise.In the letter justifying Pelley’s termination on Tuesday night, Bilton wrote to Pelley, “You hijacked my first meeting with staff to disparage me, my qualifications, and my intentions with remarkable incivility and contempt.”Bilton called it a “performative display of hostility enacted in front of the staff” that “demonstrated that you have no interest in contributing to the future success of the show, or approaching my new tenure with a mind open to collaboration and progress.”“Despite yesterday’s misconduct,” Bilton continued, “I had hoped that in sitting down with you today we could find a path forward together. You made clear that you are not interested in such a path.”Later Tuesday evening, Bilton wrote to “60 Minutes” staffers about Pelley’s termination, acknowledging the correspondent’s stature inside the newsmagazine while defending the decision to “part ways” with him.“I know how much Scott meant to many of you, and I don’t say this lightly,” Bilton wrote. “I made repeated attempts to have direct conversations with him over the weekend, and this afternoon I tried to find common ground. That was not the path Scott chose.”Bilton also sought to turn the staff’s attention back to the future of “60 Minutes,” writing, “I realize this is a great deal of change in a very short time, and I wouldn’t pretend otherwise.”“I won’t relitigate the last week with you here,” Bilton wrote. “What I will commit to is this: My unyielding support for each of you, the journalism that you do and what we will do together going forward.”In Pelley’s statement following the termination letter, the correspondent said “60 Minutes” “lost its DNA” due to last week’s firings.“Good people were silenced because they stood up for our audience,” Pelley wrote. “They stood for fairness against the forces of political bias; they stood for professionalism against chaos.Pelley also denounced “incompetence and unprofessionalism” from the new leaders of CBS.“At 60 Minutes, we have fought harder than anyone knows to save the program that became an American icon,” Pelley wrote. “We owed that to our millions of viewers. I am deeply moved by the thousands of wishes we have received to ‘keep up the good fight.’ Most of the men and women of CBS News are still in that fight. But now the collapse of values at the top has become untenable. The leadership of 60 Minutes is no longer recognizable. The principles I hold dear are gone, and so I must leave as well.”This story has been updated with additional reporting.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story